Parents who send their kids to public schools are child abusers.

[jvanname]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Hispo]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

[jvanname]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

So are you saying that parents who don't have enough money to feed their kids are not neglecting their children either? By going to public schools, people cannot even understand that BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE! The public school system is fucked up, and all the fuckers who attend these institutions are fucked up too because public schools are violent. You see nothing wrong with public schools because you love the violence that happens there.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

P.S. YOU NEED TO PUT ON MIND NUMBING PSYCHIATRIC MEDICATIONS BECAUSE YOU ARE SO FUCKED UP THAT YOU CANNOT REALIZE HOW PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE BAD. YES. PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS JUST LIKE THE PARENTS WHO SEND THEM THERE! THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Hmm. Maybe if fewer people went to f@#$ing public schools, they would not worship Elon Musk more than Jesus Christ. But you are too mentally ill to know that this is a problem.

AND YOU ALSO THINK THAT UNIVERSITIES PROVIDE A LEGITIMATE EDUCATION WHEN THEY REFUSE TO APOLOGIZE FOR PROMOTING VIOLENCE!

[BitBakerr1]

It all depends, in some countries there public schools are so standard and well equipped and there teachers there teach very well, if someone is in a country like this and he decides to send there children to public schools I don't see how that is abusing there children, and again in those countries where there public schools are not well equipped and standard and parent are sending there children there it may be that they are facing financial set back and they decided to withdraw there children from private school and send them to public schools because it's more cheaper you can't call them abusers too, because they won't steal to send there children to private school.
The parent that should be call abuser for sending there children to public schools are those parents that stay in a country where there public schools are nothing to right home about and they have the financial strength to take there children to private school but decide to take them to public schools or those parent that are not even struggling to give there children the best education, this are parent will can call child Abusers.

[Ishicryptic]

I will give you a practical example, I attended public schools throughout my schooling age and I can say that I ended up a responsible adult including many of my friends that also attended public schools. There is a saying where I come from that some people pass through school while school pass through some people, it means that some people went to school just to answer that they were students once while some actually got educated in schools. OP is perhaps implying that parents who cannot afford to send their children to private schools should not let them to attend public schools, I think that is a very myopic mindset. Training of children starts from the homes, children that are well trained at home will not misbehave in school whether it is public or private.

[MArsland]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Huh, no reason? So we can't argue with you?

Shouldn't we discuss the ins and outs of why sending a child to a public school is considered violence?
We really need an explanation of the conditions there, the status of the curriculum, education policies, and the role of teachers within them. Without any background on the issues you mentioned, we're at a standstill.

Furthermore even if there are acts of violence in public schools, it doesn't necessarily represent all of them, right? It could be caused by naughty children, indiscipline, defiance, and violations of school rules.
So what solution do you offer to address this? Are there better options for educating a child so they receive a proper education?

Wow you have a Ph.D? surely you're better than those of us without degrees, right?
Hey, Joseph Van Name, Ph.D, if public schools are violent, does that mean your Ph.D. is a product of that violence?

[Dunamisx]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life.

Maybe you need to look at our current leaders today and see how they have all been doing well, also take a look at the society and see how we are blessed with diverse numbers of talented professionals in their various specializations, could you believe that almost 90% of them are government schools attendees and ha e passed through the same path to become whom they were today, i will only suggest my opinion that the leaders should create more budgets for the soft runnings of the educational sectors.

[BADecker]

Home schooling.     

[Juse14]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.

However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.

And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.

[Fiatless]

Public schools are absolutely horrendous evil environments for kids. Public schools are fucking violent. Parents that send their kids to public schools need to reconsider their bad decisions in life. THERE IS NO FUCKING EXCUSE!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

Public schools are cheaper. In my country, you would have to be rich to send your children to any good private school. Except you want to arrange for homeschooling, which might require either the wife or husband to stop working. Public schools might not be the best, but that's the only option some poor or moderate families have. But the parents have the responsibility of monitoring the topics or curriculum the children are exposed to. They need to redirect these children if the schools are deviating from acceptable beliefs or ideologies.

[jvanname]

I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.

However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.

And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.

Homes are uncomfortable places for most people since most families are fucked up. I don't care why children are misbehaving. When they are violent, we must consider all public schools as being completely and permanently discredited. When public school students are violent, we must all consider public school graduates as stupid ass morons.

Public schools are cheaper. In my country, you would have to be rich to send your children to any good private school. Except you want to arrange for homeschooling, which might require either the wife or husband to stop working. Public schools might not be the best, but that's the only option some poor or moderate families have. But the parents have the responsibility of monitoring the topics or curriculum the children are exposed to. They need to redirect these children if the schools are deviating from acceptable beliefs or ideologies.

Whatever happened to having children with enough discipline to sit down and read a fucking book? BOOKS ARE NOT THAT EXPENSIVE! IF A STUDENT READS BOOKS FOR A COUPLE HOURS A DAY, THAT STUDENT WILL GET A FAR BETTER EDUCATION BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH FREAKS AND IDIOTS RUINING THE EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE!

