Prices for listing on diffrent exchanges

[ajdaj]

These are your speculations? The reality is not the price you give. To be listed on major exchanges, the coin must be really good and have a large community. Not every penny can be listed in binance for 50btc.

Perhaps there is some interest in pointing first to very weak stock exchanges for listing, so that by using lower trading, you can buy coins from sellers with a good outlook at an affordable price. And even then go to more rated exchanges.

[loveblack]

Binance is the most influential exchange . at Binance , the price of coins can be raised , the volume of transactions will become bigger . these are temporary . decentralized exchanges quickly replaced them .

[Sabinas17]

Binance - 50 BTC
Poloniex - 30/50 BTC
COSS - 40 BTC
KuCoin - 30 BTC
HitBTC - 45 BTC
Cryptopia - 15 BTC
CoinExchange - 2/4 BTC
LiveCoin - 4 BTC
btc-alpha - 3 BTC
Meratox - 2 BTC
Crypto.bridge - 1 BTC
YoBit - 2 BTC
Stocks.Exchange - 1 BTC
Crex24 - 0.15BTC
BitFex.trade - 0.15BTC

to be honest, I thought that the listing on the binance is much higher than the price, for such a large and promising exchange of such money it is not a pity, if the project raised good funds for the ICO, then why not?

[CoinEraser]

Binance - 50 BTC
Poloniex - 30/50 BTC
COSS - 40 BTC
KuCoin - 30 BTC
HitBTC - 45 BTC
Cryptopia - 15 BTC
CoinExchange - 2/4 BTC
LiveCoin - 4 BTC
btc-alpha - 3 BTC
Meratox - 2 BTC
Crypto.bridge - 1 BTC
YoBit - 2 BTC
Stocks.Exchange - 1 BTC
Crex24 - 0.15BTC
BitFex.trade - 0.15BTC

to be honest, I thought that the listing on the binance is much higher than the price, for such a large and promising exchange of such money it is not a pity, if the project raised good funds for the ICO, then why not?

I think 50 Bitcoins is a too high price. A small but maybe good project, does not always collect so much money in a ICO. Some projects do not have a ICO and therefore not so much capital to ever be listed there. Although I understand that Binance want to keep scam and bad projects away from the exchange with the high price, but that could be achieved with a lower price. I know just the times, in which one could list a coin for free. Maybe that's why I find it too expensive. 

[h0lybyte]

If this information is all correct, it would be so easy for ICO developers to decide which exchange they may afford to list their coin on.
Among all these exchanges, livecoin is quite new, probably a year old but it has covered huge active traders in a brief period. I like their easy and one click swap  trading interface

[PROdotBITCOIN]

I'm very surprised. I never thought that listing on the exchange is also worth a lot of money. Now I understand why many small coins are not listed to large exchanges for a very long time. It's just very expensive.

[miningnew]

“Centralized exchanges are Evil” Vitalik said...

[goyald2801]

in the given list Binance showing 50 btc for listing and hitbtc 45 btc . so do you think anyone will go with hitbtc to save 5 btc ? never ever .
Neither binance have such low fees nor people will pay equivalent fee as of binance to hitbtc type exchanges . It must be old price list when binance was new or getting popularity slowly .

[cryptaxo]

“Centralized exchanges are Evil” Vitalik said...

exactly, and true DEX is with atomic swaps. no other DEX can be a true DEX, coz they control the gateways (centralized) and hence control all your coins. in my view only difference is name and/or KYC for large investments. otherwise DEX these days are actually centralized.

[aervin11]

IF this post is true (I didn't find any source so I won't clearly believe this) now I understand how it is so hard for tokens to get a listing even after they get Millions of dollars after ICO. Money works

[yndye]

I'm very surprised. I never thought that listing on the exchange is also worth a lot of money. Now I understand why many small coins are not listed to large exchanges for a very long time. It's just very expensive.

Yes getting listed in exchanges is pretty expensive that's why some developers even ask its members to have a contribution or donation so that they can at least get listed in exchanges so that their coin can gain more exposure. Some would double or triple their effort to get listed by the community vote seeing how much those exchanges charged. This is the reason why decentralized exchanges has thousands of coins while those centralized ones has fewer coins.

[cryptaxo]

IF this post is true (I didn't find any source so I won't clearly believe this) now I understand how it is so hard for tokens to get a listing even after they get Millions of dollars after ICO. Money works

money and project quality works.

[Xuaquing141]

Now, I understand why the Altcoin often list on the small exchange, because of the small fee. New projects attracting budget are not so much to spend on the exchange is often narrow so choose the small exchange is also a way to save budget. However, the small exchange, with small volume and less users are also the reason why altcoin projects are not really potential to go dead.

[chocolah29]

Binance - 50 BTC
Poloniex - 30/50 BTC
COSS - 40 BTC
KuCoin - 30 BTC
HitBTC - 45 BTC
Cryptopia - 15 BTC
CoinExchange - 2/4 BTC
LiveCoin - 4 BTC
btc-alpha - 3 BTC
Meratox - 2 BTC
Crypto.bridge - 1 BTC
YoBit - 2 BTC
Stocks.Exchange - 1 BTC
Crex24 - 0.15BTC
BitFex.trade - 0.15BTC

I think some of them offer  VOTING SYSTEM too. You should mention that too. e.g. Binance and mercatox

Yes and some accept ICO tokens with additional bitcoin upon listing. And not to mention binance that they just listed those that were really good and promising project.

Hence, many anticipate that when a coin will be listed in binance it will skyrocketed unbeknownst to them it's just a hype.