Bitcoin Forum
November 21, 2017, 08:31:05 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lauda -> Proven to Abuse Trust (Corrupt + Poisonous)  (Read 411 times)
johnscoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
June 24, 2017, 09:39:54 AM
 #1

I would like to report one massive trust abuser: Lauda

He abused the trust system to spam lies against me.

Evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=129761

If we look at the bright side, it's an honor for me, because he/they used same lies to attack Satoshi and Gavin.

Many people have been trolled by this guy so far. I don't think the trust mechanism was designed for such liars/trolls like Lauda.

PS: Lauda was reported to be a scammer with several alts by many users, such as "elianite", "defcon23", "mriulian", and so on. The only reason this liar Lauda has not banned because he voluntarily spammed lies that fit the iterative the webmaster "Theymos" liked. It is also extremely likely that his account is compromised since his writing style changed dramatically since he started to slander Bitcoiners like crazy.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from this liar.
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
1511253065
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511253065

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511253065
Reply with quote  #2

1511253065
Report to moderator
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666


GUNBOT Licenses -15% with ref. code 'GrumpyKitty'


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2017, 10:00:30 AM
 #2

Theymos defamed Bitmain by spreading the lies about "Asicboost".
Theymos defamed the UAHF by implying it's not Bitcoin, while being okay with the UASF, which has much less support than UAHF.
Theymos defamed the UAHF as "controlled by a single company". Yet he had nothing to support this defamation. UAHF is open-source, and unlike UASF there will be no dictator in UAHF.
-snip-
Mr. Theymos, censor to fork your UASF. I'll stick with Bitcoin, thank you very much. I kinda doubt that you'are actually going to stick by what you say here, but if you do, it only seems like good news.

Quote
Every time this user comes online to post, they spread lies and complain about "censorship", "defamation" and other nonsense . It is also very likely that this account is compromised.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from said user.
Did I state something that was not correct? Lips sealed

Quote
Every time this user comes online to post,
Boycott the scary censorship here.
Do you like theymos and the censorship here, reddit, bitcoinorg and GitHub?
It's immoral for Theymos to spam lies to attack Bitcoiners. He deserves a ban.
Poll: Has Theymos been hacked or hijacked?

Whilst I disagree with theymos on many accounts, my rating properly describes your actions.

Waiting for QS with popcorn. Roll Eyes


▄██████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████████
█████████████████
███████████████
████████████████
████████████████
█████████████████
███████████████████
████████████████████
█████████████████████
▀████████████████████
Bazista®
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██

██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
|||
Nagadota
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


ClaimWithMe - the most paying faucet of all times!


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2017, 11:00:43 AM
 #3


Quote from: Lauda
Quote
Every time this user comes online to post, they spread lies and complain about "censorship", "defamation" and other nonsense . It is also very likely that this account is compromised.
I wouldn't trust anything coming from said user.
Did I state something that was not correct? Lips sealed
No.  However, I consider it far more important to provide a reference for the second part than the first, as that's something that should require an explanation.

The OP has posted in Chinese recently, and used to post in it before the recent change in attitude.  If the OP really wants to prove that his account was not compromised he could sign from the address 1Ed7y6jGzXgA42Vsbvd9oB7Pzt5SsJQi7e, but I consider it fairly unlikely that the account was compromised.

What's more likely is that the OP was an alt account of someone who has recently been opposed to Lauda, and has now begun to argue using that account as well.  Especially since 99.9% of people who post in Games and Rounds are alt accounts.

Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666


GUNBOT Licenses -15% with ref. code 'GrumpyKitty'


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2017, 11:04:31 AM
 #4

No.  However, I consider it far more important to provide a reference for the second part than the first, as that's something that should require an explanation.
You mean, my personal opinion, that it's likely compromised? I could remove it, but it's just that, a personal opinion (+ emphasis on the wording "highly likely"). I always wonder why there are *users* who basically do not participate in the community at all, who just come here to complain about a community in which they do not participate in.

What's more likely is that the OP was an alt account of someone who has recently been opposed to Lauda, and has now begun to argue using that account as well.  Especially since 99.9% of people who post in Games and Rounds are alt accounts.
That's possible. Do you have a reference for that? Tongue


▄██████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████████
█████████████████
███████████████
████████████████
████████████████
█████████████████
███████████████████
████████████████████
█████████████████████
▀████████████████████
Bazista®
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██

██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
██ █  ██ ██
██   ██  ██
██  ██   ██
██ ██  █ ██
|||
actmyname
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882

trustless trust


View Profile
June 24, 2017, 03:56:50 PM
 #5

The OP has posted in Chinese recently, and used to post in it before the recent change in attitude.  If the OP really wants to prove that his account was not compromised he could sign from the address 1Ed7y6jGzXgA42Vsbvd9oB7Pzt5SsJQi7e, but I consider it fairly unlikely that the account was compromised.
Are you sure? Because the thing is, the entire style of writing changed from crappy English to semi-proper sentences, to proper sentences. Look in the account's history and you'll see what I mean. Also, I wouldn't say that the 1Ed7y address is a good candidate for full verification of the account since that was posted after the change to half-coherency.

This is an older dogecoin address: D8iAawN2bVKbemM8CdmpjkysDJtEdquWFV from 2013.


I find it unlikely that, in order to defame Lauda and argue with them, the account would start using proper grammar as opposed to their previous history. It would make for less suspicion to carry on the same style of writing and thus I would be more inclined to state that the account was compromised at some point especially considering its age.

Known alts of actmyname (unofficial list by members with -2 trust or more): DarkStar_, Lauda, Lutpin, The Pharmacist, satoshi, theymos, thermos, the Monopoly man, Charlie Sheen, Shaquille O'Neal/s
Pearls Before Swine
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
June 24, 2017, 04:15:56 PM
 #6

If it's an honor for you, STFU.

How's some Chinese guy going to legitimately complain about censorship and fascism?   How is any member-level member got enough experience here to really complain about anything at all?  I suspect an alt account at the very least (no crime there) or a hacked one at worst, as lauda alluded to.  I can't stand whiners.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!