China Builds New Military Facilities in South China Sea

[Sithara007]

The Chinese are having dispute with all of it's neighbours and it's not new to them. Can you find Tibet on the map now.? No. Because China is occupying it illegally. Only if all of the neighbors of China teams up then only it'll be controlled and it is necessary actually.

Yeah, everyone knows that how china has illegally and forcefully occupied Tibet. In the past, India lodged their protest and supported independence of tibet but when sikkim became part of india, china refused to acknowledge it. Later on both countries came to mutual agreement , wherein china acknowledged sikkim as a part of india and India acknowledged tibet as a part of China.

Sikkim decided to join India after 98% of the people supported the move in a referendum. On the other hand, China forcibly invaded Tibet during the 1950s, killing tens of thousands of Tibetan civilians. That is the difference between Sikkim and Tibet.

[wearepoor]

The Chinese are having dispute with all of it's neighbours and it's not new to them. Can you find Tibet on the map now.? No. Because China is occupying it illegally. Only if all of the neighbors of China teams up then only it'll be controlled and it is necessary actually.

Yeah, everyone knows that how china has illegally and forcefully occupied Tibet. In the past, India lodged their protest and supported independence of tibet but when sikkim became part of india, china refused to acknowledge it. Later on both countries came to mutual agreement , wherein china acknowledged sikkim as a part of india and India acknowledged tibet as a part of China.

Sikkim decided to join India after 98% of the people supported the move in a referendum. On the other hand, China forcibly invaded Tibet during the 1950s, killing tens of thousands of Tibetan civilians. That is the difference between Sikkim and Tibet.

Agreed with you mate, there is lot of difference between Tibet and Sikkim. I just want to clarify that, India will not support for the independence of Tibet as the situation has been changed now. If they do so, china will counter back with the support for independence of Sikkim and Kashmir.

[cherryganda]

They are being bully to small countries! they know that those country has no capability to fight in war thats why iit is always want to be on peaceful talk like the philippines .. though the arbitral gave the rights to the Philippines they still insist their rights but theres no right for them it is just called south china sea but it is really a philippines sea and with the PAR of that country .. what will be next sstep of china and who will be the enemy of CHINA ??

[BTCmax24]

Why China building military facility in the South China Sea? Its because of US in appropriate attitude towards China. This US is bullying China and selfish country that want to control everything. Why super power country want to become morw powerful? Because they want to defend their sovereig countrt from other super power. So this is the result why China built new military facilities in West Philippine Sea. This is between two superpowers and not between Philippines, Vietnam nor Malaysia. It happena because of US presence in the Asia.

[Sithara007]

Agreed with you mate, there is lot of difference between Tibet and Sikkim. I just want to clarify that, India will not support for the independence of Tibet as the situation has been changed now. If they do so, china will counter back with the support for independence of Sikkim and Kashmir.

There is a big difference between Sikkim and Tibet. The people of Sikkim don't want to be independent. The state is having a Hindu majority, and they are happy being a part of India. But that is not the case with Tibet. Even now, there is a lot of support for independence there. And talking about Kashmir, it is true that the majority of the population want to secede from India.

[sonicwave]

They have every right to do this. When such an unstable situation in the world, and also the neighboring country, which scares all with nuclear weapons, the construction of military facilities is justified.