This is the water cooled miner running at 325MHz now - can somebody point me on where to see if a still have potential to go higher?
What are the "rejected", what the "discarded" shares? Where do I see the hardware error rate?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FAcp7saK.png&t=665&c=d-S-arVEAtASFA)
That's the air cooled miner next to it:
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGI9CIZl.png&t=665&c=AVv9k8BW1Rf6Xg)
Here are the pool stats - I don't really understand why the water cooled miner is not faster by the number the frquency is higher (~15%)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmisdTDp.png&t=665&c=69eUdvSOfcLOKA)
This might have something to do with the way your miner/controller talks to the boards and how it handles jobs given to chips and cooling is needed but is not that important as firmware and controller kernel design. It's brain and not muscle game.
However nice effort with aluminum blocks milling, but they suffer from same problems solar thermal panels have. Expensive, heavy and not that efficient. This technology is now obsolete with roll-bond technology available. We talk top-solutions, not mainstream which is still low efficiently-dominated on the market.