Krona Rev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 07, 2014, 07:07:42 PM |
|
I'm glad your problem seems to be resolved. I've had a similar problem since April 23 -- i.e., over 3 months. I managed to resolve it. I'll share it in case it helps someone in the future. On April 23 I sent a small transaction from myself to myself. I didn't include a fee. Maybe I was cheap or maybe I forgot. I don't remember. I know the confirmation wasn't urgent. Well, it had been sitting in my wallet "unconfirmed" since then -- for over 3 months. At some point I tried the things described in this thread: rebroadcast with a fee, but it wouldn't get pushed onto the network because it looked like it never would. I waited for the transaction to "fall off" the network so I could resend it, but when I checked every few weeks it was still on blockchain.info as "unconfirmed." Yesterday I had an idea: Spend the output of the unconfirmed transaction to myself again, but this time with a fee. I thought maybe a miner would confirm the first transaction in the hopes of being able to confirm the next one (the one with the fee). It worked -- and in a way I didn't know possible. Both of the transactions were confirmed in the same block. I didn't know a block could include two transactions, one of which spends from the output of the other, but apparently it's possible. Conclusion: If there is a transaction that won't confirm due to a low fee, and you are the intended recipient, then just spend the output to yourself with a fee. Here's the original transaction that was sent in April and confirmed today: https://blockchain.info/tx/17f723bc265ebbeef77b2b081e29985c30b737025ed6a6547842d3c24d023797Here's the second transaction confirmed in the same block (314320) with a fee of 0.0004827: https://blockchain.info/tx/730546e11c79a3399f1fe7f617a7d4ff28edae1c7732180307ca84c2f1e63af2And that's the story of how I got back my two mbits from 3.5 months of limbo.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl325 (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2014, 02:05:13 AM |
|
I'm glad your problem seems to be resolved. I've had a similar problem since April 23 -- i.e., over 3 months. I managed to resolve it. I'll share it in case it helps someone in the future. On April 23 I sent a small transaction from myself to myself. I didn't include a fee. Maybe I was cheap or maybe I forgot. I don't remember. I know the confirmation wasn't urgent. Well, it had been sitting in my wallet "unconfirmed" since then -- for over 3 months. At some point I tried the things described in this thread: rebroadcast with a fee, but it wouldn't get pushed onto the network because it looked like it never would. I waited for the transaction to "fall off" the network so I could resend it, but when I checked every few weeks it was still on blockchain.info as "unconfirmed." Yesterday I had an idea: Spend the output of the unconfirmed transaction to myself again, but this time with a fee. I thought maybe a miner would confirm the first transaction in the hopes of being able to confirm the next one (the one with the fee). It worked -- and in a way I didn't know possible. Both of the transactions were confirmed in the same block. I didn't know a block could include two transactions, one of which spends from the output of the other, but apparently it's possible. Conclusion: If there is a transaction that won't confirm due to a low fee, and you are the intended recipient, then just spend the output to yourself with a fee. Here's the original transaction that was sent in April and confirmed today: https://blockchain.info/tx/17f723bc265ebbeef77b2b081e29985c30b737025ed6a6547842d3c24d023797Here's the second transaction confirmed in the same block (314320) with a fee of 0.0004827: https://blockchain.info/tx/730546e11c79a3399f1fe7f617a7d4ff28edae1c7732180307ca84c2f1e63af2And that's the story of how I got back my two mbits from 3.5 months of limbo. Wow, this is a fantastic discovery with a surprise positive ending to your story! Congratulations on the terrific sleuthing here!!! Which Bitcoin Wallet software did you use that enabled you to spend the unconfirmed output?? I ask because I know that some clients will not let people spend the unconfirmed output while the original transaction is still pending.
|
If you enjoyed my post or found it helpful, please feel free to donate BTC to me at: 15UKsghaHeLAtidySEHmPXBWRjBMM1Tw4u
|
|
|
Krona Rev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2014, 06:29:41 PM |
|
I was using the ordinary Bitcoin-QT client (0.9.2.1). I used the debug console to create the transaction using the commands:
createrawtransaction ... signrawtransaction ... sendrawtransaction ...
