Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 01:25:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: KnCminer thermal simulation  (Read 1249 times)
Puppet (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
September 18, 2013, 07:26:05 AM
 #1

Saw this on KnC's website:



https://www.kncminer.com/images/rnd/Slide8.png

WTH, the die is simulated to reach ~200C? And that despite a monster cooler and relatively cool 25C airflow?

Now you may say its only a simulation or they have tweaked the cooling/packaging since, but then why would you put that simulation on your website?
Besides, it would take more than tweaking to reduce the temp from 200C to something sane.

Has KNC said anything about this?

JoelKatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012


Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2013, 07:31:46 AM
 #2

I'm pretty sure that's F, not C. And you typically run the simulation until the die reaches its temperature limit to see how much power is being dissipated when you hit it and what can be improved. For example, if the die hits 100C and the heat sink is only a few degrees above ambient, you know that air flow isn't worth improving.

When rating a cooling solution, the big question you want answered is -- how many watts can my die generate without hitting its limit? Good solutions make that number high. Bad ones make it low. So that's the condition you want to analyze.

I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz
1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
Puppet (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
September 18, 2013, 07:37:10 AM
 #3

I considered the possibility of it being fahrenheit, but then it would be cooled with subzero (Celsius) air, which doesnt make a lot of sense and it would still reach 100+C over ambient, hardly reassuring.

That they would be simulating with an exaggerated  power until maximum temp is reached is more believable, but again thats not the picture Id put on my website.
Photon939
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 452
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 18, 2013, 12:21:28 PM
 #4

I'm pretty sure that's F, not C. And you typically run the simulation until the die reaches its temperature limit to see how much power is being dissipated when you hit it and what can be improved. For example, if the die hits 100C and the heat sink is only a few degrees above ambient, you know that air flow isn't worth improving.

When rating a cooling solution, the big question you want answered is -- how many watts can my die generate without hitting its limit? Good solutions make that number high. Bad ones make it low. So that's the condition you want to analyze.

An air cooled system simulation with intake air below freezing? Is this a simulation for running bitcoin miners in Antarctica?
markm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2013, 12:23:27 PM
 #5

This again? What happened to the existing thread that already went into this?

-MarkM-

Browser-launched Crossfire client now online (select CrossCiv server for Galactic  Milieu)
Free website hosting with PHP, MySQL etc: http://hosting.knotwork.com/
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 18, 2013, 05:31:19 PM
 #6

you're right Puppet, it ain't gonna work.   Glad you caught that, everyone (but you, of course) can cancel their orders now

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 18, 2013, 06:16:20 PM
 #7

If I remember this slide correctly, the simulation is only for the heatsink's performance characteristics not the die.

1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!