Yes,,, but you missed my point, by saying. This site does NOT like you admit, show all the projects. It seems to pick and choose. Are you telling me honestly Danhua Capital or Collinstar are better because they perform more in ROI? You should look at some clear ponzi tokens and see they are performing better than all of those above in terms of ROI.
My point is that price is not everything, if you must look at price, then you must know what data range and what criteria sites like that show. Amazix has 95+ projects, EEA has hundreds. Is it fair to take less than 10% of their projects to measure? How many projects does Danhua or Collin have? How many of these projects have working products and people using them? What are the objectives of Danhua vs Amazix? Amazix job is not to make money, by the way.
ROI is NOT the measure, unless you are only interested in speculating. If so, then you should look for trading signals,,, not startup management. People are so strange that they pick ROI as measure of services. If you are a signal provider or trading solution, yes ROI is your measure of success.
I really dislike people who cry because they claim they work hard to get money but they do nothing for the project, because they do not work hard at all. They just trade dump and speculate. How many token/bounty hunters support p2p payment? How many use the platforms they shill? Almost none (in fact I know no one). They brought this bear market and they are looking for people to blame, because they are so much in denial that their actions caused the price dump.
These people so happily said Amazix was great when they made thousands of dollars of tokens, and now they turn their back. Because they didn't earn well.
P,S, even scam tokens and ponzi tokens have positive ROI before they die. Take any moment to pick, come back when the bull market is here, and see how the stats change.
I think you can not accept the obvious truth - AmaZix is horrible
Are you somehow connected with this project?
AmaZix was in partnership with a lot of questionable projects. It's no surprise that Hypernum does not want to add such garbage to its database.
And have you heard that people are as negative about Danhua Capital or Collinstarb as they speak about AmaZix? Me not. And I pointed you out, one of the reasons why people have a bad opinion about AmaZix ... You missed it, for some reason.
«Amazix has 95+ projects, EEA has hundreds. Is it fair to take less than 10% of their projects to measure?»
AmaZix has 71 projects (and most of them are garbage), Hypernum has 14 of them (the best of what they have).
Are you sure that 14 from 71 or 95 is less than 10%?
Why are you constantly trying to whitewash AmaZix? They pays you?
«How many projects does Danhua or Collin have?»
As far as I know, in the Hypernum database, partnership and investment relations are formed only when the projects themselves or funds confirm their relationship. Moreover, Hypernum was created quite recently and the growth of their database, with the display of more complete statistical information, is a matter of time.
"How many of these projects have working products and people using them?"
If we consider that most ICO projects ended recently, they will not release a full-fledged product soon. It's natural.
"Amazix job is not to make money, by the way."
Are you sure? They recently stated that they earned more than a billion on their investments. True or not, I do not know. But the fact that they are trying to earn money, it's obvious.
ROI is just the beginning. I'm sure that gradually Hypernum will introduce more and more statistical indicators. It's a very young project, it's only a few months old.
Also, I'm sure that with the growth in the number of indicators, negative statistics on AmaZix will be maintained because the project itself is bad.
