Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 05:42:34 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin is not the answer for microtransactions; how to rebroadcast unconfirmed?  (Read 3884 times)
Krona Rev
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 07, 2014, 07:07:42 PM
 #41

I'm glad your problem seems to be resolved. I've had a similar problem since April 23 -- i.e., over 3 months. I managed to resolve it. I'll share it in case it helps someone in the future.

On April 23 I sent a small transaction from myself to myself. I didn't include a fee. Maybe I was cheap or maybe I forgot. I don't remember. I know the confirmation wasn't urgent. Well, it had been sitting in my wallet "unconfirmed" since then -- for over 3 months. At some point I tried the things described in this thread: rebroadcast with a fee, but it wouldn't get pushed onto the network because it looked like it never would. I waited for the transaction to "fall off" the network so I could resend it, but when I checked every few weeks it was still on blockchain.info as "unconfirmed."

Yesterday I had an idea: Spend the output of the unconfirmed transaction to myself again, but this time with a fee. I thought maybe a miner would confirm the first transaction in the hopes of being able to confirm the next one (the one with the fee). It worked -- and in a way I didn't know possible. Both of the transactions were confirmed in the same block. I didn't know a block could include two transactions, one of which spends from the output of the other, but apparently it's possible.

Conclusion: If there is a transaction that won't confirm due to a low fee, and you are the intended recipient, then just spend the output to yourself with a fee.

Here's the original transaction that was sent in April and confirmed today:

https://blockchain.info/tx/17f723bc265ebbeef77b2b081e29985c30b737025ed6a6547842d3c24d023797

Here's the second transaction confirmed in the same block (314320) with a fee of 0.0004827:

https://blockchain.info/tx/730546e11c79a3399f1fe7f617a7d4ff28edae1c7732180307ca84c2f1e63af2

And that's the story of how I got back my two mbits from 3.5 months of limbo.

Promechard: Proprietary Metablock Chains for Arbitrary Data: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=411974.0
BitcoinGirl325 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 08, 2014, 02:05:13 AM
 #42

I'm glad your problem seems to be resolved. I've had a similar problem since April 23 -- i.e., over 3 months. I managed to resolve it. I'll share it in case it helps someone in the future.

On April 23 I sent a small transaction from myself to myself. I didn't include a fee. Maybe I was cheap or maybe I forgot. I don't remember. I know the confirmation wasn't urgent. Well, it had been sitting in my wallet "unconfirmed" since then -- for over 3 months. At some point I tried the things described in this thread: rebroadcast with a fee, but it wouldn't get pushed onto the network because it looked like it never would. I waited for the transaction to "fall off" the network so I could resend it, but when I checked every few weeks it was still on blockchain.info as "unconfirmed."

Yesterday I had an idea: Spend the output of the unconfirmed transaction to myself again, but this time with a fee. I thought maybe a miner would confirm the first transaction in the hopes of being able to confirm the next one (the one with the fee). It worked -- and in a way I didn't know possible. Both of the transactions were confirmed in the same block. I didn't know a block could include two transactions, one of which spends from the output of the other, but apparently it's possible.

Conclusion: If there is a transaction that won't confirm due to a low fee, and you are the intended recipient, then just spend the output to yourself with a fee.

Here's the original transaction that was sent in April and confirmed today:

https://blockchain.info/tx/17f723bc265ebbeef77b2b081e29985c30b737025ed6a6547842d3c24d023797

Here's the second transaction confirmed in the same block (314320) with a fee of 0.0004827:

https://blockchain.info/tx/730546e11c79a3399f1fe7f617a7d4ff28edae1c7732180307ca84c2f1e63af2

And that's the story of how I got back my two mbits from 3.5 months of limbo.

Wow, this is a fantastic discovery with a surprise positive ending to your story! Congratulations on the terrific sleuthing here!!! Smiley

Which Bitcoin Wallet software did you use that enabled you to spend the unconfirmed output?? I ask because I know that some clients will not let people spend the unconfirmed output while the original transaction is still pending.

If you enjoyed my post or found it helpful, please feel free to donate BTC to me at: 15UKsghaHeLAtidySEHmPXBWRjBMM1Tw4u
Krona Rev
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 08, 2014, 06:29:41 PM
 #43

I was using the ordinary Bitcoin-QT client (0.9.2.1). I used the debug console to create the transaction using the commands:

createrawtransaction ...
signrawtransaction ...
sendrawtransaction ...

