Rollbit, This is my Final Message.

[tetaeridanus]

Is this what you get after you apologize to a man?

Is this how you should be talking to a person who feels victimized?

I don’t think so.

If you really wanted the best of both worlds, you could pm when instead of threating me that if you go public; I wouldn’t want that.

Seems like you don’t put yourself in my shoes. If you did, you would know how wrong this sentence is, and offending.

You already knew I was gonna reaction to this, so why are you giving hints for me to temper up?

What is your motive?

I am asking seriously.

To make me look like a clown? Or turning me in to a circus show?

I am in desperate times, and I cannot fathom how your words have angered me.

[examplens]

I am asking seriously.

To make me look like a clown? Or turning me in to a circus show?

Man, first you need to catch your breath and calm down a bit. You are making a circus out of this here, and you have turned "your final message" into a thread of 40+ final messages.
You are asking here for the others to explain why they support or use your flag, and if you don't like some of the explanations, you start with insults and provocations. Your approach turns even those who had the intention of helping you to become disinterested in your case.

p.s. Is this your first and only account on this forum (not counting 14z4rus, which is obvious), I have seen your writing style before, but not by good reputation.

[tetaeridanus]

I am asking seriously.

To make me look like a clown? Or turning me in to a circus show?

Man, first you need to catch your breath and calm down a bit. You are making a circus out of this here, and you have turned "your final message" into a thread of 40+ final messages.
You are asking here for the others to explain why they support or use your flag, and if you don't like some of the explanations, you start with insults and provocations. Your approach turns even those who had the intention of helping you to become disinterested in your case.

p.s. Is this your first and only account on this forum (not counting 14z4rus, which is obvious), I have seen your writing style before, but not by good reputation.

I have not seen any intention of people who are trying to help here when some people tried to de-rail my topic. I am always at fault right? How can I respect someone who opposes just because he can? Doing so with evidence is different, without evidence and doing it just because he can.

I am sorry if my behavior disintrested you in following my topic.

However, unlike holydarkness; like he said, I am the one who is get thrown punches here.

And for your question, 14z4rus is a real life aquitance of mine; not me. Who came for support. Just like many of you have here..

I don’t understand; who are you talking about? This is my first and only account.

I am ready to escrow any amount to anyone who can prove me otherwise.

If you are accusing such allegations (not you), prove it. I am telling this to blantant liars.

[tetaeridanus]

Hello @kingbj21 ,

I value your opinion on the matter, however please let’s try to not derail the topic here.

Personal direct messaging just derails this topic, and the threatening grammar from holydarkness tempered me; however no need for insults please.

I, as a grieving victim talker warmly; and got sarcasm as response.

No need to say anything about this matter; but no insults please.

Warm regards.

[ineedhelpplease]

I don't mean to go off topic but I don't understand any of the hate against Holydarkness and some of it is like laughable.

The whole idea of him being some sort of "casino puppet master" seems like some sort of conspiracy meme.

Going off my past experience the dude helped explain my situation and I was able to understand it fully from Rollbit's perspective because of him. Everything was absolutely straightforward with our previous interactions and he also PMed Razer to help with the situation, which is all great and he was also trying to help recover the money I lost from FTX after the Rollbit situation was over. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471380.0) If you read the thread it doesn't feel like anything bad that was claimed here, other than the whole "You didn't read TOS" which I do not even see bad. This is true and TOS should always be looked at, especially when you're trusting other people/businesses. Unfortunately in my case, I lost whats around $20K today because of my own fault. It was horrible back then but at some point (In this case it was very quickly for me) I did realize it was my fault, and Rollbit had to act what seemed very irresponsible to most people who are unfamiliar with how these gambling sites worked purely for legal reasons. Holydarkness has far more experience with them than we do and we shouldn't hate on the man for speaking the truth about our situations.

Nothing was "dodged"

I wasn't being "mocked"

And like in most situations it would be the players' faults.

There's a whole lot more I can say but truly it doesn't make sense. I fail to understand how he mocks people or whatever accusations are like that and I highly doubt he's being paid by the casinos for these posts defending them. He is only being honest, and eventually you're gonna have to be a man and accept defeat. Eventually, you're literally going to have to accept that you've lost the case, even if it is painful to you. At least we get to learn from it. And I'm 100% sure that if he sees a gambling company in the wrong then he will call them out in a respectful manner, which I can bet has happened before. I can only see him being "paid by casinos" if he's in a signature campaign, which anyone with a high rank can apply to those.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

I don't mean to go off topic but I don't understand any of the hate against Holydarkness and some of it is like laughable.

