Parents who send their kids to public schools are child abusers.

[BADecker]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

So are you saying that parents who don't have enough money to feed their kids are not neglecting their children either? By going to public schools, people cannot even understand that BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE! The public school system is fucked up, and all the fuckers who attend these institutions are fucked up too because public schools are violent. You see nothing wrong with public schools because you love the violence that happens there.

I don't even know why you are talking about Bitcoin and cryptographic algorithms when it is obvious that neither in middle schools or highschools cryptography is not part of the pensum for those children and teens to learn to begin with, if anything, people start to learn about the fundamental of cryptography in universities. It does not matter whether the highschool people decide to send their children to (public or private) they won't learn anything about the mechanisms which make Blockchains to function, and they won't learn about "reversible cryptography".

Actually, I am not even sure reversible cryptography could function outside the theory, would not it be a violation against the second law of thermodynamics of some Blockchain and mining equipment worked under a process which is supposed to be reversible in the real world? It would imply there would not be loss of energy during the whole functioning time of such imaginary Blockchain. Wouldn't it?

The answer to your ideas is found here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548867.0

[jvanname]

I don't even know why you are talking about Bitcoin and cryptographic algorithms when it is obvious that neither in middle schools or highschools cryptography is not part of the pensum for those children and teens to learn to begin with, if anything, people start to learn about the fundamental of cryptography in universities. It does not matter whether the highschool people decide to send their children to (public or private) they won't learn anything about the mechanisms which make Blockchains to function, and they won't learn about "reversible cryptography".

Actually, I am not even sure reversible cryptography could function outside the theory, would not it be a violation against the second law of thermodynamics of some Blockchain and mining equipment worked under a process which is supposed to be reversible in the real world? It would imply there would not be loss of energy during the whole functioning time of such imaginary Blockchain. Wouldn't it?

Um. Most of the motherfuckers who go to universities do not study cryptography either. Most of them are stupid ass dipshits because universities are more interested in promoting violence than actually doing their fucking jobs and teaching people stuff. But you seem to be really fucking confused about everything because you suffer from an intellectual disability. Or maybe you are enjoying it like the tard who smiles all the time because he has no clue how anything works and no idea what is going on at all. Not only do highschoolers lack the intelligence and skills to sit down and read the Bitcoin whitepaper, but college graduates also lack this discipline too. High schools are too fucking busy promoting violence to teach the kids skills they need so that they will be able to read the Bitcoin whitepaper.

If you want to talk about reversible cryptography, you need to quit being a fucking anti-intellectual dumbass. You have no clue about anything because you are a moron! And this is not the thread to talk about reversible cryptography. To make another thread or go lookup an old thread to talk about that. And when you do that, you need to stop acting like the students in my class who scream in class and make violent threats against the professor because I CANNOT FUCKING COMMUNICATE FACTS TO YOU WHEN YOU ARE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY CONSUMED BY YOUR OWN HATRED AND IDIOCY!

The answer to your ideas is found here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548867.0

You are wrong too because you are also a dipshit.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[BADecker]

I don't even know why you are talking about Bitcoin and cryptographic algorithms when it is obvious that neither in middle schools or highschools cryptography is not part of the pensum for those children and teens to learn to begin with, if anything, people start to learn about the fundamental of cryptography in universities. It does not matter whether the highschool people decide to send their children to (public or private) they won't learn anything about the mechanisms which make Blockchains to function, and they won't learn about "reversible cryptography".

Actually, I am not even sure reversible cryptography could function outside the theory, would not it be a violation against the second law of thermodynamics of some Blockchain and mining equipment worked under a process which is supposed to be reversible in the real world? It would imply there would not be loss of energy during the whole functioning time of such imaginary Blockchain. Wouldn't it?

