Satoshi Nakamoto otkriven!

[seljo]

Pored toga I Andreas M. Antonopoulos je bio kontaktiran da "potvrdi" Satoshi Nakamotov identitet. Njegova reakcija sve kaze:

About two weeks ago I was contacted and asked to offer security advice for a project. I was asked to sign an NDA in order to discuss the project itself, something I am reluctant to do, in general. Once I received the NDA however, it became obvious that the project was related to verifying the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. I immediately declined the offer, declined to participate and declined to sign the NDA.
I'm sure many people will think I was wrong to decline the "opportunity" to verify SN's identity. From my perspective, the request for me to verify his/her/their identity is in itself an appeal to authority. It is replacing public cryptographic proof with endorsement by a third party. If SN wants to "prove" their identity, they don't need an "authority" to do so. They can do it in a public, open manner. To ask people in the space who have a reputation to stake that reputation and vouch for SN's identity raises many red flags in my mind.
I don't know if Craig Wright is SN. I don't care and I don't want to know.
As I have expressed many times in the past, I think the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto does not matter. More importantly I think it serves to distract from the fact that bitcoin is not controlled by anyone and is not a system of Appeal-to-Authority. Identifying the creator only serves to feed the appeal-to-authority crowd, as if SN is some kind of infallible prophet, or has any say over bitcoin's future.
Identity and authority are distractions from a system of mathematical proof that does not require trust. This is not a telenovela. Bitcoin is a neutral framework of trust that can bring financial empowerment to billions of people. It works because it doesn't depend on any authority. Not even Satoshi's.
Back to work.

Eeeee lipo je on to reka.

[sbogovac]

Cinjenica da su prevarili BBC nije nesto, barem meni, spektakularno. Novinari se VRLO vrijetko razumiju u temu o kojoj pisu i "zavise" o izvorima informacija.
Ono sto mi je nevejerojatno je da je tip mislio da ce prevariti crypto zajednicu na tako jeftinu foru.

Ne mislim da mu nije uopste bio cilj da "prevari[...] crypto zajednicu", nego da (opet!) ubedi par bogatase koje nemaju pojma (barem o crypto svetu) a imaju previse para (pa se ne plase "uloziti")...  

[PinkLlama]

Kao što je netko spomenuo već na postu, novinari VRLO često nemaju pojma o čemu pričaju te ovise o izvoru. Tako da ja vjerujem da on NIJE SM nego da lik sere govna. Kada on pokaze dokaze (prave) onda ima moje poštovanje i vjeru.

[Manfred Macx]

Trenutačno na r/bitcoin redditu raspravljaju o mogućnosti da je pokojni David Kleiman Satoshi. Navodno je bio dosta pametan lik, ali s druge njegovi radovi ne pokazuju da je imao dovoljno znanja da bi napravio Bitcoin, a čini se da nije niti programirao.

[Lucky - Luciano]

Jest u kurcu. Satoši Nakamoto je Satoši Nakamoto  . Pa imaju već otprilike dvije godine kada ga je našao neki novinar u USA. Dugo vremena je tragao za njim,proučavao njegovu kompletnu karijeru i život i našao ga konačno. Isti taj Satoši radio je u CIA ili FBI (ne sjećam se tačno) i radio je kao informatički stručnjak koji je bio baš stručan za to da napravi kripto valutu. A i pričaju da je USA napravila bitkoin,odnosno ta neka njihova bezbjednosna agencija. Novinar je htio da od njega dobije intervju,ali mu je ovaj rekao da on nije napravio bitkoin i da želi da uživa u miru te da  će ga tužiti ako ga ne ostavi na miru. Opet,ko će sigurno znati je li on zaista tvorac BTC. Ljudi u zadnje vrijeme pišu svašta o bitkoinu. Čitao sam o raznim navodnim tvorcima a neki ugledni član ovog sajta se je kleo da BTC nije mogao napraviti 1 čovjek već da on zna da su ga napravila neka trojica ,ali da njihova imena neće saopštiti.

[sbogovac]

Jest u kurcu. [...]

Jeste li procitali ceo topic, ili samo reagirate na naslov?

EDIT: topic zakljucan, nema tu jos puno sta da se doda...