I don't think Bitcoin-QT gives a way to choose which coins to spend using ordinary (GUI) methods.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinGirl325 (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2014, 06:47:40 PM |
|
I was using the ordinary Bitcoin-QT client (0.9.2.1). I used the debug console to create the transaction using the commands:
createrawtransaction ... signrawtransaction ... sendrawtransaction ...
I don't think Bitcoin-QT gives a way to choose which coins to spend using ordinary (GUI) methods.
Ahhh… I see. Thanks so much for the clarification! Okay, so if this were to happen to me in the future, I would need to figure out those 3 commands and use the debug console.
|
If you enjoyed my post or found it helpful, please feel free to donate BTC to me at: 15UKsghaHeLAtidySEHmPXBWRjBMM1Tw4u
|
|
|
wasserman99
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 12:24:36 AM |
|
The transaction finally "fell off" of Blockchain.info, which was the node that was holding onto it and keeping it "stuck". It took 4 days, but I got my coins back! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I then sent them again with the appropriate fee and everything is now good. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Most nodes usually will "forget" a TX after 24 hours if not confirmed. If your wallet is connected to a node that has "forgotten" a unconfirmed TX then you can rebroadcast the TX with a higher fee.
|
|
|
|
bigasic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 12:28:49 AM |
|
I was under the impression that Bitcoin would be the answer for sending micro payments over the Internet, but that is apparently not the case at all. With a .0001 BTC required transaction fee for all transactions under .01 BTC, that amounts to a 6% transaction fee (at today's exchange rates) for a $1 USD transaction. And that equates to a 12% fee for a $.50 USD transaction. These fees are significantly higher than credit card fees, Paypal fees, Western Union fees, and even foreign exchange rate fees. A few days ago, I didn't realize any of this information (i.e. the required fees), so I tried to send $1 worth of BTC to a friend WITHOUT a transaction fee to show him how "amazing" this new technology is. Turns out to be not very amazing at all, because the transaction never confirmed because of the lack of the transaction fee. Worst of all, there seems to be nothing I can do about it... I can't even add the 6% fee to it now, in order to get it confirmed! ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I used the BitWallet app on iOS to send the transaction, and the hash of the transaction is: c238d939b330b682abe1c729300636600254c23c67e1eea4e8daa9abc26dd2c5 So now the transaction is in a permanent limbo state that can't be resolved, and I have effectively paid a 100% transaction fee because the money is in limbo. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Is there anything I can do to rebroadcast this transaction with the appropriate fee, so it actually confirms? Well, not really, have you gone into a convenience store lately? Most of them say "5 dollar minimum to use a credit card or debit card" because when they take credit cards they are charge a 30 cent or so fee just to do the transaction, then the 3-7 or so percent. then when the batch is uploaded for the day they are charged a batch fee, which is usually 20-50 cents for the entire day. so, 12 cents to take btc for a tiny amount still beats taking credit cards, though I would like it changed..
|
|
|
|
hamiltino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:26:03 AM Last edit: August 09, 2014, 03:36:53 AM by hamiltino |
|
Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.
idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees.
|
stacking coin
|
|
|
MineForeman.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:56:56 AM |
|
Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.
idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees. Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place? That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet. Neil
|
|
|
|
sed
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 05:06:02 AM |
|
As a heads up future versions of the mainline client will reduce the min fee to relay from 100 bits (.0001 BTC) to 1 bits (.00001 BTC). Still small txns will never be free. Low cost yes, but free no. The fees act as a denial of service prevention mechanism.
