THE NEW RAPE RULES WHICH WILL INFANTILISE WOMEN AND CRIMINALISE INNOCENT MEN

[ObscureBean]

It's the system desperately trying to balance itself out. To western/developed countries it definitely feels unfair but with the world tending to 'oneness' you gotta look at the system as a whole. Statistically rape cases are overwhelmingly in favor of men. In places like India, gang-raping women is a daily business and most of the time the men get away with it. In the rare cases where the woman wins, she still loses because her life within society is pretty much over anyway.

So if this is the case, and you have all that information, how come all those feminists can't read the same data and help their sisters out in india and in all those countries women are killed and stoned to death on a whim?

Let me give you some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777707.0


Oneness to the image of whom?

As a fair warning you're probably not gonna like what I'm about to say 
 
First off, a 'cause' that needs defending is never worth fighting for. A truly legitimate 'cause' exists in and of itself without any perceived external support. The only analogy that can adequately paint a picture of this statement is this: The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.
The reason feminists are not rushing over to help their 'sisters' is simple, they're fighting a cause borne of artificiality which means they need to draw the line somewhere. And this line will invariably be at a safe distance from their physical selves (here I mean physical as an all-encompassing self). 

Now my answer to your second question is gonna stretch the limits of credibility even further.
I'll start off with the grounds for oneness. This is pure logic and shouldn't be hard to grasp. Humans have been treading the path of knowledge for a while now. The nature of knowledge is to systematically swallow and incorporate into itself everything it encounters. Since the earth is only finite, it was always going to be a matter of time before awareness seeped into every nook and cranny. We are now in the age of unification with the 'world' working to strengthen the bind on its parts and concretizing it's 'self'. Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.

It would've been easier if you hadn't included that last bit 'to the image of whom'  The answer is 'the world'. Emergence of sentience.

[Wilikon]

It's the system desperately trying to balance itself out. To western/developed countries it definitely feels unfair but with the world tending to 'oneness' you gotta look at the system as a whole. Statistically rape cases are overwhelmingly in favor of men. In places like India, gang-raping women is a daily business and most of the time the men get away with it. In the rare cases where the woman wins, she still loses because her life within society is pretty much over anyway.

So if this is the case, and you have all that information, how come all those feminists can't read the same data and help their sisters out in india and in all those countries women are killed and stoned to death on a whim?

Let me give you some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777707.0


Oneness to the image of whom?

As a fair warning you're probably not gonna like what I'm about to say  
 
First off, a 'cause' that needs defending is never worth fighting for. A truly legitimate 'cause' exists in and of itself without any perceived external support. The only analogy that can adequately paint a picture of this statement is this: The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.
The reason feminists are not rushing over to help their 'sisters' is simple, they're fighting a cause borne of artificiality which means they need to draw the line somewhere. And this line will invariably be at a safe distance from their physical selves (here I mean physical as an all-encompassing self).  

Now my answer to your second question is gonna stretch the limits of credibility even further.
I'll start off with the grounds for oneness. This is pure logic and shouldn't be hard to grasp. Humans have been treading the path of knowledge for a while now. The nature of knowledge is to systematically swallow and incorporate into itself everything it encounters. Since the earth is only finite, it was always going to be a matter of time before awareness seeped into every nook and cranny. We are now in the age of unification with the 'world' working to strengthen the bind on its parts and concretizing it's 'self'. Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.

It would've been easier if you hadn't included that last bit 'to the image of whom'   The answer is 'the world'. Emergence of sentience.

If I understand you correctly:


A) Earth/Gaia is better off without humans. Even though Gaia, as far as science tells us in 2015, is responsible for the creation of humans through a slow process of millions of years of evolution... The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.


B) The third wave feminists draw a line that is strangely compatible with other third wave feminists that are able to use the same tools to define their all-encompassing cosmos: twitter feeds and facebook 'friends'. If you cannot have the $$$ for the latest smart phone, a high speed internet connection, or if english is not your first language, then you are out of this beautiful all-encompassing third wave feminist universe, A.K.A. the Coca Cola, Pepsi, Apple, Google, 500 channels cable subscription on your latest Samsung LED 4K UHD TV, grass juice every morning, only cooking in FAIR TRADE coconut oil, groupon, Pilates exercises before jumping to the subway, listening to spotify while reading what oprah told the third wave feminist to read on their kindle... ... universe.


