Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 03:25:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: coin.trader / roberto exchange / btn.iulian@gmail.com SCAMMING for US$100  (Read 779 times)
brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 04:21:04 PM
 #1

What happened::
coin.trader saw my thread in Marketplace/Currency Exchange and PMed me a link to https://tawk.to/robertoexchange, where he has live chat. We chat, agree on price, I propose increments and he agrees. I send US$100 through Neteller to btn.iulian@gmail.com. He proceeded to stall, claiming sync errors with his wallets since he has been away for weeks. Hours pass. I request a refund. He says there will be too many fees since his account is in EUR, and there will be another conversion to USD. I offer my EUR Neteller which is a luxury of being Gold VIP. He claims a declined transaction. I request he send back the USD to the original email I transferred from. He says there will only be US$72 after fees (should be $92). I agree since at this stage I expect to get $0 back. Claims constant declining transactions. As expected, recieve $0. My fault for not clicking the 'trust' link. It showed up all zeros. When I clicked there were multiple negatives, no idea why it doesnt show underneath the username on each post to make it a little more obvious. No idea why such a negative user has an active thread, and isn't banned.

Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=972898

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1879063.0
Amount Scammed: US$100
Payment Method: Neteller btn.iulian@gmail.com
Proof of Payment: https://i.imgur.com/x5Miqy1.png
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:
https://i.imgur.com/K476TvW.png
PM
https://i.imgur.com/tsBt0kD.png
Declined Neteller

At this stage, I am fairly confident this is a scammer. If there is anything else I need to supply, please let me know. If coin.trader makes anyy transfers of BTC/ETH/US$ I will update accordingly. I recommend everybody avoid until this issue is resolved.
ibminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1826
Merit: 2793


Goonies never say die.


View Profile WWW
June 01, 2017, 05:27:21 PM
 #2

What happened::
coin.trader saw my thread in Marketplace/Currency Exchange and PMed me a link to https://tawk.to/robertoexchange, where he has live chat. We chat, agree on price, I propose increments and he agrees. I send US$100 through Neteller to btn.iulian@gmail.com. He proceeded to stall, claiming sync errors with his wallets since he has been away for weeks. Hours pass. I request a refund. He says there will be too many fees since his account is in EUR, and there will be another conversion to USD. I offer my EUR Neteller which is a luxury of being Gold VIP. He claims a declined transaction. I request he send back the USD to the original email I transferred from. He says there will only be US$72 after fees (should be $92). I agree since at this stage I expect to get $0 back. Claims constant declining transactions. As expected, recieve $0. My fault for not clicking the 'trust' link. It showed up all zeros. When I clicked there were multiple negatives, no idea why it doesnt show underneath the username on each post to make it a little more obvious. No idea why such a negative user has an active thread, and isn't banned.

Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=972898

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1879063.0
Amount Scammed: US$100
Payment Method: Neteller btn.iulian@gmail.com
Proof of Payment: https://i.imgur.com/x5Miqy1.png
PM/Chat Logs:
Additional Notes:
https://i.imgur.com/K476TvW.png
PM
https://i.imgur.com/tsBt0kD.png
Declined Neteller

At this stage, I am fairly confident this is a scammer. If there is anything else I need to supply, please let me know. If coin.trader makes anyy transfers of BTC/ETH/US$ I will update accordingly. I recommend everybody avoid until this issue is resolved.

I've left feedback for this user... there is an unpaid giveaway where excuses are being made and at least 2 others saying he has not sent the BTC.
"Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor."
A reputable escrow would have been a good choice here.

brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 05:37:45 PM
 #3

I've left feedback for this user... there is an unpaid giveaway where excuses are being made and at least 2 others saying he has not sent the BTC.
"Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor."
A reputable escrow would have been a good choice here.
Agreed, full responsibility here. I took for granted the trust under the username on posts. I assumed 0/0/0 meant no negative feedback. I'm not sure how it works, but I guess I have to click the trust link on every single person. I agree with using an escrow, but I feel using an escrow with scammers only enables their further scamming and keeps them functioning on bitcointalk, when what we need is them disabled from plaguing this site.
ibminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1826
Merit: 2793


Goonies never say die.


View Profile WWW
June 01, 2017, 05:44:07 PM
 #4

I've left feedback for this user... there is an unpaid giveaway where excuses are being made and at least 2 others saying he has not sent the BTC.
"Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor."
A reputable escrow would have been a good choice here.
Agreed, full responsibility here. I took for granted the trust under the username on posts. I assumed 0/0/0 meant no negative feedback. I'm not sure how it works, but I guess I have to click the trust link on every single person. I agree with using an escrow, but I feel using an escrow with scammers only enables their further scamming and keeps them functioning on bitcointalk, when what we need is them disabled from plaguing this site.

