What Do You Want in a Signature Campaign?

[BitCoinNutJob]

I guess everyone would say this and only the bitcoin businesses can decide their budget but if the price stays this low i'd vote my number 1 want as higher rates.  Its not like bit-x isn't paying the highest rate vs other campaigns already afaik so understandable to keep pay the same.

[marcotheminer]

My only suggestion is the payment to a regular BTC address. I think this campaign is run very well...payment is good. Well done so far Marco!

Thank you!

[Quickseller]

I guess everyone would say this and only the bitcoin businesses can decide their budget but if the price stays this low i'd vote my number 1 want as higher rates.  Its not like bit-x isn't paying the highest rate vs other campaigns already afaik so understandable to keep pay the same.

The current rates that bit-x is paying are in line with what other pay per post campaigns have paid in the past, and in some cases are higher.

I would say with a good amount of certainty that marco will get a good number of additional participants once he offers payments directly to user's btc addresses

[BitCoinNutJob]

I guess everyone would say this and only the bitcoin businesses can decide their budget but if the price stays this low i'd vote my number 1 want as higher rates.  Its not like bit-x isn't paying the highest rate vs other campaigns already afaik so understandable to keep pay the same.

The current rates that bit-x is paying are in line with what other pay per post campaigns have paid in the past, and in some cases are higher.

I would say with a good amount of certainty that marco will get a good number of additional participants once he offers payments directly to user's btc addresses

It doesnt make much difference to me where the deposit goes, the withdraw took 5 minutes last month. I would prefer payments direct but running away with signature campaign funds must be low % chance if we look at what bit-x's outgoings overall must be.

[Quickseller]

I guess everyone would say this and only the bitcoin businesses can decide their budget but if the price stays this low i'd vote my number 1 want as higher rates.  Its not like bit-x isn't paying the highest rate vs other campaigns already afaik so understandable to keep pay the same.

The current rates that bit-x is paying are in line with what other pay per post campaigns have paid in the past, and in some cases are higher.

I would say with a good amount of certainty that marco will get a good number of additional participants once he offers payments directly to user's btc addresses

It doesnt make much difference to me where the deposit goes, the withdraw took 5 minutes last month. I would prefer payments direct but running away with signature campaign funds must be low % chance if we look at what bit-x's outgoings overall must be.

I think it is more privacy and convenience then the fear of them running away with their money (although many bitcoiners prefer to have 100% control over their funds 100% of the time, especially after what happened with gox). By having to provide their phone number as well as being asked to provide personal identifying information (although there are ways around actually giving this) people are giving up a lot of privacy, privacy that holds a lot of value. 

[Muhammed Zakir]

I think it is more privacy and convenience then the fear of them running away with their money (although many bitcoiners prefer to have 100% control over their funds 100% of the time, especially after what happened with gox).

I agree but if they change to weekly, most of them won't care about the payment to Bit-X.

By having to provide their phone number as well as being asked to provide personal identifying information (although there are ways around actually giving this) people are giving up a lot of privacy, privacy that holds a lot of value.  

I heard Google 2FA will be added soon.

Edit:

There is absolutely no need to provide any other personal identifying information than a phone number to signup and withdraw any signature earnings.

Forgot about this.

   -MZ

[marcotheminer]

I guess everyone would say this and only the bitcoin businesses can decide their budget but if the price stays this low i'd vote my number 1 want as higher rates.  Its not like bit-x isn't paying the highest rate vs other campaigns already afaik so understandable to keep pay the same.

The current rates that bit-x is paying are in line with what other pay per post campaigns have paid in the past, and in some cases are higher.

I would say with a good amount of certainty that marco will get a good number of additional participants once he offers payments directly to user's btc addresses

It doesnt make much difference to me where the deposit goes, the withdraw took 5 minutes last month. I would prefer payments direct but running away with signature campaign funds must be low % chance if we look at what bit-x's outgoings overall must be.

I think it is more privacy and convenience then the fear of them running away with their money (although many bitcoiners prefer to have 100% control over their funds 100% of the time, especially after what happened with gox). By having to provide their phone number as well as being asked to provide personal identifying information (although there are ways around actually giving this) people are giving up a lot of privacy, privacy that holds a lot of value. 

There is absolutely no need to provide any other personal identifying information than a phone number to signup and withdraw any signature earnings.