I don't think Bitcoin-QT gives a way to choose which coins to spend using ordinary (GUI) methods.

Promechard: Proprietary Metablock Chains for Arbitrary Data: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=411974.0
BitcoinGirl325 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 08, 2014, 06:47:40 PM
 #44

I was using the ordinary Bitcoin-QT client (0.9.2.1). I used the debug console to create the transaction using the commands:

createrawtransaction ...
signrawtransaction ...
sendrawtransaction ...

I don't think Bitcoin-QT gives a way to choose which coins to spend using ordinary (GUI) methods.

Ahhh… I see. Thanks so much for the clarification! Okay, so if this were to happen to me in the future, I would need to figure out those 3 commands and use the debug console.

If you enjoyed my post or found it helpful, please feel free to donate BTC to me at: 15UKsghaHeLAtidySEHmPXBWRjBMM1Tw4u
wasserman99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 09, 2014, 12:24:36 AM
 #45

The transaction finally "fell off" of Blockchain.info, which was the node that was holding onto it and keeping it "stuck". It took 4 days, but I got my coins back! Smiley I then sent them again with the appropriate fee and everything is now good. Smiley
Most nodes usually will "forget" a TX after 24 hours if not confirmed. If your wallet is connected to a node that has "forgotten" a unconfirmed TX then you can rebroadcast the TX with a higher fee.

bigasic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 09, 2014, 12:28:49 AM
 #46

I was under the impression that Bitcoin would be the answer for sending micro payments over the Internet, but that is apparently not the case at all.

With a .0001 BTC required transaction fee for all transactions under .01 BTC, that amounts to a 6% transaction fee (at today's exchange rates) for a $1 USD transaction. And that equates to a 12% fee for a $.50 USD transaction. These fees are significantly higher than credit card fees, Paypal fees, Western Union fees, and even foreign exchange rate fees.

A few days ago, I didn't realize any of this information (i.e. the required fees), so I tried to send $1 worth of BTC to a friend WITHOUT a transaction fee to show him how "amazing" this new technology is. Turns out to be not very amazing at all, because the transaction never confirmed because of the lack of the transaction fee. Worst of all, there seems to be nothing I can do about it... I can't even add the 6% fee to it now, in order to get it confirmed! Sad

I used the BitWallet app on iOS to send the transaction, and the hash of the transaction is: c238d939b330b682abe1c729300636600254c23c67e1eea4e8daa9abc26dd2c5

So now the transaction is in a permanent limbo state that can't be resolved, and I have effectively paid a 100% transaction fee because the money is in limbo. Sad

Is there anything I can do to rebroadcast this transaction with the appropriate fee, so it actually confirms?

Well, not really, have you gone into a convenience store lately? Most of them say "5 dollar  minimum to use a credit card or debit card" because when they take credit cards they are charge a 30 cent or so fee just to do the transaction, then the 3-7 or so percent. then when the batch is uploaded for the day they are charged a batch fee, which is usually 20-50 cents for the entire day. so, 12 cents to take btc for a tiny amount still beats taking credit cards, though I would like it changed..
hamiltino
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


P2P The Planet!


View Profile
August 09, 2014, 03:26:03 AM
Last edit: August 09, 2014, 03:36:53 AM by hamiltino
 #47

Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.

idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees.


stacking coin
MineForeman.com
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
August 09, 2014, 04:56:56 AM
 #48

Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.

idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees.



Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place?

That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet.

Neil

Bitcoin News http://mineforeman.com/ || MinePeon - Bitcoin mining on the Raspberry PI http://mineforeman.com/minepeon/ || MinePeon Wiki http://minepeon.com/ || MinePeon Forums http://minepeon.com/forums/
sed
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 09, 2014, 05:06:02 AM
 #49


As a heads up future versions of the mainline client will reduce the min fee to relay from 100 bits (.0001 BTC) to 1 bits (.00001 BTC).  Still small txns will never be free.  Low cost yes, but free no.   The fees act as a denial of service prevention mechanism.  


FTFY.  "bits"?!
hamiltino
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


P2P The Planet!


View Profile
August 09, 2014, 05:19:40 AM
 #50

Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.

idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees.



Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place?

That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet.

Neil

safecoin does not use a blockchain and yes it is decentralized. Check out the systemDocs: http://maidsafe.net/SystemDocs/

stacking coin
sandykho47
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 251

Knowledge its everything


View Profile
August 09, 2014, 05:38:10 AM
 #51

Yeah, i think 10k satoshi ($0.06) is too big for small payment
Last time i try to send some BTC with 0.00001 fee. take 4 hours just for 1 confirmation  Sad

You can rebroadcast unconfirmed with higher fee
anyway, i think minimum fee for nom is 0.00005 BTC

if you very small fee payment, use dogecoin
the fee is about 1 - 2 dogecoin (35 - 70 satoshi) only  Grin

Kemampuanku Tidak semua orang memiliki dan dapat melakukannya . Tidak memakan kaum sendiri . dan mempunyai kode etik yang tidak masuk akal.
Ayers
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1024


Vave.com - Crypto Casino


View Profile
August 09, 2014, 01:11:40 PM
 #52

Example : With android bitcoin wallet, i can only send the minimal 0,06 mBTC (0,02 Euros).
Fees = 0,10 mBTC ...




What is a "micro-payment" ?

this problem is here only because bitcoin isn't at fully potential, i mean price of btc is still in his infancy, with a better price problem like this will not occur anymore

gtraah
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 09, 2014, 01:27:58 PM
 #53

Dogecoin is more suited for microtransactions. And the OP problem is why competition amongst cryptocurrencies is good.

LOL , It may be ok because its worth next to nothing. But mainstream are still struggling to adopt BTC and now we talking dogecoin, a coin with a picture of a dog on it? Man i never understood that stupid image, Dogs & Money is just ridiculous mix.

If micro-payments is what the market really REALLY wants and needs, the clients will be modified to make it plausible...  Gavin mentioned something about adjustable fees at the last meeting which will be coming out in one of the next versions, not sure exactly is this will sort it a little. But anyway at this point of time its not needed,  if even 25% of users and larger companies start opting for throwing money to invest into the startups And start creating applications around this tipping market.. THIS is when clients or core will be modified slightly to enable this type of thing
gtraah
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 09, 2014, 01:29:12 PM
 #54

Example : With android bitcoin wallet, i can only send the minimal 0,06 mBTC (0,02 Euros).
Fees = 0,10 mBTC ...




What is a "micro-payment" ?

this problem is here only because bitcoin isn't at fully potential, i mean price of btc is still in his infancy, with a better price problem like this will not occur anymore

+1  devs are working on this also . Its being talked about
gtraah
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 09, 2014, 01:49:50 PM
 #55

At the moment Micro-transactions are not that bad really

 Fee =  0.00005 BTC is ---- 3 cents

If you want to tip someone 5 Cents it means you need to send 8 Cents to include the fee, that really isnt that bad, I think you can manage even less fees.

And on top of this, when the fee things gets sorted , fees should change to depending how much or how little your sending. I was watching the last video of the core devs speaking . I think it was in Amsterdam, they brought the fee thing up and said it will be coming in the next version or seomthing.
MineForeman.com
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PM
 #56

Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.

idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees.



Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place?

That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet.

Neil

safecoin does not use a blockchain and yes it is decentralized. Check out the systemDocs: http://maidsafe.net/SystemDocs/

Nice marketspeak (Still don't know how safecoin gets around the problem).

Neil

Bitcoin News http://mineforeman.com/ || MinePeon - Bitcoin mining on the Raspberry PI http://mineforeman.com/minepeon/ || MinePeon Wiki http://minepeon.com/ || MinePeon Forums http://minepeon.com/forums/
Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 988
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 11, 2014, 05:29:25 AM
 #57

Yeah, i think 10k satoshi ($0.06) is too big for small payment
Last time i try to send some BTC with 0.00001 fee. take 4 hours just for 1 confirmation  Sad

You can rebroadcast unconfirmed with higher fee
anyway, i think minimum fee for nom is 0.00005 BTC

if you very small fee payment, use dogecoin
the fee is about 1 - 2 dogecoin (35 - 70 satoshi) only  Grin
If you send with less then the recommend TX fee then you are more or less sending without a fee at all. A smaller fee may speed up confirmation somewhat but it will still take a long time if it confirms at all.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!