The trust system is also not moderated, but clicking on the trust link of someone whether is says 0/0/0 or not is usually a good idea before trading. Only members in the "DefaultTrust" (DT) network can impact that 0/0/0 score (unless you have customized your own trust list). By default, accounts will start off trusting only the DefaultTrust network. Feedback from non-DT accounts will show up under "untrusted" feedback on the users trust page, but may not be as noticeable because it does not change the 0/0/0. Untrusted feedback is a lot of times unreliable and anyone can leave feedback in this area saying whatever they want.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1066857.0

Also, how is using an escrow with a scammer enabling their scamming?  

brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 01, 2017, 05:54:39 PM
 #5

Thanks for the info. Essential reading really.
Also, how is using an escrow with a scammer enabling their scamming? 
It's a personal belief. If they trade for whatever reason and scam when the opportunity presents, they have two reasons to stay. If we take away the frequent successful trades, it can make it not worth their time to stick around purely to scam.

Rephrased, if the site is more functional for a person, a person is more likely to hang around. The purpose of this thread isn't to solve problems though, I am new and can only pretend to know the ins and outs of this forum. Case in point, the fact that this thread exists.
ibminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1826
Merit: 2793


Goonies never say die.


View Profile WWW
June 01, 2017, 06:28:59 PM
 #6

It's a personal belief. If they trade for whatever reason and scam when the opportunity presents, they have two reasons to stay. If we take away the frequent successful trades, it can make it not worth their time to stick around purely to scam.

Rephrased, if the site is more functional for a person, a person is more likely to hang around. The purpose of this thread isn't to solve problems though, I am new and can only pretend to know the ins and outs of this forum. Case in point, the fact that this thread exists.


There isn't really a great way on this forum to know someone is a scammer if they are here doing successful trades so I'm not sure how they could be identified before they decide to scam. Also keep in mind that "successful trades" can be faked by other accounts owned by the same person (alts), and they can leave as much "untrusted" feedback on themselves as they want, making it look like they are trading with other "users" when they really are not.

Members with "green" trust on their trusted 0/0/0 score are usually the ones with actual proven trades because they have been given positive feedback by other DT members, whom are generally trusted by most of the community, but my belief is even green users should also always be looked at before trading. You should always look at the user who is leaving them feedback as well to ensure it's not just random newbies/alts or other scammers themselves posting feedback for whatever reason.

Once a scammer's account has been marked "red" by a DT member, their accounts usually become pretty worthless to them because nobody (except maybe other scammers) are going to want to trade with them, and they cannot easily sell their account or use them in most signature campaigns.

The escrow's job is to act as a trusted middle man between the trade to prevent the opportunity to scam. If an escrow was always used, there should be minimal opportunity to scam. There is a chance the escrow turns into a scammer themselves, but this is much more unlikely, and rare, especially if you are using a reputable escrow that has handled a lot of successful trades with large amounts and has been around a long time.

The admins could probably do more to proactively fight scammers but I believe they have deemed it as just too much overhead to monitor and really just put the burden on the community members themselves to be vigilant.

brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 12:23:20 AM
 #7

There isn't really a great way on this forum to know someone is a scammer if they are here doing successful trades so I'm not sure how they could be identified before they decide to scam. Also keep in mind that "successful trades" can be faked by other accounts owned by the same person (alts), and they can leave as much "untrusted" feedback on themselves as they want, making it look like they are trading with other "users" when they really are not.

Members with "green" trust on their trusted 0/0/0 score are usually the ones with actual proven trades because they have been given positive feedback by other DT members, whom are generally trusted by most of the community, but my belief is even green users should also always be looked at before trading. You should always look at the user who is leaving them feedback as well to ensure it's not just random newbies/alts or other scammers themselves posting feedback for whatever reason.

Once a scammer's account has been marked "red" by a DT member, their accounts usually become pretty worthless to them because nobody (except maybe other scammers) are going to want to trade with them, and they cannot easily sell their account or use them in most signature campaigns.

The escrow's job is to act as a trusted middle man between the trade to prevent the opportunity to scam. If an escrow was always used, there should be minimal opportunity to scam. There is a chance the escrow turns into a scammer themselves, but this is much more unlikely, and rare, especially if you are using a reputable escrow that has handled a lot of successful trades with large amounts and has been around a long time.

The admins could probably do more to proactively fight scammers but I believe they have deemed it as just too much overhead to monitor and really just put the burden on the community members themselves to be vigilant.

Thanks for the info. I've been on multiple forums for various trading in my life. By a wide margin, this website has the biggest number of scammers, unless they are a small group with multiple accounts. I understand scammers will always be present, but with such a high % of scammers I assume something else is going on to allow them to flourish. It may also just be the anonymous nature of crypto.

