I'm a little bit confused about number eighteen (18) on the forum rules, I have seen some users in the forum get in trouble and some get negative trust for having multiple accounts in the forum, but here it clearly says that it's allowed. I really don't understand it or am I missing out on something? I really need some explanation!

BSV fall in price but it was when bitcoin and other coins were falling recently. As bitcoin and altcoins has been rising, it is following them. I will say BSV is in good state as for now.

But Craig Wright has been finished already. His bad actions of lies led him to this. People can know the beginning of a war but they can know the ending of the war until after the end. This is what happened to Craig Wright.

Nobody will pity the man at all.

Lets roll with BLOCK 851089

 Free shipping in the USA to you or MJ. Overseas you will need to cover or I can ship to MJ for free then you pay from there on....Cheers!

 Goodluck to ye all

Help can be rendered to someone who wants it and agrees to accept it. If you offer help to someone whom you think needs it but the person doesn't accept that they need help, then all your effort will be futile. According to that article, it is easy to identify someone with ADHD because of the symptoms. 

If I see someone with such a disorder, I will talk to them and explain what ADHD disorder is and how I feel it's affecting them. I will also explain to them the symptoms they are exhibiting that clearly show they are having this disorder, and then I will clearly advise them to stop gambling because of their condition. It is left for the person to take my advice or not; I can't force the person to stop gambling.

An exchange is decentralized if it doesn't have one central (main) point of failure. If every user of the exchange acts as a node in an interconnected P2P way and you make connections directly with different peers, that's decentralized. If one of those peers goes offline, it doesn't disrupt the entire operation of the exchange. It only affects that user, their active trades, and others interested in trading with the peer that went offline. Everything else runs normally.

There is no rule that says how many servers are needed. Like I said before, the more there are, the more decentralized a system is. 1 server equals to centralization. 2 is better, but still not good enough. 10 means more decentralization than with one or two, and so on. Obviously, you can't have 1000s of running instances (servers) of a DEX if that platform only has 200 users. 

Can't help you there. I don't know. I am questioning its decentralized nature because I think you must connect to one central point to be able to use Robosats, but I could be wrong. Let's see if someone else drops by who knows how Robosats actually runs. 

TOR, the network is decentralized. But we are not talking about the TOR network, but the services that run on top of it. TOR is decentralized because your connection goes through different hops or nodes before you connect to the target server. These nodes can't connect who you are as a person to what you are doing. That's how you get anonymity with TOR. Because the connection hops between different servers, it's impossible to know who connected to what and what they are doing, unless all the TOR nodes that relay your connection are compromised.

But don't confuse the way TOR (the network) works with an exchange available over TOR. That exchange can still be centralized if the only way to use it is to connect to the main server of that exchange. eXch, which we discussed in a different topic, is a good example. It runs over TOR but is centralized. The coins you trade there belong to eXch, not individual users. eXch isn't a P2P exchange where individuals connect with one another. No, you are dealing with the liquidity that eXch provides.

It's worth pointing out that just because something is centralized, it doesn't equal to not trusted and unsafe.

Free game can not be gambling in my own understanding.  gambling is Anything or whatever we risk our money with, by trying luck base on probability which you may or may not win as the case may be. It is more of a practice section that enable you to know more about the game which after that, you may be good in the gambling section as a good predictor. Although there are also some games that cant be seen in the gambling section but only in the gaming section. but if you are a regular game player of the kind that is find in gambling section then you are good to go. So in my conclusion free game is not gambling.

Looking for middleman escrow service on BitcoinTalk forum. Please recommend.

Good but it did take too long. The damage is already done. He scammed thousands of people. Many people will lose their life savings because of him. Craig had enormous wealth and he delayed what's coming for him for a very long time. Some people though, probably deserved it for supporting BSV but I don't think all BSV supporters were lunatics like Craig. Some of them were probably just innocent fools. BSV has $721 million market cap at the moment. (bsv price: $36) Soon it will be much lower. It is as good as dead. BCH played this smarter than BSV. At least it is above LTC in terms of market cap at the moment.

Cryptocurrency market develops very quickly and gives a lot of opportunities. Such opportunities attract a lot of people.

Don't they merely use those services to filter "tainted" outputs instead of something more "nefarious"? Or are they actually hiding something from their users/general public? Because if it's data from outputs before the outputs went though the coordinator that's being shared, then what can ANY coordinator actually do. That data is transparent on the blockchain.

Are you saying that it's data AFTER CoinJoin that's being shared with agencies?