Stake allocation

[swivel1983@gmail.com]

I think that everything is fair, although the high rank on the forum does not make posts more valuable, now we are at least sure that users with high rank for many years know about cryptocurrencies and have experience of their use. Most newcomers came just to earn coins quickly and immediately sell them for a song, they do not help the community to develop and deservedly receive a low reward.

[crypt0.r3negades]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

You are right. Because the higher ranks has the chance to advertise the project most compared to jr. members which was in the lowest rank. I think it was just fair to do that.

[fortunecrypto]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

It's one of the privileges of being high-rank members you get to show a prominent signature new members should show that they deserve to be here by contributing to this forum, all forums have these ranking members system, this is to differentiate people who are long-time users and what they've accomplished as a member of a forum.

[Deallove9]

When talking about signature campaign then the likes of full member to senior member owns it as the junior is just a little coin to get which is even more hard to get these days by posting quality post bitany are not even bother about that any more but only consign about their reward in social media and the rest .

[Genkotsu]

this is signature bounty campain right ? you mean why jr. memeber and sr. member is different.
yeah we know this and why it is have a far different becuase sr. member have a good potential to make a better post and good quality new thread.
just my speculation but i think that the main reason why the different is so far.

[ZEIIMAN]

All newcomers to the forum who wish to earn more money at the expense of bounty. Always blaming the new rules. But many have heard about the crypto currency for a long time, only they came to the forum when a huge growth began.

[ned.ryerson]

All newcomers to the forum who wish to earn more money at the expense of bounty. Always blaming the new rules. But many have heard about the crypto currency for a long time, only they came to the forum when a huge growth began.

many even then did not understand then what the forum can give to them. they did not make quality content in order to earn a high rank on the forum

[sorrros]

Higher stake allocation is for member that are more respected in the community. People are reading all posts from Legendaries or Heroes, but mainly they do not care what uniors are writing   .

[oseikuf44]

I don't think the stake allocation is based on article quality but rather the visibility of the banner display by the member. A junior member signature is very hard to be visible seen but a senior member signature can display and provide more info for a project.

[fosco333]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I think it is fair. They got more allocation because the signature on higher member rank is better than lower rank.
About their posts, they just need to create a post that meet the requirements of the signature campaign such as : good post, no spamming, no less than 100 characters, no less than 15 posts / week, etc.

[Stanlo]

Since you aren't on here when merits are been giving out based on quantity of posts on make just get used to today's idea and you can't blame the forum for that because the new merit order fix spammers marginally ,this doesn't mean you still can't get merits again just start contributing and help newbies solve one or more problems on here and who know? You might actually get merits

And about bounty allocation I think its perfect just the way it is, sr member and legendary members deserve the best payouts than Jr members ,they contributed the most that's why they got that ranks so don't stop contributing on this forum to rank up

[Samboo]

If you feel sad and unjustified about the way merits are being distributed to bitcoin forum members. You can make posts that can generate merits.
If you find difficult to get merits from altcoin discussion, you can go to other sections of the forum where you may get your posts being paid much attentions by others, and you can get merits.