I PMed OgNasty last night, and he said he doesnt use Skype, claimed 98% of users from Bitcointalk who use Skype are scammers. Reflecting, this is probably fairly accurate. I think I will listen to his advice and stick to PMs only despite the 6 minute wait between PMs and maximum 5/hour. And obviously use an escrow every time.

Mostly I'm angry at myself for contributing to the problem by falling for the scam and being the reason scammers are here Sad

Thanks again for the guidance, much appreciated.
Yuuto
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501



View Profile
June 02, 2017, 12:36:25 AM
 #8

Scams are extremely common on this forum because bitcoin is anonymous as you said and also reversible. People on this forum are only identified as a single username and nothing else. Nobody knows the full name mmes of anyone except for a few members.

I would disagree on the 98% scam rate but people who insist on chatting on Skype whilst having zero reputation are probably scammers. There are a lot of legit bitcoiners that offer Skype as an alternative form of communication.
brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2017, 01:17:55 AM
 #9

Name: Roberto Breiva
E-mail: roberto.breiva@gmail.com
aadje93
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2017, 04:44:21 PM
 #10

Name: Roberto Breiva
E-mail: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

I got a pm from a different user using the same mail Huh

I agree on this... how we proceed

skrill: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

We can do it on parts or you first. Lets do it fast if you need. Also we can split in more transaction but you being a newbie i am reallly sorry but you must go first

coin.trader
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 05, 2017, 08:35:56 AM
 #11

First of all, that is not my neteller account.

He sent to my roberto.breiva@gmail.com that is my neteller account. I ask the OP to show the source of neteller funds. My account was blocked after I received the funds.

LWF ║█║ THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED LOGISTICS PLATFORM IN THE WORLD ║█║ LWF
ANN THREAD▬▬▬║PRE-SALE STARTS IN OCTOBER 23║▬▬▬WHITEPAPER
TWITTERSLACK ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ TELEGRAMREDDIT
brdx86 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2017, 09:05:09 AM
 #12

First of all, that is not my neteller account.

He sent to my roberto.breiva@gmail.com that is my neteller account. I ask the OP to show the source of neteller funds. My account was blocked after I received the funds.

Hold up, so did I send to roberto.breiva@gmail.com and then your neteller got blocked?

Or did I send to btn.iulian@gmail.com neteller which then got blocked?

Because if btn.iulian isn't yours, you should have no idea if it was blocked or not. And it should have been blocked, over two days I made many phone calls to Neteller trying to sort this out. Hardly surprising they would block btn.iulian as a precaution. Which Neteller is blocked coin.trader?

Here is the Neteller transaction:
https://i.imgur.com/vEs4cwy.png

Here is a screenshot you sent me in tawk.to/robertoexchange where you showed me the refund mentioned in OP was declining:
https://i.imgur.com/FK14v4B.png

Name: Roberto Breiva
E-mail: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

I got a pm from a different user using the same mail Huh

I agree on this... how we proceed

skrill: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

We can do it on parts or you first. Lets do it fast if you need. Also we can split in more transaction but you being a newbie i am reallly sorry but you must go first

Good find. His active thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1940623.20) has coin.trader posting too. I wonder why Furwin would give somebody elses neteller and free money. Any explanation coin.trader?
U2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 503


I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...


View Profile
June 06, 2017, 06:05:33 PM
 #13

Any explanation coin.trader?

They're obviously alts but he wasn't posting it in public because he didn't want all of his accounts to have negative trust. Looks like that backfired.

While we're on it, what about the giveaway thread you started coin.trader? What was the point of that?
hermanhs09
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 06, 2017, 07:23:13 PM
 #14

He obviously has not paid the giveaway nor is he planning on paying it anytime soon.

And unless bipolarbob comes around, that thread is dead and not getting revived.

Why would he do it? For fun I guess to see how many people will fall into his trap.
aTriz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 683


Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big


View Profile
June 06, 2017, 07:30:24 PM
 #15

Name: Roberto Breiva
E-mail: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

I got a pm from a different user using the same mail Huh

I agree on this... how we proceed

skrill: roberto.breiva@gmail.com

We can do it on parts or you first. Lets do it fast if you need. Also we can split in more transaction but you being a newbie i am reallly sorry but you must go first

If this is true then I think it is obvious that Furwin is an alt of coin.trader and deserves to get a negative trust from DT as well. OP can you please post some of the screenshots of him sending this message to you?

A lot of people has entered the coin.tradrr promised giveaway. He has promised to reveal the winners 3 days ago and still hasn't streamed anything anywhere. Should be clear to anyone that he's not planning on paying either.

Did anyone else reading this post get scammed by coin.trader? Don't be afraid to come forward with information

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!