Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 05:36:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
 21 
 on: Today at 05:33:44 PM 
Started by minerjones - Last post by Steeley
.008

 22 
 on: Today at 05:33:37 PM 
Started by tokeweed - Last post by Swordsoffreedom


Here we go. Another unexpected thing is coming again. According to the latest rumor, Ratcliff has contacted De Zerbi to be a successor for ten hag if club will sack him. If this report is correct, ten hags will be fired by manchester united. Manchester United fans must be welcoming him as a new coach when it becomes a reality. I know t's hard to accept it.
It's unbelievable that after Chelsea that tries to contact Maresca to be Pochettino's successor. I can't believe it now. im only wondering what all of United fans think about this.

I know that if majority of people may be disagree with it but let's see what's gonna do by manchester united in the approaching days.
I'm expecting some surprising news as soon as possible.


Quote
Former Brighton & Hove Albion manager Roberto De Zerbi has reportedly emerged as a surprise candidate to replace Erik ten Hag at Manchester United.

Source: https://www.footballtransfers.com/en/transfer-news/uk-premier-league/2024/05/man-utd-transfer-news-roberto-de-zerbi-erik-ten-hag-chelsea-brighton

I hope that they are going to change the coach at least. he is going to be definitely an improvement for them compared to Ten Hag. Even though I have not seen much from the coach that we are talking about here. but I still think that he is at least not going to bring such bad results as Ten Hag has actually brought for this club. 

but at the same time, I will also say that Manchester United can definitely get a coach who is even better than him. Probably the only problem is that the recent record of Manchester United is not very good and probably that's why good coaches are not very interested in working with Manchester United at this moment.  I just hope that they do not keep the current coach that they have just because they were able to win the FA Cup final.

 23 
 on: Today at 05:33:33 PM 
Started by willi9974 - Last post by SirCharly
Ja bin endlich im Pool, ein Neustart bewirkt Wunder.
Habe jetzt mein Bitaxe und mein Nerdminer über die selbe Adresse laufen.
Wenn ich mir noch ein Bitaxe hole, kann ich den dann auch über sircharly_1 laufen lassen?
Habe ich dann statt 500 GHs dann 1000GHs?

 24 
 on: Today at 05:33:24 PM 
Started by zuzie - Last post by temple

A goalkeeper who will be 31 years old in a few months and is still under contract for around two years at a big club like Manchester City, it would be impossible to accept an offer from one of the clubs in the Saudi pro league, he is still City's main goalkeeper and is not playing because of an injury, not because performance, City of course will not just let go of their main goalkeeper, there are many big clubs whose main goalkeeper stays for seasons, especially if there is no visible decline in performance then he will stay at the club.
I also read the news that Ittihad FC is eyeing this goalkeeper from Brazil along with Mohammad Salah, Salah might be possible for this club to get but Edersen doesn't seem like something that can happen this season.
Even though the Brazilian goalkeeper is over 30, Manchester City still fully trusts this player. Ederson is the regular face of not only Manchester City but also the Brazilian national team. The goalkeeper is a regular for Manchester City and if he doesn't have injury problems we can see the manager relying on him directly. The Brazilian superstar still has two seasons left on his contract with Manchester City, so there is no doubt that the player will stay at Manchester City for at least two more seasons. If he can play for the team with his best these two seasons, then Manchester City can extend the contract with him. So there is no chance of the goalkeeper leaving Manchester City in this transfer window.

But didn't Ederson have quite some competition from Stefan Ortega or was that only due to injury time?

Because I saw that Ortega made almost 20 full games, but I can't recall that Ederson was injured so much. He made about double the number of games, so pretty close to 1/3 vs. 2/3 of playing time. I wouldn't be shocked if Guardiola gives Ortega quite some games and that would probably not what Ederson is looking for.

I stopped calling any Saudi Arabia deals impossible because these guys are willing to pay sums of money that can't even be grasped. Imagine they offer Ortega 30 million, he says no, and they say ok we double the money. For how long could a guy like Ederson resist?

See what Mbappe has done and why he stayed at PSG. The reason was that he got this insane salary of 70 million per year or so and that he got lump sums or signing bonuses on top of that. Money can change everything.

But I would be a bit confused why a club from Saudi Arabia would pay so much for a goalkeeper. Not that it is not an important position, but still it would be a bit surprising.

 25 
 on: Today at 05:32:08 PM 
Started by Marvelockg - Last post by topbitcoin
Speaking of circumstances, I don't have any luxury items, lots of land or buildings that can be used as collateral to take out a loan from the bank. and if I have to take out a loan from a savings and loan cooperative, apart from being small the interest given is also quite high, and if I start a business using a loan from a cooperative it seems like it will only be burdensome and difficult. .