Um. Most of the motherfuckers who go to universities do not study cryptography either. Most of them are stupid ass dipshits because universities are more interested in promoting violence than actually doing their fucking jobs and teaching people stuff. But you seem to be really fucking confused about everything because you suffer from an intellectual disability. Or maybe you are enjoying it like the tard who smiles all the time because he has no clue how anything works and no idea what is going on at all. Not only do highschoolers lack the intelligence and skills to sit down and read the Bitcoin whitepaper, but college graduates also lack this discipline too. High schools are too fucking busy promoting violence to teach the kids skills they need so that they will be able to read the Bitcoin whitepaper.

If you want to talk about reversible cryptography, you need to quit being a fucking anti-intellectual dumbass. You have no clue about anything because you are a moron! And this is not the thread to talk about reversible cryptography. To make another thread or go lookup an old thread to talk about that. And when you do that, you need to stop acting like the students in my class who scream in class and make violent threats against the professor because I CANNOT FUCKING COMMUNICATE FACTS TO YOU WHEN YOU ARE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY CONSUMED BY YOUR OWN HATRED AND IDIOCY!

The answer to your ideas is found here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548867.0

You are wrong too because you are also a dipshit.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

So, you think that I am a dipshit like you know you are. You pretty smart guy. Recognizing your own failures like that are one of the best ways to start learning reality. It will help you figure out which school to go to now that you can't be accepted at universities an longer. Try second grade elementary school. Make it home schooling. Your mommy can teach you.

[AYOBA]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Because the parents were wealthier than one another, I don't see anything wrong with some of them sending their children to public schools. Since when is there no private school? Our parents also attended a public school, and they were doing well because they got what they wanted. So, in this case, sending their children to public school does not constitute child abuse.  Taking a child out of a private school is a matter of choice because whatever they can learn in a private school can also be learned in public schools, therefore there is nothing wrong with that.

[jvanname]

So, you think that I am a dipshit like you know you are. You pretty smart guy. Recognizing your own failures like that are one of the best ways to start learning reality. It will help you figure out which school to go to now that you can't be accepted at universities an longer. Try second grade elementary school. Make it home schooling. Your mommy can teach you.

This is exactly what a dipshit would say. You are mentally ill.

Because the parents were wealthier than one another, I don't see anything wrong with some of them sending their children to public schools. Since when is there no private school? Our parents also attended a public school, and they were doing well because they got what they wanted. So, in this case, sending their children to public school does not constitute child abuse.  Taking a child out of a private school is a matter of choice because whatever they can learn in a private school can also be learned in public schools, therefore there is nothing wrong with that.

Public schools are violent, so the education that people receive at a public school has very little value. And since universities promote violence, the education that people receive at universities is substandard garbage as well. People with degrees from universities are fucked up braindead shitheads.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Samlucky O]

Don't be surprised that most of the Best student in the world graduated from public schools. We can not deny the fact that some public schools are horrible, but even as that some are still cool and decent, we cannot generalize all school to be thesame where as not so. People send their children to schools base on their financial capacity. No parents is happy sending their children to public schools but all hands are not equal. Do you want to say that everyone should avoid sending their children to public schools even when they can't afford private school? Just as people go for what they can afford in the market so it is also to education. When you have money you send your children to the Best school in the world, but when there is no much money then the best you can do is to send them to an affordable one including public schools.

[Apocollapse]

What about this "parents who give birth when they're not rich are criminals"?

There's a new trend in my country if only the rich are allowed to give birth, if middle or lower class want to give a birth, then they have a financial problem, people will blame the parents first.

The society are expecting the parents must provide everything in high quality for their kids.

Example like this thread, people are expect parents to send their kids to private schools. People are expect the baby to drink the expensive infant formula, afford to enter English tutor, art tutor, etc.

[jvanname]

Don't be surprised that most of the Best student in the world graduated from public schools. We can not deny the fact that some public schools are horrible, but even as that some are still cool and decent, we cannot generalize all school to be thesame where as not so. People send their children to schools base on their financial capacity. No parents is happy sending their children to public schools but all hands are not equal. Do you want to say that everyone should avoid sending their children to public schools even when they can't afford private school? Just as people go for what they can afford in the market so it is also to education. When you have money you send your children to the Best school in the world, but when there is no much money then the best you can do is to send them to an affordable one including public schools.

