The vaccination issue is not bipolar

[_Miracle]

Re: The vaccination issue is not bipolar

You may notice that my suggestions are directly opposed to government guidelines,  and, on reflection, you may realise that the government doesn't want you to be healthy and recover from the disease quickly. It is in their interest to keep you dependent on their synthetic health system, and to carry on the associated wealth transfer that distracts you from the other changes that are being introduced.

Being in direct opposition to something makes your stance bipolar.
Making blanket statements about "the government's" intention regarding our health makes your view myopic when considering it's a global pandemic and btw you have a lot more faith in the ability of politicians to produce intentional outcomes than I do---which does put us at opposite poles on that issue.

The number of variants that arise is proportional to the amount of the virus in circulation. Vaccination reduces the number of variants.

I'm not sure where you get this information, but lets look at the way I came to my uneducated conclusion.
-
I'm an ex mainframe systems programmer, so I tend to have an enquiring mind, and I like to get to the root of things.

Even well-reasoned lines of enquiry require base data to come to an understanding of a subject, if you are only willing to consider information outside of the mainstream, your data set is incomplete.
It’s easier to find and relate to information that confirms your bias.
For a Pro-Vax perspective try…

*cut and pasted from Wikipedia
Paul Allan Offit (born 27 March 1951) is an American pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases, vaccines, immunology, and virology. He is the co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine. Offit is the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology, professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, former chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases (1992–2014), and the director of the Vaccine Education Center at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. He has been a member of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(anywhere besides the main news outlets)
https://www.c-span.org/video/?514731-5/washington-journal-dr-paul-offit-discusses-boosters-vaccines-children    ----boring

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3wJZ9zh5a8    ----Zdogg has better questions funnier, and speaks on Vaers reporting towards the end



You don't seem to mind posting polarizing concepts regarding vaccines
Are unvaccinated people purebloods?   --   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365968.0

[tvbcof]

...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3wJZ9zh5a8    ----Zdogg has better questions funnier, and speaks on Vaers reporting towards the end

Skimmed it.  Pretty cringy/creepy.  The one funny thing that Z said was that in his _next_ career he wants to be a propagandist.

You don't seem to mind posting polarizing concepts regarding vaccines
Are unvaccinated people purebloods?   --   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365968.0

I don't want to be a GMO programmed by Jeff Epstein's pals and comrades.  And I certainly do not when ownership of a GMO is assigned to the intellectual property rights holder of the genetic modifications.

That's the way the laws could be interpreted now, particularly after massive lobbying money pumped by biotech over the last few decades.  How, exactly, such claims might be adjudicated in the future depends a bunch on who does the adjudication I suspect.  If it is a group who subscribes to the notion that the only reason that God put most humans on earth was to serve a different group as their slaves (e.g., the Kushner's Chabad-Lubavitch cult with their 'Noahide Laws'), then it's fairly easy to guess on which way things would go.

[BADecker]

Lol Masks work, eh? Document this https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.

Then document the dozens of of videos here https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ that show what's really going on with masks.

And if you want to see the danger of masks... https://www.bitchute.com/video/ypLjmXQoLygi/.

WOW you really know good scientific sources! Nature? naaaah! "bitchute"    

ROFL

When it's this obvious, it serves as scientific source material. Use your head. How does a scientist determine something? He observes it one way or another.

[Jet Cash]

Covid vaccines are the first particulate vaccines, and the effects of injecting nano-particles are untested in humans, but are carcinogenic in rats. The issue od injecting micro-devices to report on our activities is a planned red herring. Why would they need to do that when they can inject payment processing chips with the consent of the victim? DNA altering nano-particles have been under development for several years, and the research is documented on the net. That is the real risk in these vaccines.

[_Miracle]

Covid vaccines are the first particulate vaccines, and the effects of injecting nano-particles are untested in humans, but are carcinogenic in rats. The issue od injecting micro-devices to report on our activities is a planned red herring. Why would they need to do that when they can inject payment processing chips with the consent of the victim? DNA altering nano-particles have been under development for several years, and the research is documented on the net. That is the real risk in these vaccines.

Jet Cash,
it seems like you come from a place of compassion to tell people to live a healthier more natural lifestyle, you seem like a genuinely decent human being but
that's a lot you just said there. There is also plenty of research available on JSTOR as well but you would have to pay for it---while "research on the net" is free; you're getting what you pay for.

I would not like to be unkind to you so this wouldn't be a topic we could engage on; it's polarized enough in real discussion.