C) Oneness is defined by: Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.. If you are a woman and you carry your produce on your head for 20 miles, bare foot, to meet potential buyers to the village's market, everyday, you are not part of Oneness. The flies bothering your little donkey carrying 100s of pounds of your hard labor are not part of Oneness either. Actually you WILL be part of Oneness, voluntary or not, as Oneness is whatever the 'superior culture' is when it destroys and swallow you whole, you and your traditions, your little donkey, flies included. BUT the swallowing will be for the good of your tribe. Oneness will tell you to stop killing those cute seals you used to feed yourself on because it is barbaric and uncooked... Oneness will tell you how many you can kill per month, then will send you food stamps for that brand new mini market shaped as a container it has sent you... Oneness will tell you no one from your village is free to roam in 'your' forest anymore, the way your ancestors did for thousands of years, as it is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site...


No fair warning for all those indigenous people around the globe, they probably not gonna like what your definition of Oneness is about to do to them, as Oneness is a pretty small club of narrow minded selfish bunch of Caramel Brulée Frappuccino® Blended Coffee drinking humans with a Wifi connection...

[jaysabi]

Call ME old fashioned, but I consider a marriage certificate (or its equivalent) an eternal consent form. (At least until death or divorce do you part.)

You say that as your defense in court, and I'll vote to convict on a charge of rape, no question. That's an indefensible attitude.

[(oYo)]

Call ME old fashioned, but I consider a marriage certificate (or its equivalent) an eternal consent form. (At least until death or divorce do you part.)

You say that as your defense in court, and I'll vote to convict on a charge of rape, no question. That's an indefensible attitude.

Settle down, I'm not a rapist. Naturally I respect everyone's right to say no, even though I don't quite understand it. If you're not happy with your spouse you need to get that shit sorted out and if you can't then just seperate. I get that this is an unpopular opinion and that I'm an easy target for a SJW, but if you are in a happy and healthy relationship, explain to me the reason for denying your partner sex. If indeed you are just too tired or not in the mood it still won't kill you to sacrifice a few minutes to keep your partner happy.

Instead of just saying no means no, which I've already admitted that I respect, perhaps you can better explain your reasoning behind why you would refuse sex to your partner, while still maintaining a healthy relationship with them.

[ObscureBean]

It's the system desperately trying to balance itself out. To western/developed countries it definitely feels unfair but with the world tending to 'oneness' you gotta look at the system as a whole. Statistically rape cases are overwhelmingly in favor of men. In places like India, gang-raping women is a daily business and most of the time the men get away with it. In the rare cases where the woman wins, she still loses because her life within society is pretty much over anyway.

So if this is the case, and you have all that information, how come all those feminists can't read the same data and help their sisters out in india and in all those countries women are killed and stoned to death on a whim?

Let me give you some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777707.0


Oneness to the image of whom?

As a fair warning you're probably not gonna like what I'm about to say  
 
First off, a 'cause' that needs defending is never worth fighting for. A truly legitimate 'cause' exists in and of itself without any perceived external support. The only analogy that can adequately paint a picture of this statement is this: The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.
The reason feminists are not rushing over to help their 'sisters' is simple, they're fighting a cause borne of artificiality which means they need to draw the line somewhere. And this line will invariably be at a safe distance from their physical selves (here I mean physical as an all-encompassing self).  

Now my answer to your second question is gonna stretch the limits of credibility even further.
I'll start off with the grounds for oneness. This is pure logic and shouldn't be hard to grasp. Humans have been treading the path of knowledge for a while now. The nature of knowledge is to systematically swallow and incorporate into itself everything it encounters. Since the earth is only finite, it was always going to be a matter of time before awareness seeped into every nook and cranny. We are now in the age of unification with the 'world' working to strengthen the bind on its parts and concretizing it's 'self'. Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.

It would've been easier if you hadn't included that last bit 'to the image of whom'   The answer is 'the world'. Emergence of sentience.

