STOs are really the future of ICOs?

[Novatech8]

I know STO is secured and better than ICO but the way things are going now IEO will beat STO to dust ,yes it looks like that's what will happen this year,many projects will prefer IEO crowdfunding

[Quintrix]

Hello, I would like to ask you about STOs. It means that STO is regulated and has a license to run a token sale, am I correct? And all STOs are giving passive income to token holders or not?
I have heard about these two big STOs BoltonCoin and FABA and both STOs are suspected as a scam, have you heard about that?
And my last question how something that is regulated could be a scam..? 

Thanks!

I don't believe in this two crowdfunding because of the scam rumors, investors prefer to invest in IEO, it's safe, profitable and crowdfunding can be finished within minutes as compared to ICO and STO, no wonder it's a hot topic today.

[shesheboy]

to be honest , this was my first time to heard of it . is this the same as lpo's and ipo's  ?   in the meantime ieo's are the one that everyone is talking about  . they say ieo's is the future of ico's because ieo's are said to be legit due to the fact that they are backed by famous and reputable exchange sites  .  for now maybe but we dont know in the future   .  i remeber last time when the first ico came out , they are also legit but eventually the ico scene got polluted by greedy sccammers   . lets hope the same thing wont happen to ieo's and sto's  

[george_hured]

Perhaps this is true because relying on today's conclusions on how quickly IEO passes, it can be concluded that it is very convenient and fast. But we do not know how much it costs and who the real owner is, maybe, the exchanges themselves create these projects?

[Robotbitcoin22]

IEO atuapaun STO is a new thing at this time and in my opinion it will indeed be a new thing, regarding the development later we cannot speculate too far because indeed it is a difficult thing

[zgrdyg]

I did think the same but right now, it seems IEO is more popular and succesfull than STO's. ICO's are over yes but right now the replacement seems to be IEO's.

[temilade200]

When you are the word STO on a project, it does not outrightly mean it is legit. It still calls that you should make proper findings before investing. It is true that STOs are meant to be regulated, but scammers can also proclaim a project to be regulated and the only way you can detect them is by doing research to know where they are actually registered, ask for document backing them up and trace the claim back to the regulatory body or  bodies.

[beerlover]

Hello, I would like to ask you about STOs. It means that STO is regulated and has a license to run a token sale, am I correct? And all STOs are giving passive income to token holders or not?
I have heard about these two big STOs BoltonCoin and FABA and both STOs are suspected as a scam, have you heard about that?
And my last question how something that is regulated could be a scam..? 

Thanks!

They are suspected scam, if they are indeed an STO, they will not stand with the regulators, because they are being monitored, we'll see the progress of that two coins I stopped following them but it sure is a bad start for STO, looks like IEO is the next big thing.

We can’t really conclude that they are STO based projects, if they are finding it difficult to infiltrate IEO, why would they infiltrate something that is being regulated which SEC can go after at any time, I think when it comes to investment security, STO will still be leading because they have more than what it takes to go after a scammer.

I am not saying scammers cannot take advantage of STO, you know we have some people that are so daft that they would try anything believing they will not get caught, so am sure it won’t be long for people being those 2 coins to be caught if they are really scammers that came through STO.

[Akoldi_ibk]

Hello, I would like to ask you about STOs. It means that STO is regulated and has a license to run a token sale, am I correct? And all STOs are giving passive income to token holders or not?
I have heard about these two big STOs BoltonCoin and FABA and both STOs are suspected as a scam, have you heard about that?
And my last question how something that is regulated could be a scam..?  

Thanks!

You asked that how something that is regulated could be a scam. Well, what if the project wasn't actually registered under any authority and just decided to fabricate the whole thing. Scammers are busy working on process to counter and boycott all kinds of procedures to stop their activities. One should be careful and wise even with the so-called STOs. And people tend to dig less into STO projects believing they are regulated and can't scam.

[elitemobb]

I think that the service station is much safer than ICO because the first one is the safest for investors. Yes, I understand that there are a couple of fraudulent projects, but understand that sales of this kind need a regulator that will protect investors' funds.

[ePesoInitiative]

Yeah, it is. At least when they plan to fund raise through security token offering, it may offer protections to the investors since security tokens should act like stocks where holders get a percentage of the profit.

[CryptoGosu]

I do not think that STO is the future of ICO. I think that IEO is the future of ICO. STO have low popularity yet. I’m not sure that they will be able to meet expectations.