The whole idea of him being some sort of "casino puppet master" seems like some sort of conspiracy meme.

Going off my past experience the dude helped explain my situation and I was able to understand it fully from Rollbit's perspective because of him. Everything was absolutely straightforward with our previous interactions and he also PMed Razer to help with the situation, which is all great and he was also trying to help recover the money I lost from FTX after the Rollbit situation was over. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471380.0) If you read the thread it doesn't feel like anything bad that was claimed here, other than the whole "You didn't read TOS" which I do not even see bad. This is true and TOS should always be looked at, especially when you're trusting other people/businesses. Unfortunately in my case, I lost whats around $20K today because of my own fault. It was horrible back then but at some point (In this case it was very quickly for me) I did realize it was my fault, and Rollbit had to act what seemed very irresponsible to most people who are unfamiliar with how these gambling sites worked purely for legal reasons. Holydarkness has far more experience with them than we do and we shouldn't hate on the man for speaking the truth about our situations.

Nothing was "dodged"

I wasn't being "mocked"

And like in most situations it would be the players' faults.

There's a whole lot more I can say but truly it doesn't make sense. I fail to understand how he mocks people or whatever accusations are like that and I highly doubt he's being paid by the casinos for these posts defending them. He is only being honest, and eventually you're gonna have to be a man and accept defeat. Eventually, you're literally going to have to accept that you've lost the case, even if it is painful to you. At least we get to learn from it. And I'm 100% sure that if he sees a gambling company in the wrong then he will call them out in a respectful manner, which I can bet has happened before. I can only see him being "paid by casinos" if he's in a signature campaign, which anyone with a high rank can apply to those.

Because both these people are clowns. One guy is a gambling addict that has nothing else to do than blackmailing one casino after the other in this forum and the other (even though he had a solid case against rollbit) has driven into hate speech because he didn't get the help he thought he was entitled to. Then he insulted Holy personally which then withdrew from his case, easy as that and totally understandable
Simple case of self implosion. If he kept his composure, Holy would have done more, be he didn't. Now he is only hating and spamming, making several threads that nobody here cares about anymore because he showed his true face.

If you have a problem with a casino this forum is NOT the place to go to. There are sites on focussing on mediation between players and sites, this is just a bitcoin forum that also has a scam section. Some people don't understand that unfortunately.

[tetaeridanus]

I don't mean to go off topic but I don't understand any of the hate against Holydarkness and some of it is like laughable.

The whole idea of him being some sort of "casino puppet master" seems like some sort of conspiracy meme.

Going off my past experience the dude helped explain my situation and I was able to understand it fully from Rollbit's perspective because of him. Everything was absolutely straightforward with our previous interactions and he also PMed Razer to help with the situation, which is all great and he was also trying to help recover the money I lost from FTX after the Rollbit situation was over. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471380.0) If you read the thread it doesn't feel like anything bad that was claimed here, other than the whole "You didn't read TOS" which I do not even see bad. This is true and TOS should always be looked at, especially when you're trusting other people/businesses. Unfortunately in my case, I lost whats around $20K today because of my own fault. It was horrible back then but at some point (In this case it was very quickly for me) I did realize it was my fault, and Rollbit had to act what seemed very irresponsible to most people who are unfamiliar with how these gambling sites worked purely for legal reasons. Holydarkness has far more experience with them than we do and we shouldn't hate on the man for speaking the truth about our situations.

Nothing was "dodged"

I wasn't being "mocked"

And like in most situations it would be the players' faults.

There's a whole lot more I can say but truly it doesn't make sense. I fail to understand how he mocks people or whatever accusations are like that and I highly doubt he's being paid by the casinos for these posts defending them. He is only being honest, and eventually you're gonna have to be a man and accept defeat. Eventually, you're literally going to have to accept that you've lost the case, even if it is painful to you. At least we get to learn from it. And I'm 100% sure that if he sees a gambling company in the wrong then he will call them out in a respectful manner, which I can bet has happened before. I can only see him being "paid by casinos" if he's in a signature campaign, which anyone with a high rank can apply to those.