But if we have to consider the children of parents who are not rich enough to afford a fucking education as stupid ass morons, then so be it. I am not here to play fair when PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE FUCKING VIOLENT HELLHOLES!

Home schooling.      

Amen. Kids need to learn how to shut up and read. Education should not even be expensive because a kid can buy a cheap laptop for 1 day minimum wage labor and a more decent laptop for 3 days minimum wage labor. Paper is cheap. Pens are cheap. Handmedown books are cheap. Sure. A bare bones cheap education won't have everything, but it will have enough. The idea that people must go to public school if they can't go to a private school is a complete and total fallacy. Oh. And about social skills. Kids won't learn any social skills by going to a fucked up environment known as a public school. They will only learn to be as fucked up as their peers.

The only problem with homeschooling is that parents are usually too fucking stupid or lazy to choose good curricula for their children and to make sure they are actually learning shit. Parents don't know algebra, chemistry, physics, foreign languages. But there are solutions to this too. One solution is to have two parents in a household. The reason for this is that one parent may know a foreign language while another parent may be good at chemistry, math, and have mechanical skills. But for this to work, the kids need discipline.

Maybe you need to look at our current leaders today and see how they have all been doing well, also take a look at the society and see how we are blessed with diverse numbers of talented professionals in their various specializations, could you believe that almost 90% of them are government schools attendees and ha e passed through the same path to become whom they were today, i will only suggest my opinion that the leaders should create more budgets for the soft runnings of the educational sectors.

The leaders don't know how to lead.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Juse14]

I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.

However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.

And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.

Homes are uncomfortable places for most people since most families are fucked up. I don't care why children are misbehaving. When they are violent, we must consider all public schools as being completely and permanently discredited. When public school students are violent, we must all consider public school graduates as stupid ass morons.

This is quite a complex issue. Many people marry and have children but aren't ready to be parents, which ultimately results in their children not getting what they deserve, whether it's education at home or outside the home, or a proper education.

However, I disagree with your claim that public school graduates are stupid. Because, fundamentally, there are no stupid people, no darkness; there is only the absence of light, which makes a place dark. They aren't stupid because if the educational staff is sufficiently qualified to direct the students' excess energy and creativity, they are not stupid, but they lack a platform to channel their talents and express their creativity. Because their energy and creativity are not directed, they end up being channeled into negative things.

[Fiatless]

Whatever happened to having children with enough discipline to sit down and read a fucking book? BOOKS ARE NOT THAT EXPENSIVE! IF A STUDENT READS BOOKS FOR A COUPLE HOURS A DAY, THAT STUDENT WILL GET A FAR BETTER EDUCATION BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH FREAKS AND IDIOTS RUINING THE EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE!

But if we have to consider the children of parents who are not rich enough to afford a fucking education as stupid ass morons, then so be it. I am not here to play fair when PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE FUCKING VIOLENT HELLHOLES!

How would children know how to read books and understand if they don't go to school? Teachers are well-trained to help children develop their reading and comprehension skills. Most parents don't have such skills, so they might not be able to guide their kids. Self-education is possible after all, some great inventors and creative minds never went to conventional schools.  But I think the school is important for pupils to gain foundational knowledge.

[Frankolala]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools

Not only in United States but everywhere in the world. If you are not rich enough to send your children to a private school, will you sit down and allow your kids to roam around the streets when others are in school. Whatever vices in private schools are also in public schools, and I don't see any much difference in both schools. Some poor people have brilliant children; they attend public schools to learn and come out in flying color. If you are privilege to go to a private school doesn't mean that you are better than those who attended public schools.

[BADecker]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools

Not only in United States but everywhere in the world. If you are not rich enough to send your children to a private school, will you sit down and allow your kids to roam around the streets when others are in school. Whatever vices in private schools are also in public schools, and I don't see any much difference in both schools. Some poor people have brilliant children; they attend public schools to learn and come out in flying color. If you are privilege to go to a private school doesn't mean that you are better than those who attended public schools.

Statistics show that private school attendees are generally far better trained than those who go to public schools... in America, at least. This does NOT make them better people. It only gives them a training advantage in life.

[DeathAngel]

Most parents know what is best for their kids education & needs. I would trust their judgement on what is best for their child over a troll on an internet forum, in all honesty. I don’t think you are qualified to make a broad generalisation about the best education set up for millions of children.

[caroasi]

The reason public schools are generally abusive to children (meaning most of them abuse children) results from the insufficient philosophy development of the modern world. Society has a number of philosophical corruptions at its root resulting from morality actually being a disadvantage at times. Suppose you have a shoplifter and they are told to stop shoplifting by their friend. The shoplifter could easily say "I need gas money in case of a hospital emergency... you value my health don't you?" Likewise, a voter at a voting booth could say "I need money for school, therefore I will vote to take other people's money without permission as taxation, and use that money to fund my child's education". Both cases are trying to make a wrong into a right, but it cannot be done and causes social decay.

