Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 07:25:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity?
yes - 74 (46.5%)
no - 85 (53.5%)
Total Voters: 159

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity?  (Read 102759 times)
iamnotback
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 265



View Profile
January 27, 2017, 06:55:31 AM
Last edit: January 27, 2017, 08:13:37 AM by iamnotback
 #701

I don't see anything about 2020 above.

Title of this thread, created by one of your schizophrenic socks:

Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020?

What Pyrrhic satisfaction do you gain from the fact that the thread asks a question about the likelihood of the coming global collapse overshooting into MadMax? A question is not a prediction.

We are definitely heading into a hornet's nest as Kissinger is advising Trump to shift policy towards Russia to drive a wedge between Russia and China and push China's economic rebalancing into a flash crash and destabilize SE Asia:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg17603443#msg17603443
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg17601898#msg17601898

This is coupled with Armstrong's short dollar vortex theme of international capital flow stampeding into the dollar which is well underway since before 2015.75 and is fomenting phase transition liftoff here in 2017 with ETA no later than 2018.

All I see if there is a missing word "after" in between 'peak' and '2015.75', which is everyone knows from reading me I often accidently elide intended words. Just go read a lot of my prose. For cripes sake, I had Tuberculosis for the past several years and delirium. I am allowed to miss type a word. It is clear from the context what I was intended.

Even if for the sake of argument I accede to your twist on Munchhausen syndrome (which I know full well is part of the New Age Hustle Pro Version),

You've have to come up some excuse as to why I have lab tests and medical documentation of my illness. How do you explain welts that would suddenly appear on the back of my skull after eating which was the autoimmune illness ostensibly brought on by the chronic, disseminated TB infection which had infected also my abdomen and intestine (which is very common in autopsies wherein there is an active TB infection of the lung which I am confirmed to have on an xray and which I have had for many years).

Lying is what you do. I have seen you do it so many times, I wonder how you still have any credibility.

Fuck man, you don't know me if you think I would cry about some non-existent illness. I survived something you can't even begin to fathom. Love to see you suffer TB for several years so you could walk in the shoes of another man who is actually very strong and very much a fighter.

I am not going to waste my time on you. You are scum of the earth as evident by your debating tactics in every exchange I have ever seen you engage (and not only with me).

you still have to explain why, well over a year after the date you predicted, there is no sign of interest rates having peaked.

Well either you are ignorant or you've lied again.

The US Fed had begun raising rates.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/bonds/us-30-year-bonds-the-party-is-over/  <--- from Dec. 6, 2016

You made an incorrect prediction (among many others) and have to own that.

Continue lying, but it only causes your credibility to continue to decline with anyone who takes to the time to actually review my record.

I already explained to you above, that the theme and predictions have not been incorrect. You choose to lie and debate disingenuously as you always do when you are incorrect.

Squirm all you like.

You are scum.  I do hope we meet face-to-face one day. You are loud mouth who can talk a bunch of shit from behind a keyboard. Let's see if you can do it to my face.
SuperVillain
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 27, 2017, 07:25:18 AM
 #702

As far as our money is concerned we always need anonymity.
Xester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 544



View Profile
January 27, 2017, 12:38:24 PM
 #703

As far as our money is concerned we always need anonymity.

Yes we need anonymity but in case of legal actions all bank account must be transparent in the face of the law. In our country there was a bank secrecy law that even the banks cannot expose the transactions made by their clients to the government authorities for legal purposes. Big syndicates find this as a haven for their profits since it is hidden by the banks in secrecy thus bank secrecy law must be conditional and will be deemed invalid for the pursuit of legality and truth.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!