Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 02:48:57 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: there was an idea to protect from attack Bitcoin 51%  (Read 607 times)
6408B6FB876E (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 07:20:16 PM
 #1

there was an idea to protect from attack Bitcoin 51%
threat which arose recently

offer the following items
that if geniratsii blocks 51 % of the capacity of all miners will be sent to
call it pooll insurance (SP*) from which automatically will be charged back to the bitcoin
remuneration for the creation of unit
which should avoid creating fictitious chains

ie creates monopoly power that does not belong to no one and its size (capacity)
does not give it to others to attack 51%

( desirable to eliminate the ability to influence the SP* member )
just make a confirmation transaction two factorial
that is confirmed by the transactions are confirmed and the rest of the joint venture purses
well, SP* smudge on clients (which is kind of on a decentralized pool)

or alternatively, a centralized and transparent and accessible to all
should work like ( say me if i wrong )

I apologize in advance for my English is not my native language
6408B6FB876E (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 07:34:59 PM
 #2

here is my original post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408807.0
&
https://forum.btcsec.com/index.php?/topic/4491-ugroza-51-i-chto-s-nei-delat/
impulsecorp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 08:16:26 PM
 #3

This article from yesterday has some pretty good info about the 51% attack problem:
http://pando.com/2014/01/09/crypto-currency-coup-bitcoin-network-survives-power-play-by-rapidly-growing-ghash-io-mining-pool/
6408B6FB876E (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 08:32:09 PM
 #4

thanks for the link
I'm not sure you understand me correctly
I understand the danger of the problem 51%

and suggest how it seems to me a solution.
  which is to arrange all participants in the game
automatically exclude the threat of such an attack
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!