Lauda -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)

[johnscoin]

I would like to report one massive trust abuser: Lauda

He abused the trust system to spam lies against me.

Evidence： https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=129761

If we look at the bright side, it's an honor for me, because he/they used same lies to attack Satoshi and Gavin.

Many people have been trolled by this guy so far. I don't think the trust mechanism was designed for such liars/trolls like Lauda.

PS: Lauda was reported to be a scammer with several alts by many users, such as "elianite", "defcon23", "mriulian", and so on. The only reason this liar Lauda has not banned because he voluntarily spammed lies that fit the iterative the webmaster "Theymos" liked. It is also extremely likely that his account is compromised since his writing style changed dramatically since he started to slander Bitcoiners like crazy.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from this liar.

[Lauda]

Theymos defamed Bitmain by spreading the lies about "Asicboost".
Theymos defamed the UAHF by implying it's not Bitcoin, while being okay with the UASF, which has much less support than UAHF.
Theymos defamed the UAHF as "controlled by a single company". Yet he had nothing to support this defamation. UAHF is open-source, and unlike UASF there will be no dictator in UAHF.
-snip-
Mr. Theymos, censor to fork your UASF. I'll stick with Bitcoin, thank you very much. I kinda doubt that you'are actually going to stick by what you say here, but if you do, it only seems like good news.

Every time this user comes online to post, they spread lies and complain about "censorship", "defamation" and other nonsense . It is also very likely that this account is compromised.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from said user.

Did I state something that was not correct?

Every time this user comes online to post,

Boycott the scary censorship here.
Do you like theymos and the censorship here, reddit, bitcoinorg and GitHub?
It's immoral for Theymos to spam lies to attack Bitcoiners. He deserves a ban.
Poll: Has Theymos been hacked or hijacked?

Whilst I disagree with theymos on many accounts, my rating properly describes your actions.
Waiting for QS with popcorn.

[Nagadota]

Every time this user comes online to post, they spread lies and complain about "censorship", "defamation" and other nonsense . It is also very likely that this account is compromised.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from said user.

Did I state something that was not correct?

No.  However, I consider it far more important to provide a reference for the second part than the first, as that's something that should require an explanation.

The OP has posted in Chinese recently, and used to post in it before the recent change in attitude.  If the OP really wants to prove that his account was not compromised he could sign from the address 1Ed7y6jGzXgA42Vsbvd9oB7Pzt5SsJQi7e, but I consider it fairly unlikely that the account was compromised.

What's more likely is that the OP was an alt account of someone who has recently been opposed to Lauda, and has now begun to argue using that account as well.  Especially since 99.9% of people who post in Games and Rounds are alt accounts.

[Lauda]

No.  However, I consider it far more important to provide a reference for the second part than the first, as that's something that should require an explanation.

You mean, my personal opinion, that it's likely compromised? I could remove it, but it's just that, a personal opinion (+ emphasis on the wording "highly likely"). I always wonder why there are *users* who basically do not participate in the community at all, who just come here to complain about a community in which they do not participate in.

What's more likely is that the OP was an alt account of someone who has recently been opposed to Lauda, and has now begun to argue using that account as well.  Especially since 99.9% of people who post in Games and Rounds are alt accounts.

That's possible. Do you have a reference for that?

[actmyname]

The OP has posted in Chinese recently, and used to post in it before the recent change in attitude.  If the OP really wants to prove that his account was not compromised he could sign from the address 1Ed7y6jGzXgA42Vsbvd9oB7Pzt5SsJQi7e, but I consider it fairly unlikely that the account was compromised.

Are you sure? Because the thing is, the entire style of writing changed from crappy English to semi-proper sentences, to proper sentences. Look in the account's history and you'll see what I mean. Also, I wouldn't say that the 1Ed7y address is a good candidate for full verification of the account since that was posted after the change to half-coherency.

This is an older dogecoin address: D8iAawN2bVKbemM8CdmpjkysDJtEdquWFV from 2013.
I find it unlikely that, in order to defame Lauda and argue with them, the account would start using proper grammar as opposed to their previous history. It would make for less suspicion to carry on the same style of writing and thus I would be more inclined to state that the account was compromised at some point especially considering its age.

[Pearls Before Swine]

If it's an honor for you, STFU.

How's some Chinese guy going to legitimately complain about censorship and fascism?   How is any member-level member got enough experience here to really complain about anything at all?  I suspect an alt account at the very least (no crime there) or a hacked one at worst, as lauda alluded to.  I can't stand whiners.