Why do these accounts have the right to wear a clickable signature on the forum?

[Lucius]

Of course, there are always solutions, but the question is whether the administration of the forum considers it a problem, and consequently does it have the slightest intention to do something about it? I have only listed two possible solutions that would automatically disable such members from having signatures no matter how much I find it impossible for that to happen.

I have been on the forum since 2015 and believe me I have witnessed a dozen similar threads discussing how to prevent bad people from doing bad things on the forum - the only thing that has happened in 7 years is the merit system which has in some ways made it difficult for future spammers to thrive, but it did not solve the problem of old spammers who retained the benefits of the pre-merit system.

It is not technically difficult to remove signatures from individual profiles because even global mods can do this, which we have seen in the case of plagiarism penalties. The question is who and on the basis of which criteria will make an assessment that someone will be punished in this way, will the removal of the signature be permanent or temporary...?

[Pmalek]

In addition, if things get out of hand - an option that is already on the table is a complete ban on signature campaigns.

If theymos wants a 70-80% decrease in forum activity, banning signatures and removing the altcoin boards altogether is a great way to achieve that. But I doubt that is something that is being considered.

That's not the point Lucius. Or at least not the point I am trying to make.

My point is that those morons shouldn't have the right to wear a clickable signature just because they registered on a certain date, and I think that on that we agree.

But the admins obviously don't care about who wears what signature or if they wear one at all. Generally speaking, the interest of the forum is not to restrict people from doing anything. Do what you want but you have to be willing to face the consequences. 

[Poker Player]

Of course, there are always solutions, but the question is whether the administration of the forum considers it a problem, and consequently does it have the slightest intention to do something about it?

Well, I commented earlier in the thread that I don't think theymos will do anything because you can see that he likes to think things through very well and from what you comment.

But I have the right to expose the problem and open a debate.

Do what you want but you have to be willing to face the consequences.  

What consequences do they face?

A legendary member in the 1xCrap campaign with 0 merit earned, a person who would not be able to wear a signature if he had registered in the forum post-merit system earns at the level of the second highest paid campaigns of the forum, $100 per week. The only thing he gets is a red tag that does not prevent him from receiving a good salary if he lives in a third world country and a good extra income if he lives in a first world country, for writing garbage.

[Pmalek]

What consequences do they face?

Sooner or later, that 1x campaign will end and the casino might get tired of throwing money on people who aren't capable of reading and writing properly. The consequence is that no other reputable project, campaign manager, or forum member will want to do business with them anymore. Of all the streets in the city, they can only walk on one while you can walk on all of them.

[LoyceV]

If theymos wants a 70-80% decrease in forum activity

That happened already, after the introduction of Merit restrictions for Newbies. We're now at 48,000 posts per week, that used to be 280,000 posts per week. It dropped by more than 80%! The crypto bear market might have had something to do with that too, but even in last year's bull market the maximum I've seen was still less than 80,000 posts per week (if I remember correctly, I didn't check this data too often).