Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 12:12:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-11-21]Will Quantum Computers Be the End of Bitcoin?  (Read 595 times)
WishICanTurnBackTime (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 21, 2016, 02:39:22 PM
 #1

Will Quantum Computers Be the End of Bitcoin?

Quantum computers, for all of their press, will not be used in everyday applications such as running word processors or playing games. Rather,
they will help with large data processing tasks and problem solving. However, while most individuals on this planet only have positive intentions for such inventions, there are others who have malicious intentions.
Quantum computers have an incredible ability to perform multiple calculations simultaneously, unlike conventional computers. For example, modern computers could never brute force hack a 256-bit key by going through every combination whereas a quantum computer could achieve this with ease.
To put the speed difference into perspective, Google's D-Wave 2X quantum computer can solve algorithms 100,000,000 faster than modern computing devices. This means that brute force attacks on security protocols will suddenly become viable which will cause serious issues with global finance, computing, and information as a whole. So it comes as no surprise that Bitcoin is at serious risk from quantum computers becoming commonplace.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/news/will-quantum-computers-be-the-end-of-bitcoin/
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3157


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
November 21, 2016, 05:56:53 PM
 #2

Typical click-bait headline.  If it's the end of Bitcoin, it's also the end of fiat.  The entire legacy finance sector relies on encryption too.  I almost didn't bother reading the article as a result of the title, because it's just getting tiresome now, but read it to see if they got around to acknowledging the fact that everything is vulnerable to something that can crack encryption.  Got there in the end.   Undecided

I'm also inclined to speculate that Bitcoin will be faster to react to the problem than the banks will.  We're the ones on the bleeding edge here.  Can't say I'm all that concerned.

.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3262
Merit: 2442



View Profile WWW
November 21, 2016, 06:01:22 PM
 #3

This has been brought many times before. I was also worried about this but i see the experts in this forum say the otherwise. So, the answer is no. Quantum Computing can't harm or hack bitcoin system.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422



View Profile
November 21, 2016, 06:15:48 PM
 #4

This has been brought many times before. I was also worried about this but i see the experts in this forum say the otherwise. So, the answer is no. Quantum Computing can't harm or hack bitcoin system.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1645557.msg16579832#msg16579832

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1647214.0

I post the above as a reference for those who are interested in discover a bit more. And by the way don't be afraid of quantum computing Smiley
tyz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 1531



View Profile
November 21, 2016, 07:36:06 PM
 #5

Each year a new article about the danger of Quantum Computer for Bitcoin.

I felt this familiar and I searched my old threads and here we are  Cheesy
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1202042.0
Priam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 21, 2016, 07:40:47 PM
 #6

Well, that is frightening me a bit, but there's bigger than Bitcoin to attack, as pointed above. Also, I think that some solutions will be found if it reveals to be a real threat.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 3247



View Profile
November 21, 2016, 10:27:14 PM
 #7

This has been brought many times before. I was also worried about this but i see the experts in this forum say the otherwise. So, the answer is no. Quantum Computing can't harm or hack bitcoin system.

Anyone that says that "quantum computing can't harm or hack bitcoin system" is obviously not an expert.

The danger is real. While quantum computing is still in an experimental state now, the companies developing quantum computers expect the computational power to double every year. SHA-256 and ECC are expected to be broken in as soon as 10 years, and certainly less than 20 years.

Each year a new article about the danger of Quantum Computer for Bitcoin.

I felt this familiar and I searched my old threads and here we are  Cheesy
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1202042.0

These articles keep coming up because the danger is real and looming. Pretending that it doesn't exist won't make it go away.

If it's the end of Bitcoin, it's also the end of fiat.  The entire legacy finance sector relies on encryption too. ...

That's like writing, "I don't care if I die because everyone else is going to die, too."

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
DooMAD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3157


Leave no FUD unchallenged


View Profile
November 22, 2016, 12:33:25 AM
 #8

If it's the end of Bitcoin, it's also the end of fiat.  The entire legacy finance sector relies on encryption too. ...