Since public schools are violent, I do not care if the people who cannot afford private schools have to send their stupid ass kids to public schools. Public school graduates are still graduates from violent institutions and they have earned my disrespect.

What about this "parents who give birth when they're not rich are criminals"?

There's a new trend in my country if only the rich are allowed to give birth, if middle or lower class want to give a birth, then they have a financial problem, people will blame the parents first.

The society are expecting the parents must provide everything in high quality for their kids.

Example like this thread, people are expect parents to send their kids to private schools. People are expect the baby to drink the expensive infant formula, afford to enter English tutor, art tutor, etc.

The highest quality education is self-learning. Kids don't need to go to some snobby ass private school when they can stay home and read the books for free. So no, parents don't need disgusting baby formula since they can breastfeed. Parents don't necessarily need to give their kids tutors. And if they do, the tutors are there to steer the kids in the right direction, clear up misconceptions, and make sure the kids are learning the material. It is the kid's job to learn the stuff. The tutor is a luxury and extra help rather than a necessity.



Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Rockson1]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Are you serious right now, even though I understand what you meant, have you also consider those parents income, I know that you'll say that it is the obligation of parent to make sure their children attend good schools but don't you think this public schools rehabilitation should be a sole responsibility of the government to revamp, if this public school schools are in good condition with good teachers and good modern practical equipments, don't you think no one will be spending much to send their children to private schools where they will be paying heavily, all hands will never be equal in terms of parents providing for their children so excuse must be their, though you're right but you've to consider something then you will understand that if those parents have their way, they'll not take their to such schools.

[jvanname]

Are you serious right now, even though I understand what you meant, have you also consider those parents income, I know that you'll say that it is the obligation of parent to make sure their children attend good schools but don't you think this public schools rehabilitation should be a sole responsibility of the government to revamp, if this public school schools are in good condition with good teachers and good modern practical equipments, don't you think no one will be spending much to send their children to private schools where they will be paying heavily, all hands will never be equal in terms of parents providing for their children so excuse must be their, though you're right but you've to consider something then you will understand that if those parents have their way, they'll not take their to such schools.

I am fucking serious, you bitch ass bitch. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE FOR THIS MADNESS! And what about parent's income? I DON'T FUCKING CARE! THEY ARE CHILD ABUSERS REGARDLESS OF ANYTHING! BECAUSE IT TAKES VERY VERY LITTLE TO TELL A KIDS TO STAY AT HOME AND READ A FUCKING BOOK!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Agbamoni]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

I myself hate public school. It will be a shame to see my kids go to a public school because of lack of finance, that is why I make sure I make the money they need to have a good life.

Many things happen in public schools, peer group influence, cultism, gay shits, drug abuse etc. Of course they happen in private schools too but they are very rare there. The most annoying thing is that public schools has poor educational system.

[knowngunman]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

With all due respect, this topic belongs to trash bin. I'm confident that you're a product of public school and majority of the proprietors/proprietress operating the private schools are also product of public schools. I don't want to know which aspects you're judging from either the learning aspects, the environmental aspect or the discipline aspect but it is harsh and senseless to tagged parents as child abusers for enrolling their children in public schools. Private schools are just organisations that extort money from parents and enslaved their staff with peanut take home pay.

[Achalugo BTC]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

True, there some states in United States that do face some challenges in sending their children, they even find it hard to feed their children, talk more of sending their children to school.

But, if they tried and send them to school, it will be a public school, because that's the only one they can afford but there are many productive citizens, that attends public.

So, whether public or private, what matters is learning to improve their life in the future, especially if they knew the reason why they were sent to school.

[kingstep]

If not for the lack of maintenance culture and the lack of proper investment into the public sector, would it have degenerated to the point where schooling in a public school that's built by tax payers money becomes a disadvantage?