Because both these people are clowns. One guy is a gambling addict that has nothing else to do than blackmailing one casino after the other in this forum and the other (even though he had a solid case against rollbit) has driven into hate speech because he didn't get the help he thought he was entitled to. Then he insulted Holy personally which then withdrew from his case, easy as that and totally understandable
Simple case of self implosion. If he kept his composure, Holy would have done more, be he didn't. Now he is only hating and spamming, making several threads that nobody here cares about anymore because he showed his true face.

If you have a problem with a casino this forum is NOT the place to go to. There are sites on focussing on mediation between players and sites, this is just a bitcoin forum that also has a scam section. Some people don't understand that unfortunately.

Hello AHOYBRAUSE,

I respect your opinion on me,

How about you also give your opinion about the clowns who try derailing my topic?

For sure, I will answer them; I am no idiot to get framed and stay silent.

Holydarkness openly threats me, you stay silent; but a ‘disgusting’ word is offensive?

I have apologized to him, but you seem to not forget about that situation.

What an objective man you are.

We have many clowns under the thread, but not one of them is me.


Edit = nothing changes the fact I had a solid case against rollbit and it was dodged thanks to the well explained (s) opposition of two Default Imbeciles.

[holydarkness]

ineedhelpplease, thank you for the kind words.

AHOYBRAUSE, if I may argue about this forum is not the place to go when someone encountered a problem with a casino, to an extent, yes, it is correct, when cases got complicated and sensitive information is needed to be provided to validate the findings and rulings, yes, the forum is severely limited at it and is far inferior to ADR bodies.

But, if I may give my opinion for small cases, like a pending withdrawal, or a [legit case] of inability to perform KYC due to some...thing on the casino's KYC page, I think this forum serves its purpose better, in sense of faster resolution and response. Granted, CG and AG can "enforce" the rep to reply within certain time frame [one week, extended to another one week, and probably another extension of one week if the mediator deemed fit], while a reply here is a bit hit or miss.

Over time though, I managed to establish connections with staffs of casinos in a direct contact, which make reaching them for a resolution [again, IMHO] far faster than if we get it to CG.

Thus, my default suggestion and approach to cases is to try to deescalate it first by having them tried here, see if we can get the rep to give their side and/or get the situation resolved. And when that failed, we move it to the higher authority.

[...]
Holydarkness openly threats me, you stay silent; but a ‘disgusting’ word is offensive?

I have apologized to him, but you seem to not forget about that situation.

What an objective man you are.

We have many clowns under the thread, but not one of them is me.


Edit = nothing changes the fact I had a solid case against rollbit and it was dodged thanks to the well explained (s) opposition of two Default Imbeciles.

[Another long inhale and even longer exhale]

I can't believe I have to spell it out to you. But, let's do it.

This is the exact part of the post being referenced,

[...]

What do you think about this? It is important for me.

Thanks in advance.

Tetaeridanus.

At this point? Trust me, you don't want me to write in public on what I think about this. Paragraph 20 of the same post I linked above would have a relation to this.

Some might argue that this is me abusing my DT power by "being silent" and not pointing the obvious [though the cat is actually already out of the bag] or perhaps a chance to question my judgment capability. But I'll argue that this is me waiting and see, with a splash of that "OP's shoes and Rollbit's glasses".
[...]

Perhaps at this mental state [no offense] you perceive everything as an attack, or perhaps that's just your default setting. But try to see it with a different glasses, for a second?

You asked for my opinion about your flag and the entire sub-topic surrounding it. In other words, the case itself. I, with reference to the older post where I say I --summarized-- know this board and its past cases like the back of my hand told you as above, that you don't want me to write in public.

That is not --at least not intended to be as-- a threat, that's a friendly gesture of declining to pitch in, in order to not necessarily stir the pot, as reflected in the part where I wrote, "this is me waiting and see, with a splash of that "OP's shoes and Rollbit's glasses".

Imagine it like this, we're two buddies where I know a thing or two about you. We're in a party, or in a street, or in whatever setting you preferred to be, where a group of people's attention are shifted towards you, and you asked me to tell them, publicly, what I think of your juggling ability. Knowing one or two things about that juggling ability and what my opinion will bring to the public, I said, "oh, trust me, you don't want me to give my opinion about that".

That is a threat... how?

Though, to further clarify the snippet, "the cat is actually already out of the bag", as one or two attentive people actually already mentioned their opinion about the topic.