So another alternative so that I can still realize what I plan, working with investors seems better than deciding to take out a loan. Although it is true that finding investors who want to work with us is not easy and requires quite a long process. However, by getting funds from investors, we don't need to worry about paying back high-interest loans. Investors are usually rewarded with a share of the business's profits, rather than a fixed monthly payment. Getting investors means we have partners in business. which of course can open up many new opportunities and support the growth of our business more than just the funds provided.

 26 
 on: Today at 05:30:37 PM 
Started by AB de Royse777 - Last post by Compromise me

Again at the end of this conversation, we have few suggestions which are not under ICC talk agenda for the securing of test format first thing they need to work on for having test matches for four days with secondly they also need to work on for having 2 tiers in test format first top 8 and then secondly 8 remaining, and they must bring 2 teams from tier 2 into tier 1 every cycle which will be work for 2 years and WTC will be also had some good improvement in quality due to have tip 8 teams and every team must play against others which will be also helpful for the all even if they are having problems to face each other at home then we need to work on neutral venues which are also good for the spirit of the game.

Maybe few will not happy with this all, but now we have no other things to improvement of quality and also having better things for this test format which is losing its beauty due to lack of interest from the top test nations.
you are explaining good. Test format cricket is a real cricket and we should work for test cricket. ICC should should provide opportunities to the lower teams ,in this way ,they will get a chance to play cricket against big teams. We have seen the same teams a lot of times but ICC should change criteria. Zimbabwe, Ireland, Netherland, Nepal should play test matches against big teams. Most probably,Change in test cricket will happen . May be we will get a new champion because of changing the strategy of ICC but that is not easy step for ICC . ICC should focus on that point and they should analyse the all teams stat whole the world. In this way , quality of cricket will increase.

 27 
 on: Today at 05:30:35 PM 
Started by Ricardo11 - Last post by tabas
Most of the analyses that I have seen looking at the same patterns of the charts from different cycles of halving followed by a bull run are likely the same. I agree that this is the last chance to buy before we see it hit $80k onwards. If the time comes and BTC reaches that point, many are going to FOMO at that price but we have never lack in reminding them to keep on buying while we're not yet there. If they will miss this opportunity, they have to pass and watch us and the market on how we take profits and then wait for their turn on the next cycle again.

 28 
 on: Today at 05:30:28 PM 
Started by Why2why - Last post by Accardo
That's true going all in into gambling with one salary ain't advisable at all , to me that's is a sign of one not having self-control and also sign of being addicted to gambling. Because gambling is all about winning or Losing, and most time the chances of losing is way higher than winning, so there's high chances of losing all that salary once. So is way better to use some certain percentage of your salary than using all . And always use the kinda percentage you can afford to lose .

The source of income for each gambler is different. Some may be getting salaries on the job while others may be doing business. Also, some may get more salary and make more money while others may earn less. Also, some people have more expenses as compared to others. Therefore we cannot say how much salary or how much % of salary or income one can devote to the gambling. The figure may vary from person to person and more importantly, it depends on the financial condition of the gamblers.
Not everyone's income is the same. Some earn a lot of money in a month and some earn a small amount in a month. Some can afford to lose more money gambling and some can afford less. Now you should consider yourself how much money you can afford to spend on gambling. Gambling is usually played for fun, so you can gamble for fun. Never get addicted to gambling and spend a lot of money gambling. Gambling depends on luck, if luck is good you will win if luck is bad then you will lose.
Gambling with our salary requires caution and management because a gambler who jokes with his salary is mainly joking with his business or work. The funds we earn is meant to be used in running the business and when they is no money to move a business the person will definitely fail in his field. Hence, it's crucial for a gambler to be careful with the percentage of money he takes out from his salary to gamble. A thread in previous months was centered on wagering at least 10% of our salary every month. That way the player will be able to enjoy the game and not lose out a lot.

Gambling can be tricky and a player would think he already posses enough luck to win in gambling, thereby wagering too much money till his income gets exhausted. Here the problem will kick in because no money will be left to pursue the business. Taking loans would be the next choice for the gambler and he would be surprised at how his business may start to crumble as the borrowed may still be invested back to gambling. How then will a player make money for gambling if not through his income? Managing it is the main point. It's fine to wager from our salary. Money is made to be spent on this we enjoy.

 29 
 on: Today at 05:29:59 PM 
Started by VNDR - Last post by VNDR
Still works 2024. Get $10 off when you checkout using crypto!

 30 
 on: Today at 05:29:53 PM 
Started by freedomgo - Last post by STT
Quote
I tried an experiment by just recording my picks and then betting the opposite of my analysis. Surprisingly, this resulted in profitable betting.

Yes it takes alot of humble thinking to realize maybe you should take the other side of your bet.    Sometimes this might mean you hedge a bet, especially if the odds advance further and favor doing so.

I'd rank this level of versatility as top level betting, where the gamble is more important then your own ego.  You have to be pretty nimble in your emotional flexibility to do this and explore the profitability of each side to the bet; we all have bias for sure.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!