Why shouldn't there be a constitution? The constitution just must be writen by citizens as it has been done in Iceland.
And you talk about a big syndicate aiming at their own interests, but that would be only if you manage to find a large enough amount of people who share the same interests.
What you mean here is that majority would rull over minority right?
The constitution may not reflect the wishes of the citizens during a period of time (for an example: We created it today with majority's agreement, but in 30 years, most people don't agree with this anymore), so will the communists citizens accept to keep following it? It's contradictory with the "communist direct democracy" idea...
You're right. The constitution might guarantee certain rights and we can change the idea of majority by saying for example laws can pass only if 60% of the population agrees but eventually, you reach a point where you say "hey, 80% of us agree on this so let's do this". But I don't see any way to have a system where a group manages itself without deciding that majority rules minority. It's teh very base of group interactions. Unless you see something else possible?
Majority rules almost everything. They can't, for an example, come to my house and send me out because it's going to become a factory, state's building or something like this. In a communist (even the perfect one) it could happen, and I wouldn't have who to appeal.
Communists don't respect the individual, because everything that matters for them is the whole collective. If most people want, that is what must be done, even if it involves taking most profits/production, properties from the citizens and forcing them to work where they don't want.
Yes, changes are needed, 5 years is too much to accept quietly, especially if the political said one thing during the campaign and did the opposite or nothing after elected. I just don't think changes should be so extreme...
Well that's understandable cause that would be some crazy changes. I don't see any mild solution but if you do feel free to tell
Replacing the represetants and pressing them to make their job correctly. If it doesn't work in a country, the problem aren't exclusively the politicians, but the people in general...
I really think people would change their state of mind if they knew they had actual power. Today people don't give a shit because they know politicians are just lying and nothing can be done.
If you tell them "ok now you make the laws and the constitution, no more representants you're going to decide yourself" they will be scared of course, but also happy to have control over their own destiny. And I think they'll really get more and more involved in politics.
I think power isn't for anyone... Everyone changes their state of mind with power, but some for the worse.
Monarchy, democracy, tyranny, oligarchy, communism... Everything could work, depending the people involved on these systems. In the end the problem are the people and not the systems themselves... That is why there are always positive examples about everything involving nordic countries, but when you apply the nordic politics in third world countries there isn't any guarantee they will work too, because the people.