Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 09:38:25 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Any counter-proof that Satoshi Nakamoto did not design a ponzi scheme on purpose?
Yes (i've provided my Occam Razor proof in comments) - 15 (19.2%)
No (it can't be refuted) - 9 (11.5%)
I don't know - 5 (6.4%)
I don't care - 16 (20.5%)
STFU - 21 (26.9%)
I hate you - 9 (11.5%)
Other (described in comments) - 3 (3.8%)
Total Voters: 78

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Any counter-proof that Satoshi Nakamoto did not design a ponzi scheme on purpose  (Read 7693 times)
AnonyMint (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 521


View Profile
March 27, 2013, 08:23:10 AM
Last edit: March 27, 2013, 09:04:34 AM by AnonyMint
 #201

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/876/how-much-will-transaction-fees-eventually-be/8749?noredirect=1#comment11471_8749

Quote
@HighlyIrregular Sure it scales now that we have the revelation that the mega-corporations will do the mining as a loss-leader to monopolize. But the 3% for credit cards will be nothing compared to the 100% or more once there same monopoly controlling both processing and retailing. Before at least the retailers were fighting the credit cards, now they will be one in same and we will become absolutely slaves and destitute. You Bitcoin developers are not thinking clearly.

I don't understand all the vested interests here.

I suppose you just have a lot of money in Bitcoin and mining hardware.

I suppose most of you don't believe there is a real threat of corporations taking over all control of your ability to transact.

I don't think it will help for me to force it down your throat.

MoonShadow, I appreciate that information very much. You confirmed my fears. Occam's Razor was telling me that it had to be so, and you confirmed it. Now I realize that many of you will think I am paranoid or delusional. That is okay. By the time it is too late, you will say "I wish I listened to Shelby".

But of course it will be too late then. So there is nothing I can do.

I wish all of you the best. I wish no harm will come to you. And I don't wish to destroy your speculations. I wish you good luck with them.

















New Zealand Prepares to Stealsthe Moneys

Last week we notified our clients that plans have been in place for some time in New
Zealand to be able to declare a bank holiday and instantly haircut all depositors.
As it turns out, this can be done with as little as “a few mouse clicks.”

AFE’s inside source (a senior developer for one of New Zealand’s largest banks)
confirms that these plansstarted some time ago. According to this source’s personal
knowledge of the system’s implementation, which facilitates instant theft on behalf
of the government, this project was initiated years ago. Interestingly, it was the
Reserve Bank of New Zealand that instructed all banks to put this system in place as
well as providing the deadline as to when it had to be implemented.

AFE’s Duncan Cameron says, “You don’t build bridges to nowhere with no plan on
walking them.”

“If depositor’s funds are protected up to €100K, and anyone holding deposits over
that amount has to bail out their bank if that bank  gets into trouble, it will set
a precedent for other banks’ depositors worldwide who have deposits over the
insurable amounts within those nations!

In Australia and the USA, the insurable amount is $250K for any single entity
(person); therefore, any one entity over the insurable limit could be subject to
similar scenarios.

Basically, from a legal standpoint, this has shifted the liability of customer banks
deposits from central banks to the banks’ depositors themselves. The legality of
this shift in liability will have a significant effect in the days ahead, I am
sure.” - comments AFE's Treasury Director, Simon Heapes, in the office this morning
regarding the current situation.

Few Places Still Safe for Substantial Wealth

How many other jurisdictions already have these type of plans either on the drawing
board or in process? I think it is a legitimate question to ask at this point.Anyone
who has followed what we have said over the years knows we have warned people to
take measures to protect their wealth:

1.       Place a core position of wealth in gold and/or silver, which is purchased
and held outside of the banking system. This prevents such “instant confiscations,”
protects from bank failures, and allows a person to weather inflation and still have
access to liquidity if cash is needed quickly.

2.       Diversify wealth internationally so if the government of your jurisdiction
feels it is necessary to confiscate the wealth within its reach, at least they won’t
get all of it.

3.       Open bank accounts in other jurisdictions to allow options and access to
cashflow should the banks you hold your cash with go into a bank holiday, and you
find yourself with limited options.

It is important to ask yourself some very serious questions. If you have more than
the government-insured limit in any bank, have you diversified your wealth
geopolitically to where you will not lose everything from the failure of one
nation’s banking system? Have you taken steps to protect yourself versus the
confiscation of wealth that occurs when governments are out of options?

If you have not, we encourage you to take the necessary action needed now while you
still can.History shows that capital controls and increased taxation are always put
in place as a government’s fiscal situation continues to deteriorate. At some point
you may not be able to legally secure your wealth at all outside the reach of a
failing government if you do not take the needed steps today.

Kind regards,
Alex Stanczyk
Chief Market Strategist
Anglo Far-East

unheresy.com - Prodigiously Elucidating the Profoundly ObtuseTHIS FORUM ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
Korbman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 27, 2013, 12:32:11 PM
 #202

You are batshit stupid.

New Topic:

Any counter-proof that AnonyMint is not batshit insane?

The reason I am so warlike in this discussion, is because I understand that the future of our human race is at stake.

Question posed and answered.

Anyway, why is this thread still growing? Anony rage quit on page 8 (twice)..yet still comes back to argue the same points (this time with a global mod)?

MoonShadow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007



View Profile
March 27, 2013, 01:11:47 PM
 #203

Anyway, why is this thread still growing? Anony rage quit on page 8 (twice)..yet still comes back to argue the same points (this time with a global mod)?

You make a good point, I should have locked this thread already.  In my own defense, I'm inclined to let posters speak their mind as much as possible, even those who too readily let their crazy out for all to see.

But with that, this thread is now locked.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!