Is that understandable? And is that still perceived as a threat? And, most importantly, do you still want me to tell the public what I think? Because, you see, I initially shied away from it because I don't want to stir the pot, for your sake. But it seems it make things worse as it spin differently in your head. So, if you still really want to know my opinion, just holler, and I'll give my best to explain what I think about this case in details, to help us all get over it.

[tetaeridanus]

Perhaps at this mental state [no offense] you perceive everything as an attack, or perhaps that's just your default setting. But try to see it with a different glasses, for a second?

You asked for my opinion about your flag and the entire sub-topic surrounding it. In other words, the case itself. I, with reference to the older post where I say I --summarized-- know this board and its past cases like the back of my hand told you as above, that you don't want me to write in public.

That is not --at least not intended to be as-- a threat, that's a friendly gesture of declining to pitch in, in order to not necessarily stir the pot, as reflected in the part where I wrote, "this is me waiting and see, with a splash of that "OP's shoes and Rollbit's glasses".

Imagine it like this, we're two buddies where I know a thing or two about you. We're in a party, or in a street, or in whatever setting you preferred to be, where a group of people's attention are shifted towards you, and you asked me to tell them, publicly, what I think of your juggling ability. Knowing one or two things about that juggling ability and what my opinion will bring to the public, I said, "oh, trust me, you don't want me to give my opinion about that".

That is a threat... how?

Though, to further clarify the snippet, "the cat is actually already out of the bag", as one or two attentive people actually already mentioned their opinion about the topic.

Is that understandable? And is that still perceived as a threat? And, most importantly, do you still want me to tell the public what I think? Because, you see, I initially shied away from it because I don't want to stir the pot, for your sake. But it seems it make things worse as it spin differently in your head. So, if you still really want to know my opinion, just holler, and I'll give my best to explain what I think about this case in details, to help us all get over it.

Hey holydarkness,

I have nothing against you, and also support your mediating actions for this forum as you have said to AHOYBRAUSE.

Let me tell you about politeness; AHOYBRAUSE continues on calling me a "clown" in my thread, what about that?

Anyways,

"Perhaps at this mental state [no offense] you perceive everything as an attack, or perhaps that's just your default setting."

This is definetely not my default setting, and I am going through a rough emotional time this last months. Thanks for understanding.

From your perspective, if I imagine we are buddies; yes, we are not; hope to be in future. However you do everything a buddy don't do.

You continue on with the "I will tell public if you want" sayings;

Which makes me under spotlight; to accept or not accept both are not ways to go.

If you want to watch and see, please do so. But please, don't continue on with these types of messages. I get them wrong, also many will; and I don't want to continue discussing off-topic for both you and my sake.

I hope you understand my peace offer.


Also for the two people you are mentioning on DT; owlcatz is a circus player with that kind of proof for opposing and you know it, and DT should look for this matter.

I won't talk about DaveF because he seems to understand the whole situation wrongly, didn't even read (owlcatz also) that I already got compansated 800 USD for the site's mistake, and why I got it; but continued on blabbering nonesense. I don't think this two oppositions are valid; a 0 IQ monkey would also see this. Don't try to think much.

Warm regards.

Tetaeridanus.

[holydarkness]

Hey holydarkness,

I have nothing against you, and also support your mediating actions for this forum as you have said to AHOYBRAUSE.

Let me tell you about politeness; AHOYBRAUSE continues on calling me a "clown" in my thread, what about that?

[...]

Also for the two people you are mentioning on DT; owlcatz is a circus player with that kind of proof for opposing and you know it, and DT should look for this matter.

I won't talk about DaveF because he seems to understand the whole situation wrongly, didn't even read (owlcatz also) that I already got compansated 800 USD for the site's mistake, and why I got it; but continued on blabbering nonesense. I don't think this two oppositions are valid; a 0 IQ monkey would also see this. Don't try to think much.

You can't dictate someone to call you what and/or to treat you in a way that you much preferred. This is an open public forum, literally thousands of people with diversity of background, culture, behavior, preferences, and all that we can think or are probably appeared here.

Far as I know [that's me being low-key saying "I know to a great extent"] that AHOY is a great guy. He has a very strong principle. An amazing one, if I may add, as he's very outspoken... soooo outspoken that he doesn't bother to speak up about the casinos he's currently [in the past] wearing and at times, more than a dozen times, TBH, I had this urge to smack the back of his head with a pan or something else solid.

