Guys you are not understanding what I mean to say.
Forget about screenshot & it's wallet address. I'll come to it later.
Let's clear this point:
Explanation from unknown source:
1) Ethereum:
Ethereum wallet addresses are represented in hexadecimal base16. A Ethereum wallet address is a 40-character string that starts with "0x" followed by a combination of letters A-F and numbers 0-9.
2) Bitcoin:
Bitcoin wallet addresses are typically represented using the Base16 encoding, also known as hexadecimal (hex) encoding. Hexadecimal is a numbering system that uses 16 symbols: 0-9 and A-F.
A Bitcoin wallet address is a string of alphanumeric characters, consisting of letters A-F and numbers 0-9.
Above explanations at 1 & 2, says that both Bitcoin & Ethereum wallet address consist of alphanumeric characters, consisting of letters A-F and numbers 0-9.
So, as per the above explanations at 1 & 2, Bitcoin & even Ethereum wallet address having only numerical characters must not exist at blockchain.
Consider below as Ethereum wallet address. It start with prefix 0x and has 40 numerical characters.
0x1234567891011121314151617181920212223242
Now check this
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/search?search=0x1234567891011121314151617181920212223242You will find a wallet address with zero balance.
Now let's take Bitcoin.
Consider below as Bitcoin wallet address. It start with prefix 1 and has 34 numerical characters.
1234567891011121314151617181920212
Now check this.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/search?search=1234567891011121314151617181920212You will not find any result. (The reason is because the searched wallet address is made of only numerical characters. And as per me this result is correct).
So my question is why this difference?
If both crypto has same statement explanations at 1 & 2. Then why there is a different output?
Is this a mistake of the site? If it is so, then why I find same different output at all other sites. Is this happens by accident?