What kind of ico project do you think is meaningless?

[Chuokie]

When the project is extended and will not tell the reasons and just keep on going, not answering members question but making the rules harder and adding more regulations, if they didn't hit the soft cap then they must inform their team at least people could understand them since that thing happens a lot and will understand the situation, keeping silent will lead them to misunderstanding too.

[JustBetweenUs]

I would not invest into the following kind of ico projects

1. Me too types
2. The one which doesnt integrate the token into the project
3. The one that doesnt really solve any problem

Regarding the 3rd point, I think that every project believes they solve a problem. The question is rather, is the problem they want to solve something that the community feels it is a problem that is worth to be solved in terms of investing resources. Look at Raiden and Quantstamp, they solved real problems but still are not going anywhere...

[yrsat]

A crypto project will fail if they do not have an idea of what they want to do and how to implement their ideas. Often they simply copy ideas from other projects.
4) even it's a copy of someone else's project.

[blazsqd]

when the project doesn't respect the member. the point is that the dev doesn't respect the member. the rules also become so hard to follow. so there is no feedback from each other.

[success007]

ICOs are going to continue being a part of cryptocurrency and blockchains. We simply cannot overlook the good that they have done. From giving birth to innovative technologies. Their contribution simply cannot be understated. What we can all do is act more responsibly and do our own research. Study the white papers, interview the team involved with the specific projects that are up for ICOs and then invest your money.