So you support the OP creating this thread well the person is banned and unable to speak for his side of the issue?
There is nothing to speak about; he was a spammer. The proof is in his posts, which are public for everyone to read. There are no excuses for spamming, especially while he was getting paid for it.
The problem with a lot of these responses attacking my view on the issue is they do not take everything into account.
A allegation against a banned member,made by a alt account when he could not represent himself.
If you want this forum to conduct business in this way,its no longer about some ones reputation and a feeding ground for smear campaigns.
The allegations where settled in meta and the accused understood and stated that he understood. Soon after this thread opens up once he can no longer speak on the issue. So why are we encouraging some one that has not even come back to the thread to make these attacks after the fact?
Not making a case for him but think its unfair to do attacks on members no matter how deep the evidence.
Just looked at the accused posts and it looks like it will be a short time before he is banned again.
There is nothing to speak about; he was a spammer. The proof is in his posts, which are public for everyone to read. There are no excuses for spamming, especially while he was getting paid for it.
He is back again but never bothered to reply here or in his Meta thread where he brought up the issue with other shit posting account.Maybe he is too busy dealing with his little signature campaign business.
Doubt he even knows this thread exsists,I find a lot of off the cuff remarks about me in threads by accident most of the time.
Most people do not expect to end up in this forum or know it is even here.