What is wrong for one person, is also wrong for a collective. Governments across the world lie, cheat, steal, and kill, but are excused by re-labeling these things as things like national security protection, subsidies, and taxation. Societies deepest problem is that this basic philosophy to avoid hypocrisy has not been fully developed and only began around the renaissance period. This philosophy of equal rights was popularized with the USA bill of rights, but has yet to be genuinely implemented.

People have a concept that society is fully developed. Was society fully developed upon the USA bill of rights? They amended that several times including the concept that people couldn't be chattel slaves. At every time in history we are supposed to believe we have achieved a pinnacle of civilization, when in fact we are only on the road to civilization. Only after society has further explored the concept that being moral is difficult and sometimes even a painful process such as the transition from immoral to moral behavior, will society become civilized in general.

Or put even more broadly, mankind is evil by nature, but through introspection and looking to the divine realm, we can ascend or enlighten to a better position.

[passwordnow]

So every parent who's got kids should send them to private schools instead? I am a product of public school and I think that I've brought the hardship from being there from elementary to highschool. The values that I've learned there is from the oldies that have learned life earlier. This time, I see many public schools that are no longer the same from what it has used to be. I am trying to understand the point of OP but I think that it's just about the new generations adopting new trends and such. Violence comes at a point when there's no more law that's being applied to them. Anyway, I'm doing my best to provide for my kid to send to private school. Maybe home schooling too but I want my kid to adopt social skills.

[jvanname]

Most parents know what is best for their kids education & needs. I would trust their judgement on what is best for their child over a troll on an internet forum, in all honesty. I don’t think you are qualified to make a broad generalisation about the best education set up for millions of children.

Parents do not even listen to their kids. If they did, high schools would not start so late when it is difficult for the students to wake up. Hmm. Maybe there is a reason why teenagers like staying up late. They want to be awake when their parents and other people are asleep because most people are generally unpleasant. For example, you are calling me a troll when I am bringing up legitimate complaints about the public school system; I cannot grant the public schools any legitimacy because they are violent.

So every parent who's got kids should send them to private schools instead? I am a product of public school and I think that I've brought the hardship from being there from elementary to highschool. The values that I've learned there is from the oldies that have learned life earlier. This time, I see many public schools that are no longer the same from what it has used to be. I am trying to understand the point of OP but I think that it's just about the new generations adopting new trends and such. Violence comes at a point when there's no more law that's being applied to them. Anyway, I'm doing my best to provide for my kid to send to private school. Maybe home schooling too but I want my kid to adopt social skills.

On the plus side, if your fucking kids go to public schools, they can get the social skills that they can use in prison or while being waterboarded by the CIA. But on the other hand, they can also learn how to forsake all morality and do as much harm as they can to others as they can get away with. But in reality, public schools teach children very poor social skills. They only compel children to continue the cycle of abuse when they grow up.  Kids need to learn social skills by instead interacting peacefully with siblings, good parents (do they even exist?), pets, and neighbors. YOU PROBABLY DON'T EVEN KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS! WHY THE FUCK DO PEOPLE WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN SAID 'HI' TO THEIR NEIGHBORS ALWAYS WANT TO BITCH ABOUT HOW CHILDREN SHOULD DEVELOP SOCIAL SKILLS?

AND NONE OF YOU HAVE ANY SOCIAL SKILLS ANYONE BECAUSE I CANNOT HAVE A FUCKING CONVERSATION WITH ANYONE THAT LASTS MORE THAN 1 MINUTE! I NEVER HAD AND I NEVER WILL BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE ARE SOCIAL MORONS!

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Hispo]

Let us keep in mind not all parents in the United States have the economical resources to send their children to private schools, in which they would have it harder to meet with all the payments required for their children to complete all years of educations required for them to get all the way until highschool.
There is nothing wrong with attending to a public school and the majority of people in the country turn out being productive members of society, regardless either they had the chance to attend public schools or not.

The important thing one must do is learning to improve one's life in the future.

So are you saying that parents who don't have enough money to feed their kids are not neglecting their children either? By going to public schools, people cannot even understand that BITCOIN DOES NOT EVEN HAVE A MINING ALGORITHM THAT IS DESIGNED TO ADVANCE SCIENCE! The public school system is fucked up, and all the fuckers who attend these institutions are fucked up too because public schools are violent. You see nothing wrong with public schools because you love the violence that happens there.

I don't even know why you are talking about Bitcoin and cryptographic algorithms when it is obvious that neither in middle schools or highschools cryptography is not part of the pensum for those children and teens to learn to begin with, if anything, people start to learn about the fundamental of cryptography in universities. It does not matter whether the highschool people decide to send their children to (public or private) they won't learn anything about the mechanisms which make Blockchains to function, and they won't learn about "reversible cryptography".

Actually, I am not even sure reversible cryptography could function outside the theory, would not it be a violation against the second law of thermodynamics of some Blockchain and mining equipment worked under a process which is supposed to be reversible in the real world? It would imply there would not be loss of energy during the whole functioning time of such imaginary Blockchain. Wouldn't it?