And reasonable one too.

I don't want to mudding the water, but I believe if you really really read the other people's post history, the other one that he's referring to, with an unbiased eyes, you would agree that he's a bit... interesting, in a sense that I'll leave to free interpretation.

Far as I can observe from a very long and frequent time my path brushed with AHOY, he's not one that will call names first unless the other side started it, or... the situation kinda warrant for it.

While we're at it, not trying to provoke you, but rather to give you a brain exercise and to urge you to learn to see things from several sides before jumping into conclusion, I deliberately snip your post in above fashion as that two parts of your post is related yet the exact opposite.

Won't you agree that if you feel annoyed and entitled to be pissed about AHOY calling you clown, then DaveF and owlcatz are also entitled to feel offended with that 0 IQ monkey and circus player? Especially as all they do is exercising their right to call a judgment over a situation.

Instead, I don't think they even bother.

Much like I ignored the baseless jabs and name-calling that other user repetitively called me across thread [I got notified whenever my name being mentioned].

Why? Because they're fully aware that this is an open forum, this is not an elementary school where telling the teacher that someone scolded you or called you funny names will earn that someone a slap in their wrist. This is the world, thick skin and partially deaf ear is needed.

Take that long-wall-of-text as you will, but that's a genuine benevolent advise, not an attempt to provoke or anything with negative connotation.

Anyways,

"Perhaps at this mental state [no offense] you perceive everything as an attack, or perhaps that's just your default setting."

This is definetely not my default setting, and I am going through a rough emotional time this last months. Thanks for understanding.

From your perspective, if I imagine we are buddies; yes, we are not; hope to be in future. However you do everything a buddy don't do.

You continue on with the "I will tell public if you want" sayings;

Which makes me under spotlight; to accept or not accept both are not ways to go.

That's actually a genuine offer.

Do you want me to do as you previously asked and provide my honest opinion? Mind that [I am not sure how this next sentence can not be perceived as a threat, but rest assured that it is not, it's a simple fact] my opinion is currently locked inside Pandora's Box, a can of worm, spray-bomb money bag, or whichever analogy you prefer.

But no, I don't think anyone will judge you if you tell me to keep my opinion for myself. I don't think they could care less, since they haven't heard about it or have the slightest clue of what I have in mind. Why would they think less about you just because you asked for my opinion, I replied, "uhh... might not a good idea, you bumped your head last night with the juggling cone," and then you say, "shut your mouth."

If you want to watch and see, please do so. But please, don't continue on with these types of messages. I get them wrong, also many will; and I don't want to continue discussing off-topic for both you and my sake.

Nope, TBH, IMHO, no one will get a wrong message of what I tried to convey other than you [the other --if I may borrow AHOY's word-- '"clown" aside, of course, as they're here to throw muds and stir pots and brew a witch concoction]. One of the easiest way to prove this is that none commented or jumping to same conclusion as you when you keep saying that I am threatening you. Maybe they have other reason, but I would like to think and believe that it's because they can see that it's more to "juggling ability" scenario than me threatening you.

I hope you understand my peace offer.


[...]

Warm regards.

Tetaeridanus.

What peace needs an offering?

Like I said here, much that what you said in the past annoyed me [I won't disclose what emergency I had during that time of silence, but I am sure I am entitled to taking myself out of the forum whenever I want or need], I have to have a thicker skin, a selectively deaf ear, and sudden-selective blindness to thrive on this forum where I try to bridge casinos and players, especially when the ruling are against the player's wish. Tantrum are almost always warranted.

I get over it, as long as no more jabs and name calling thrown, because though this skin is thick and this ear is deaf, things can get annoying when it happen during a rainy day [or perhaps I have to say a clear sky and scorching bright sun, since that's the weather that irritates me, I love rainy and cloudy day].

I believe me writing to Razer after they made their second ruling kinda gave it out? If that's not obvious enough?

[tetaeridanus]

You can't dictate someone to call you what and/or to treat you in a way that you much preferred. This is an open public forum, literally thousands of people with diversity of background, culture, behavior, preferences, and all that we can think or are probably appeared here.

Far as I know [that's me being low-key saying "I know to a great extent"] that AHOY is a great guy. He has a very strong principle. An amazing one, if I may add, as he's very outspoken... soooo outspoken that he doesn't bother to speak up about the casinos he's currently [in the past] wearing and at times, more than a dozen times, TBH, I had this urge to smack the back of his head with a pan or something else solid.