If I understand you correctly:


A) Earth/Gaia is better off without humans. Even though Gaia, as far as science tells us in 2015, is responsible for the creation of humans through a slow process of millions of years of evolution... The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.


B) The third wave feminists draw a line that is strangely compatible with other third wave feminists that are able to use the same tools to define their all-encompassing cosmos: twitter feeds and facebook 'friends'. If you cannot have the $$$ for the latest smart phone, a high speed internet connection, or if english is not your first language, then you are out of this beautiful all-encompassing third wave feminist universe, A.K.A. the Coca Cola, Pepsi, Apple, Google, 500 channels cable subscription on your latest Samsung LED 4K UHD TV, grass juice every morning, only cooking in FAIR TRADE coconut oil, groupon, Pilates exercises before jumping to the subway, listening to spotify while reading what oprah told the third wave feminist to read on their kindle... ... universe.


C) Oneness is defined by: Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.. If you are a woman and you carry your produce on your head for 20 miles, bare foot, to meet potential buyers to the village's market, everyday, you are not part of Oneness. The flies bothering your little donkey carrying 100s of pounds of your hard labor are not part of Oneness either. Actually you WILL be part of Oneness, voluntary or not, as Oneness is whatever the 'superior culture' is when it destroys and swallow you whole, you and your traditions, your little donkey, flies included. BUT the swallowing will be for the good of your tribe. Oneness will tell you to stop killing those cute seals you used to feed yourself on because it is barbaric and uncooked... Oneness will tell you how many you can kill per month, then will send you food stamps for that brand new mini market shaped as a container it has sent you... Oneness will tell you no one from your village is free to roam in 'your' forest anymore, the way your ancestors did for thousands of years, as it is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site...


No fair warning for all those indigenous people around the globe, they probably not gonna like what your definition of Oneness is about to do to them, as Oneness is a pretty small club of narrow minded selfish bunch of Caramel Brulée Frappuccino® Blended Coffee drinking humans with a Wifi connection...

Your stance is commendable and noble 

However you underestimate the implications of my comment.

Knowledge, therefore the current world, thrives exclusively on 'differences'. If everything is the same, then there is nothing to learn and the illusion of power fades.
Money (is power | includes all forms of barter be it physical or emotional) is the primary means for spreading knowledge. Humans can be from any walks of life and belong to any schools of thought but the underlying structure that supports the (human) way of life is the same for all: knowledge. If knowledge thrives on differences then it's not hard to imagine that the greater the differences the more knowledge there exists. And if knowledge is synonymous with power, then the greater the differences the more power there exists.
In the context of the current world, money only works because of the difference between the rich and poor. The bigger the gap between those 2 extremities the more knowledge the 'world' gains, the faster science progresses.
Outwardly it would appear that rich people are privileged and have it easy but this is only the age-old illusion of 'the grass is always greener on the other side'. Rich people long for freedom and poor people long for money. Truth is nobody has a say in any of this, not really anyway. For as long as you play the game of knowledge, you will be bound by its terms whether you be a fat cat or a lowly peasant.

[Wilikon]

It's the system desperately trying to balance itself out. To western/developed countries it definitely feels unfair but with the world tending to 'oneness' you gotta look at the system as a whole. Statistically rape cases are overwhelmingly in favor of men. In places like India, gang-raping women is a daily business and most of the time the men get away with it. In the rare cases where the woman wins, she still loses because her life within society is pretty much over anyway.

So if this is the case, and you have all that information, how come all those feminists can't read the same data and help their sisters out in india and in all those countries women are killed and stoned to death on a whim?

Let me give you some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777707.0


Oneness to the image of whom?

As a fair warning you're probably not gonna like what I'm about to say  
 
First off, a 'cause' that needs defending is never worth fighting for. A truly legitimate 'cause' exists in and of itself without any perceived external support. The only analogy that can adequately paint a picture of this statement is this: The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.
The reason feminists are not rushing over to help their 'sisters' is simple, they're fighting a cause borne of artificiality which means they need to draw the line somewhere. And this line will invariably be at a safe distance from their physical selves (here I mean physical as an all-encompassing self).  