FTFY. "bits"?!
|
|
|
|
hamiltino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 05:19:40 AM |
|
Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.
idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees. Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place? That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet. Neil safecoin does not use a blockchain and yes it is decentralized. Check out the systemDocs: http://maidsafe.net/SystemDocs/
|
stacking coin
|
|
|
sandykho47
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
Knowledge its everything
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 05:38:10 AM |
|
Yeah, i think 10k satoshi ($0.06) is too big for small payment Last time i try to send some BTC with 0.00001 fee. take 4 hours just for 1 confirmation ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) You can rebroadcast unconfirmed with higher fee anyway, i think minimum fee for nom is 0.00005 BTC if you very small fee payment, use dogecoin the fee is about 1 - 2 dogecoin (35 - 70 satoshi) only ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
Kemampuanku Tidak semua orang memiliki dan dapat melakukannya . Tidak memakan kaum sendiri . dan mempunyai kode etik yang tidak masuk akal.
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 01:11:40 PM |
|
Example : With android bitcoin wallet, i can only send the minimal 0,06 mBTC (0,02 Euros). Fees = 0,10 mBTC ...
What is a "micro-payment" ?
this problem is here only because bitcoin isn't at fully potential, i mean price of btc is still in his infancy, with a better price problem like this will not occur anymore
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 01:27:58 PM |
|
Dogecoin is more suited for microtransactions. And the OP problem is why competition amongst cryptocurrencies is good.
LOL , It may be ok because its worth next to nothing. But mainstream are still struggling to adopt BTC and now we talking dogecoin, a coin with a picture of a dog on it? Man i never understood that stupid image, Dogs & Money is just ridiculous mix. If micro-payments is what the market really REALLY wants and needs, the clients will be modified to make it plausible... Gavin mentioned something about adjustable fees at the last meeting which will be coming out in one of the next versions, not sure exactly is this will sort it a little. But anyway at this point of time its not needed, if even 25% of users and larger companies start opting for throwing money to invest into the startups And start creating applications around this tipping market.. THIS is when clients or core will be modified slightly to enable this type of thing
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 01:29:12 PM |
|
Example : With android bitcoin wallet, i can only send the minimal 0,06 mBTC (0,02 Euros). Fees = 0,10 mBTC ...
What is a "micro-payment" ?
this problem is here only because bitcoin isn't at fully potential, i mean price of btc is still in his infancy, with a better price problem like this will not occur anymore +1 devs are working on this also . Its being talked about
|
|
|
|
gtraah
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 01:49:50 PM |
|
At the moment Micro-transactions are not that bad really
Fee = 0.00005 BTC is ---- 3 cents
If you want to tip someone 5 Cents it means you need to send 8 Cents to include the fee, that really isnt that bad, I think you can manage even less fees.
And on top of this, when the fee things gets sorted , fees should change to depending how much or how little your sending. I was watching the last video of the core devs speaking . I think it was in Amsterdam, they brought the fee thing up and said it will be coming in the next version or seomthing.
|
|
|
|
MineForeman.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 10:14:04 PM |
|
Cryptocurrencies will either be widely accepted or useful for microtransactions. They can't be both.
idiotic statement... safecoin will have no transaction fees. Really? What stops some malicious person filling up safecoins blockchain with terabytes of junk by transferring inputs around the place? That is the main problem that fee's solve with bitcoin at the moment, it is not really about paying the miners yet. Neil safecoin does not use a blockchain and yes it is decentralized. Check out the systemDocs: http://maidsafe.net/SystemDocs/Nice marketspeak (Still don't know how safecoin gets around the problem). Neil
|
|
|
|
Mobius
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2014, 05:29:25 AM |
|
Yeah, i think 10k satoshi ($0.06) is too big for small payment Last time i try to send some BTC with 0.00001 fee. take 4 hours just for 1 confirmation ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) You can rebroadcast unconfirmed with higher fee anyway, i think minimum fee for nom is 0.00005 BTC if you very small fee payment, use dogecoin the fee is about 1 - 2 dogecoin (35 - 70 satoshi) only ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) If you send with less then the recommend TX fee then you are more or less sending without a fee at all. A smaller fee may speed up confirmation somewhat but it will still take a long time if it confirms at all.
|
|
|
|
|