People's financial status differs and with how expensive private schools are, not all parents can afford to spend such amount of money for Thier kids to get such education when they can pay a lesser amount for a public school that offers same service and use what's almost like the same curriculum. Would you rather have a parent spend all his earning on a child's school fees and find it deficult to take care of the families needs when public schools that are cheap can be a good options combined with other things like paying for the child's private lesson fee and purchasing of good text book for the kids?

Most private schools are just sophisticated centres that lacks a lot of real learning aids compared to what an intentional parent can bring out of a child that's attending a public school and still has access to good text books and private lesson teacher that will also be of great help to the child.

[Zlantann]

What about this "parents who give birth when they're not rich are criminals"?

There's a new trend in my country if only the rich are allowed to give birth, if middle or lower class want to give a birth, then they have a financial problem, people will blame the parents first.

The society are expecting the parents must provide everything in high quality for their kids.

Example like this thread, people are expect parents to send their kids to private schools. People are expect the baby to drink the expensive infant formula, afford to enter English tutor, art tutor, etc.

We have some parents in my neighbourhood who are in deep financial shit because they want their children to attend the best school in town. These expensive school owners entice them using advertisements that show children speaking impeccable Queens English. Expensive schools don't determine how well a child will learn. And speaking good English is not the hallmark of learning.  One will begin to wonder how Chinese and Indians in my country are making so much money even when some of them can't express themselves in English.

 I read a discussion on a social media platform between Elon Musk and Pavel Durov. And they said the best subjects children should learn to become successful in this technological-driven world are Mathematics and Physics. And that's my focus for my children. Science,  technology,  engineering,  mathematics, and sport are the areas my children would focus on.

[o48o]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are f*king violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life.
-cut-

Please give an alternative, because without that it's all it's just a vague tantrum. "Violence" against whom? Thats vague and hardly an argument, because apart from school shootings i have heard no such claims from anyone else.

Compared to any institution that has group of similar aged kids, i don't believe there's any difference when it comes to level violence or bullying.

If you give homeschool as an alternative, you think that most parents would have skills or time to teach their kids?

[jvanname]

With all due respect, this topic belongs to trash bin. I'm confident that you're a product of public school and majority of the proprietors/proprietress operating the private schools are also product of public schools. I don't want to know which aspects you're judging from either the learning aspects, the environmental aspect or the discipline aspect but it is harsh and senseless to tagged parents as child abusers for enrolling their children in public schools. Private schools are just organisations that extort money from parents and enslaved their staff with peanut take home pay.

Public schools are evil violent places. You are gaslighting me for standing against violence because you are pure evil.

Please give an alternative, because without that it's all it's just a vague tantrum. "Violence" against whom? Thats vague and hardly an argument, because apart from school shootings i have heard no such claims from anyone else.

Compared to any institution that has group of similar aged kids, i don't believe there's any difference when it comes to level violence or bullying.

If you give homeschool as an alternative, you think that most parents would have skills or time to teach their kids?

Violence is not an argument? You are incredibly delusional and evil too. But parents who do not have the time or the skills to teach their kids are simply bad parents.

We have some parents in my neighbourhood who are in deep financial shit because they want their children to attend the best school in town. These expensive school owners entice them using advertisements that show children speaking impeccable Queens English. Expensive schools don't determine how well a child will learn. And speaking good English is not the hallmark of learning.  One will begin to wonder how Chinese and Indians in my country are making so much money even when some of them can't express themselves in English.

 I read a discussion on a social media platform between Elon Musk and Pavel Durov. And they said the best subjects children should learn to become successful in this technological-driven world are Mathematics and Physics. And that's my focus for my children. Science,  technology,  engineering,  mathematics, and sport are the areas my children would focus on.

Oh. You are one of them Musk worshippers. But you are too dumb to realize that BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Solodoski]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

I don't think I totally agree with you on this one. Yes its good to give your children the best of everything including education,  but if a parent can't afford the fees for a private school, I think that parent has no choice than to send his children to a public school and I don't think that makes them a bad parent or child abuser. I am very sure that if you ask any of these parents, they will tell you they want their kids to be in a private school,  but they don't have the means, so they have to make do with what they can afford.