That's like writing, "I don't care if I die because everyone else is going to die, too."

Not when you're implying later in the same post that someone is bound to come up with a fix due to what's at stake.  No one's denying it's a serious risk if we let it happen, but I don't think we're foolish enough to let things reach that point.  As soon as the notion became a possibility that something could crack encryption, keener minds than mine were already thinking up potential solutions.  If you know what's coming, it's easier to defend against.  It wouldn't surprise me if it was someone (or a group of someones) here in the crypto community who solves it.  I'm fairly confident anti-quantum algorithms will probably be a reality before quantum itself becomes an issue.

And again, it was mostly just pointing out stupid clickbait headline is stupid.



.
.HUGE.
▄██████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄███████████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████▌██▌▐██▐██▐████▄███
████▐██▐████▌██▌██▌██▌██
█████▀███▀███▀▐██▐██▐█████

▀█████████████████████████▀

▀███████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████████▀

▀█████████████████▀

▀██████████▀▀
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
CASINSPORTSBOOK
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
kryptqnick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1389


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
November 22, 2016, 10:17:54 AM
 #9

I heard the news that quantum computer is sort of already created but it is still not that powerful. I don't believe scientists can invent such a thing. And even if they do... We can see here http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2847/how-long-would-it-take-a-large-computer-to-crack-a-private-key that it would take 0.65 billion billion years for our computers to do so. If quantum computer is 100 000 faster then instead of 6.5*10^17 years it would take 6.5*10^12 which doesn't make much difference.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
panju1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 22, 2016, 03:51:09 PM
 #10

I heard the news that quantum computer is sort of already created but it is still not that powerful. I don't believe scientists can invent such a thing. And even if they do... We can see here http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2847/how-long-would-it-take-a-large-computer-to-crack-a-private-key that it would take 0.65 billion billion years for our computers to do so. If quantum computer is 100 000 faster then instead of 6.5*10^17 years it would take 6.5*10^12 which doesn't make much difference.

Even if quantum computers are developed to crack asymmetric cryptographic problems in reasonable amounts of time, we can move to an quantum-computer resistant algorithm to secure Bitcoin.
An earlier article explaining the same..

https://cointelegraph.com/news/the-arrival-of-quantum-computing-threat-to-bitcoin
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 3247



View Profile
November 22, 2016, 06:50:24 PM
Last edit: November 22, 2016, 07:12:08 PM by odolvlobo
 #11

I heard the news that quantum computer is sort of already created but it is still not that powerful. I don't believe scientists can invent such a thing. And even if they do... We can see here http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2847/how-long-would-it-take-a-large-computer-to-crack-a-private-key that it would take 0.65 billion billion years for our computers to do so. If quantum computer is 100 000 faster then instead of 6.5*10^17 years it would take 6.5*10^12 which doesn't make much difference.

Unfortunately, it isn't that easy to dismiss. There are two factors: the computational speed and the algorithm.

A quantum computer using a simple brute force algorithm like what might be done on current computers indeed would not be a problem. However, quantum computers are especially suited for using a different algorithm that reduces the computation time by a huge factor.

An analogy

The time to search an unsorted array is described as Θ(n), which means the average number of operations is proportional to the number of items in the array. In contrast, the time to search a sorted array is Θ(log n).

Let's compare times assuming that an operation takes 1 ns (1/1000000000 second).

CountUnsorted OpsSorted OpsTime Comparison
1010310 ns vs. 3 ns
10001000101000 ns vs. 10 ns
1 million1 million201000000 ns vs. 20 ns
10121012401000 second vs. 0.000000040 seconds
212821281281020 centuries vs. 0.000000128 seconds

The algorithm makes all the difference in the world. Please note that the times are not actual times, and there is quite a bit of hand waving.

In the end, as panju1 and DooMAD noted, a solution is to switch to a "quantum-resistant" cryptography. However, quantum-resistant cryptography is still being developed, and the danger is that quantum computers will be able to break current cryptography (including Bitcoin) before quantum-resistant cryptography can be developed.
 

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!