Hey guys - this post was brought to my attention.
I’m on mobile outside atm so any changes will have to be later tonight.
Just let me know which people are causing the issue and I’ll adjust accordingly - those guys were trusted many years ago most likely from sales done on the forum - before I was on any DT levels.
All good though and happy to help clear anything up. Just post and let me know.
Thanks!
Thanks for stopping by -- there's no issue really -- I just wanted to promote discourse on trust system-related issues. I don't want to tell people how to run their trusts lists. The people you've included that I mentioned aren't causing any trouble and I see you added them ages ago. If they were added today I would find them to be un-DT-worthy, personally speaking, but the situation is understandable... I will probably exclude 3 of them, fair warning. Hopefully I've made it clear enough why.
what's the protocol for having users on your trust list who have left significant trust but have since left the forum in one way or another? I have a few in my list but I can't bare myself to remove them (not as big of an issue perhaps since I'm not DT1).
That question occurred to me the other day, about whether inactive members should be DT, and I'd say its ok if their ratings are still accurate.
I like to keep my # inclusions around 50 and rotate people out who have been inactive for a while. I removed ICOEthics after about a year of inactivity and removed TMAN recently.
Not saying other people should do this -- I think relying on the ratings of inactive users is for the most part fine. Sometimes things will change though and their feedback will no longer be accurate... In that case, it might be worth looking at their ratings as a whole to see if they are still worth including.