About For Bitcoin Detector, satoshi nakamoto.

[cryptofarid10]

He satoshi nakamoto. Bitcoin Detector
He come from Australia.
He said
 It is my right not to say I did something. If I released a paper that actually benefits people. why do I have to actually take credit for it? Why do l? I don't work and invent and write papers and code. by coming in front of TVs. I don't want money, I don't want fame, I don't want adoration I just want to be left alone. I've deployed enough and I'm happy where I am. I'm not looking for money. And this is one comment I want to make to people. I don't want money, I don't want help. And I'm categorically going to say this..

[The Cryptovator]

I don't think he is Satoshi. It's become very difficult to prove who is Satoshi originally unless he sign message from his Bitcoin address. Also there will be question which address really hold by satoshi.

Personally I believe Satoshi isn't just a person. Satoshi is a name of community, Satoshi is a name of brand. That's the reason behind it why still no one can proved who is Satoshi.

[Lauda]

CW displayed absolutely no common traits with the user Satoshi. He is a proven fraud. Anyone who believes this baboon is Satoshi is an idiot.

https://youtu.be/2Rzcgpdj7SA?t=91
"Satoshi".
Why is this in Meta? Attempting to fetch some merits?

[Marshall14]

This is just a deliberate plan to gain popularity,and everyone including you@OP should know this guy ain't satoshi,except you just posted this for the sake of it

Personally I believe Satoshi isn't just a person. Satoshi is a name of community, Satoshi is a name of brand. That's the reason behind it why still no one can proved who is Satoshi.

No one can really be sure about this,he could well be a single individual,the more reason why we should simply embrace the "new world" technology and try not to think about who or where the creator is..

Why is this in Meta? Attempting to fetch some merits?

I wouldn't doubt that..
I can't even see the section this fits into

[xtraelv]

Craig Wright is not Satoshi.

Satoshi annoyed:

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

Sigh... why delete a wallet instead of moving it aside and keeping the old copy just in case?  You should never delete a wallet.

Sorry to be a wet blanket.   Writing a description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard.   There's nothing to relate it to.

https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/167/

Craig Wright annoyed:



Craig Wright does not have the linguistic skills, writing style and calm demeanor of Satoshi. Craig Wright - put simply - is a twat.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4505532.msg41464924#msg41464924
https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/11/09/craig-wright-threatens-to-crash-bchs-price-to-zero-in-an-email-to-roger-ver

Craig Wright has not demonstrated that he has the private keys to Satoshis wallets.
https://medium.com/@hoaxchain/the-hard-evidence-about-craig-wrights-backdated-pgp-key-step-by-step-guide-for-windows-users-bd99c47c495f
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11609707

Craig Wright is alleged to have deceived the Australian Authorities for $54 million.
https://bitsonline.com/wright-supercomputing-liquidated/

Craig Wright is subject to a $10 billion lawsuit.
https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-served-with-summons-for-10-billion-lawsuit-brought-by-dave-kleimans-estate/

In my opinion - the bitcoin addresses he used (that he didn't own) to claim the tax credits in Australia - that story is now resulting in him being sued by the dead guys brother that he used as the fall guy.

I believe that he:

1) doesn't own the wallets he claims to own.
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html

2) fraudulently claimed the tax credits.

Cloudcroft and DeMorgan were mired in Wright’s battles with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). The group companies had allegedly claimed tax rebates of around $54 million AUD ($41m USD) for research and development. The ATO fraud squad launched a probe into the rebates in January 2016, a month after raiding Wright’s Sydney home and office.

3) now is subject to the $10  billion lawsuit due to the stories he created.
https://hackernoon.com/has-craig-wright-committed-perjury-new-information-in-the-kleiman-case-cbaaf2628e93

4) wants to take or "donate" the wallets that he doesn't own.
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/fixing-op-fals-fd157899d2b7

Returning “lost” money into circulation is a future means of miner revenue and analogous to salvage firms who seek lost bullion on ships that have sunk in the sea. - Craig Wright.

[mk4]

If Craig S. Wright is indeed the real Satoshi Nakamoto, he could simply sign a message using one of the addresses affiliated with Satoshi, or probably just simply send one single satoshi somewhere. The fact that he couldn't do that for proof is enough evidence for him to not be Satoshi.