Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:22:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Supercomputers Golem vs. SONM vs. IEXEC - Who will win the race?  (Read 431 times)
slaman29
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1215


Livecasino, 20% cashback, no fuss payouts.


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 04:18:05 PM
 #21

I held a quite decent bag of SONM but after doing some thorough research and comparisons I sold all and put it on a safe bet for the long run, i.e. iExec / RLC.

My reason?
Decentralized computing / super-computing / grid-computing is a buzzword any of them 3 companies (RLC, GNT, SONM) is using. However this is some heavy shit technology wise and requires a lot of experience. It's not like you can just make an ICO with that theme and expect to have something decently working after a few months. So why iExec / RLC? Because they (their team) has been working on this field for several years now (even several decades). It consists of industry-proven researchers who hold Ph.D.s in this area and contribute to the top-notch research papers in the field. The iExec / RLC platform uses an open-source software the team has been developing on over the last 16 years.. This platform is already being used in industry projects (e.g. Larage Hadron Collider - CERN). They have delivered their V1 on time and are currently working on V2 which is scheduled for coming May. They have in fact been talking with IBM and were invited to the IBM Think Days 19-22 March 2018 where they'll presenet about Cloud Security.

Current Status:
So why is it that iExec / RLC who is obviously miles ahead of GNT and SONM has a lower market cap than those two? Simple. It's marketing. At the moment they do not focus on marketing, however they stated that having outrolled V2 in a few months, they'll focus on tier-one partnerships and marketing which will be a lot easier if you have a solid working version of your product not just hype and a whitepaper. The price of iExec / RLC is far too low at the moment, which IMO is the best time to get in. Note however, that as soon as V2 is online and the marketing machinery starts, this project will take off.

Hey, don't forget the super darkhorse in the mix there, Elastic (XEL) which moves more or less the same line of decentralized supercomputing power with the difference that it is a voluntary project that never ran an ICO. I'm guilty of having bought it when it was probably way overvalued at the time, almost a year ago, but their slow and steady progress towards the product shouldn't be overlooked.

It didn't skyrocket in price, it's been very quiet but they're looking for meaningful collaborations and looks really much like the sleeping giant most people claim their coin to be.

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
... LIVECASINO.io    Play Live Games with up to 20% cashback!...██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
pey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 251


Free Crypto in Stake.com Telegram t.me/StakeCasino


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 04:54:37 PM
 #22

This comparison talks, sonm is really one of the best investments currently, I am sure that big investors hold it. Both project and team of sonm are far ahead

hdclover
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 501


www.bitcoin.org


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 06:43:11 PM
 #23

I held a quite decent bag of SONM but after doing some thorough research and comparisons I sold all and put it on a safe bet for the long run, i.e. iExec / RLC.

My reason?
Decentralized computing / super-computing / grid-computing is a buzzword any of them 3 companies (RLC, GNT, SONM) is using. However this is some heavy shit technology wise and requires a lot of experience. It's not like you can just make an ICO with that theme and expect to have something decently working after a few months. So why iExec / RLC? Because they (their team) has been working on this field for several years now (even several decades). It consists of industry-proven researchers who hold Ph.D.s in this area and contribute to the top-notch research papers in the field. The iExec / RLC platform uses an open-source software the team has been developing on over the last 16 years.. This platform is already being used in industry projects (e.g. Larage Hadron Collider - CERN). They have delivered their V1 on time and are currently working on V2 which is scheduled for coming May. They have in fact been talking with IBM and were invited to the IBM Think Days 19-22 March 2018 where they'll presenet about Cloud Security.

Current Status:
So why is it that iExec / RLC who is obviously miles ahead of GNT and SONM has a lower market cap than those two? Simple. It's marketing. At the moment they do not focus on marketing, however they stated that having outrolled V2 in a few months, they'll focus on tier-one partnerships and marketing which will be a lot easier if you have a solid working version of your product not just hype and a whitepaper. The price of iExec / RLC is far too low at the moment, which IMO is the best time to get in. Note however, that as soon as V2 is online and the marketing machinery starts, this project will take off.

Hey, don't forget the super darkhorse in the mix there, Elastic (XEL) which moves more or less the same line of decentralized supercomputing power with the difference that it is a voluntary project that never ran an ICO. I'm guilty of having bought it when it was probably way overvalued at the time, almost a year ago, but their slow and steady progress towards the product shouldn't be overlooked.

It didn't skyrocket in price, it's been very quiet but they're looking for meaningful collaborations and looks really much like the sleeping giant most people claim their coin to be.
Elastic is also a compitator here but there team is very weak in marketing and communicating. Elastic was in the top 100 coins in the last year but now it is pushed way beyond 200 mark. SONM is also same like Elastos but their product is certainly better than golem in many aspects atleast on paper.

Blah blah
waaat?
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 104


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 06:52:33 PM
 #24

This comparison talks, sonm is really one of the best investments currently, I am sure that big investors hold it. Both project and team of sonm are far ahead
Ye, agreed. Sonm team work hard. They have working beta. They have marketing plan and knows how will be monetize services for all participants in mainnet: miners, users, nodes. iExec plan to give v.2 as I hear. But RLC today lagging behind more and more
thompshma
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 21, 2018, 08:24:39 PM
 #25

I think quantum computation will be a thing before any of these projects resolves fog computing.

That being said I think SONM has the most potential.
Harsh_Patel
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 10

Algo Trader


View Profile
May 17, 2018, 11:19:34 AM
 #26

Does anyone here have SONM whitepaper? Apparently they took it down and created Documentation. I need whitepaper. If someone have it offline on their device and could share it with me, It will be wonderful. I need it badly for my research.

I am sorry for my wrong doings.

▰▰▰▰▰▰▰ Hindi Translation Delivery in 5 days ▰▰▰▰▰▰▰
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!