Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 02:05:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: easyminer vs BFGminer hashing variation with BFL little single  (Read 2390 times)
pandemic (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 12:07:04 AM
 #1

Hey everybody!

I'm running a BFL little single that runs at about 30gh/s. I'm running through Eclipse MC and am getting strange variations when I use bfgminer vs easyminer.

In easyminer, I'm averaging 33gh/s on the pool side, 30.5gh/s on the miner side.
In bfgminer, I'm getting about 28.5gh/s at the pool and about the same on the miner.

I realize that I'm likely getting a max of 30.5gh/s but I'm wondering why there's a 2gh/s difference in bfgminer vs easyminer.

Any suggestions?
Zanatos666
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


Sometimes man, just sometimes.....


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 01:03:49 PM
 #2

Probably not since Easyminer really is just a pretty GUI interface that runs BFG in the background.  As for the pool side, thats just an estimate on your hashrate depending on the amount of shares you submit during a snapshot time period (usually like 15 minutes). So if you turn out some lucky shares/solve some higher difficulty shares/the pool isnt reporting shares and needs to catch up then that can be affected (I have had my Jalapeno clock in at nearly 20GH before because the pool took a while to record all of my shares that when it did it seemed as though I was hashing at a much higher rate).

Squiggly letters, written really fast, with a couple of dots for good measure.
pandemic (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 01, 2013, 07:27:13 PM
 #3

I think it's more than that though. When I run the same pool on easyminer, it shows a relatively steady 30.4gh/s and the pool reflects that. When I run the same pool in bfgminer, it shows as being all over. The last time I ran it it was showing 25gh/s. The pool was showing 29.3 or something. Still, there's a large difference and I'm not sure how to optimize bfgminer.
TR4L
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10



View Profile
October 12, 2013, 04:02:16 AM
 #4

Probably not since Easyminer really is just a pretty GUI interface that runs BFG in the background.  As for the pool side, thats just an estimate on your hashrate depending on the amount of shares you submit during a snapshot time period (usually like 15 minutes). So if you turn out some lucky shares/solve some higher difficulty shares/the pool isnt reporting shares and needs to catch up then that can be affected (I have had my Jalapeno clock in at nearly 20GH before because the pool took a while to record all of my shares that when it did it seemed as though I was hashing at a much higher rate).

Dude, totally unrelated but:  I LOVE your profile pick.  Akuma is awesome.  Done...
ly2xxx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 04:10:50 PM
 #5

I am seeing the same problem too, and wondering if someone has found the answer why the ASIC miner achieves higher rate in Easyminer than BFGminer?
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 2240


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 04:13:38 PM
 #6

Have you tried putting your unit in the freezer for 15 minutes before firing up BFGMiner? Sometimes different numbers of chips can come up, that might be it.

C
ly2xxx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 04:31:14 PM
 #7

Are you serious about putting it in freezer? Tongue
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 2240


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 17, 2014, 04:44:18 PM
 #8

Yes. But I don't know why. Cooling the unit can sometimes cause more engines to come online, likewise power cycling a hot unit can cause chips to come up again at slightly lower speeds.

Ergo, 15 mins in the freezer if things are odd. This fixes a lot of types of hw stuff.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!