Now my answer to your second question is gonna stretch the limits of credibility even further.
I'll start off with the grounds for oneness. This is pure logic and shouldn't be hard to grasp. Humans have been treading the path of knowledge for a while now. The nature of knowledge is to systematically swallow and incorporate into itself everything it encounters. Since the earth is only finite, it was always going to be a matter of time before awareness seeped into every nook and cranny. We are now in the age of unification with the 'world' working to strengthen the bind on its parts and concretizing it's 'self'. Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.

It would've been easier if you hadn't included that last bit 'to the image of whom'   The answer is 'the world'. Emergence of sentience.

If I understand you correctly:


A) Earth/Gaia is better off without humans. Even though Gaia, as far as science tells us in 2015, is responsible for the creation of humans through a slow process of millions of years of evolution... The seamless integration of life with it's environment in a virgin (human-free) ecosystem.


B) The third wave feminists draw a line that is strangely compatible with other third wave feminists that are able to use the same tools to define their all-encompassing cosmos: twitter feeds and facebook 'friends'. If you cannot have the $$$ for the latest smart phone, a high speed internet connection, or if english is not your first language, then you are out of this beautiful all-encompassing third wave feminist universe, A.K.A. the Coca Cola, Pepsi, Apple, Google, 500 channels cable subscription on your latest Samsung LED 4K UHD TV, grass juice every morning, only cooking in FAIR TRADE coconut oil, groupon, Pilates exercises before jumping to the subway, listening to spotify while reading what oprah told the third wave feminist to read on their kindle... ... universe.


C) Oneness is defined by: Cars, planes, ships (etc) for the physical aspect and books, phones and internet (etc) for mental. One world.. If you are a woman and you carry your produce on your head for 20 miles, bare foot, to meet potential buyers to the village's market, everyday, you are not part of Oneness. The flies bothering your little donkey carrying 100s of pounds of your hard labor are not part of Oneness either. Actually you WILL be part of Oneness, voluntary or not, as Oneness is whatever the 'superior culture' is when it destroys and swallow you whole, you and your traditions, your little donkey, flies included. BUT the swallowing will be for the good of your tribe. Oneness will tell you to stop killing those cute seals you used to feed yourself on because it is barbaric and uncooked... Oneness will tell you how many you can kill per month, then will send you food stamps for that brand new mini market shaped as a container it has sent you... Oneness will tell you no one from your village is free to roam in 'your' forest anymore, the way your ancestors did for thousands of years, as it is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site...


No fair warning for all those indigenous people around the globe, they probably not gonna like what your definition of Oneness is about to do to them, as Oneness is a pretty small club of narrow minded selfish bunch of Caramel Brulée Frappuccino® Blended Coffee drinking humans with a Wifi connection...

Your stance is commendable and noble 

However you underestimate the implications of my comment.

Knowledge, therefore the current world, thrives exclusively on 'differences'. If everything is the same, then there is nothing to learn and the illusion of power fades.
Money (is power | includes all forms of barter be it physical or emotional) is the primary means for spreading knowledge. Humans can be from any walks of life and belong to any schools of thought but the underlying structure that supports the (human) way of life is the same for all: knowledge. If knowledge thrives on differences then it's not hard to imagine that the greater the differences the more knowledge there exists. And if knowledge is synonymous with power, then the greater the differences the more power there exists.
In the context of the current world, money only works because of the difference between the rich and poor. The bigger the gap between those 2 extremities the more knowledge the 'world' gains, the faster science progresses.
Outwardly it would appear that rich people are privileged and have it easy but this is only the age-old illusion of 'the grass is always greener on the other side'. Rich people long for freedom and poor people long for money. Truth is nobody has a say in any of this, not really anyway. For as long as you play the game of knowledge, you will be bound by its terms whether you be a fat cat or a lowly peasant.

We obviously belong to the rich people class as we both know what a bitcoin is, what a frappuccino is, what buying fair trade coconut oil means. For very poor people, having $10000 or $100000 or $1000000 or $1000000000 of asset is the same for them, when they look at us.

We love our definition of Oneness. "Oneness to the image of whom?" I asked. The answer was simple: our image.


Rich people long for not losing the power they have, poor people long for happiness they've yet to have...