And reasonable one too.

I know I can't dictate anybody, as I said 'please' in every word. You can't dictate no one, and no one is entitled to do this, I know that.

For AHOY, I sincerely believe he is a good person; I can feel that, however would be better to see that side of him. I + your sayings about him. I am also a outspoken person like him as well (you have come to terms of it, I know)

I don't want to mudding the water, but I believe if you really really read the other people's post history, the other one that he's referring to, with an unbiased eyes, you would agree that he's a bit... interesting, in a sense that I'll leave to free interpretation.

Far as I can observe from a very long and frequent time my path brushed with AHOY, he's not one that will call names first unless the other side started it, or... the situation kinda warrant for it.

I have read the history and I understand what you are saying; I don't want to tell bad words to a person that is probably grieving financial losses at the moment. I Don't want to comment on it since, I don't know if his accusation is valid or not; but I get the idea of what you mean. I approve his support on my case and his nice words to me , though.

While we're at it, not trying to provoke you, but rather to give you a brain exercise and to urge you to learn to see things from several sides before jumping into conclusion, I deliberately snip your post in above fashion as that two parts of your post is related yet the exact opposite.

Won't you agree that if you feel annoyed and entitled to be pissed about AHOY calling you clown, then DaveF and owlcatz are also entitled to feel offended with that 0 IQ monkey and circus player? Especially as all they do is exercising their right to call a judgment over a situation.

Instead, I don't think they even bother.

Much like I ignored the baseless jabs and name-calling that other user repetitively called me across thread [I got notified whenever my name being mentioned].

Why? Because they're fully aware that this is an open forum, this is not an elementary school where telling the teacher that someone scolded you or called you funny names will earn that someone a slap in their wrist. This is the world, thick skin and partially deaf ear is needed.

Take that long-wall-of-text as you will, but that's a genuine benevolent advise, not an attempt to provoke or anything with negative connotation.

I don't think it as a long-wall-of-text; I read every word you write to me, don't mix me with other people please.

That's actually a genuine offer.

Do you want me to do as you previously asked and provide my honest opinion? Mind that [I am not sure how this next sentence can not be perceived as a threat, but rest assured that it is not, it's a simple fact] my opinion is currently locked inside Pandora's Box, a can of worm, spray-bomb money bag, or whichever analogy you prefer.

But no, I don't think anyone will judge you if you tell me to keep my opinion for myself. I don't think they could care less, since they haven't heard about it or have the slightest clue of what I have in mind. Why would they think less about you just because you asked for my opinion, I replied, "uhh... might not a good idea, you bumped your head last night with the juggling cone," and then you say, "shut your mouth."

You can do whatever you believe is the best way to do. I won't am not entitled to say anything about this. Thanks for asking it.

Whatever you find is respected.

Nope, TBH, IMHO, no one will get a wrong message of what I tried to convey other than you [the other --if I may borrow AHOY's word-- '"clown" aside, of course, as they're here to throw muds and stir pots and brew a witch concoction]. One of the easiest way to prove this is that none commented or jumping to same conclusion as you when you keep saying that I am threatening you. Maybe they have other reason, but I would like to think and believe that it's because they can see that it's more to "juggling ability" scenario than me threatening you.

Well said, but it wasn't seen like that from my side, thanks for giving detailed explanation about this.

What peace needs an offering?

Like I said here, much that what you said in the past annoyed me [I won't disclose what emergency I had during that time of silence, but I am sure I am entitled to taking myself out of the forum whenever I want or need], I have to have a thicker skin, a selectively deaf ear, and sudden-selective blindness to thrive on this forum where I try to bridge casinos and players, especially when the ruling are against the player's wish. Tantrum are almost always warranted.

I get over it, as long as no more jabs and name calling thrown, because though this skin is thick and this ear is deaf, things can get annoying when it happen during a rainy day [or perhaps I have to say a clear sky and scorching bright sun, since that's the weather that irritates me, I love rainy and cloudy day].

I believe me writing to Razer after they made their second ruling kinda gave it out? If that's not obvious enough?

Yes, thanks for your PM to him; even tough i don't have any details about it, I believe you have tried the best you could. About the past, I am sorry for my foul language and bad actions again.

I hope to hear from you again.

Tetaeridanus.