I received a negative tag, how bad is it?

[LoyceV]

I remember my first Untrusted negative feedback. It happens, it means nothing and you'll get used to it.
You may want to read LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I remember my first Untrusted negative feedback. It happens, it means nothing and you'll get used to it.
You may want to read LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

I think I remember panicking when I got my first one too. We seem to get more if we are actively leaving negative trust regularly. Revenge reds you could say. I don’t tend to get them any more as I’m not an active scam buster. Somebody like JollyGood or nutildah probably get a lot of them.

Like others have said though, negative trusts from non-DT members mean very little and not to be concerned about.

[examplens]

Like others have said though, negative trusts from non-DT members mean very little and not to be concerned about.

In some specific cases, a correct negative tag may also appear from no DT member, although this escalates very quickly.
Personally, I always check the red tag if necessary, unless it's from a few members that I've made sure don't give biased red tags.

[Majestic-milf]

The future of Satofan44's account can be viewed with irony: he scatters his red tags all over the forum and eventually finds himself alone. Ultimately, no one on the forum wants to argue with him, not because they're afraid of him, but because everyone starts ignoring him.
OP, do the same; hit the "ignore" button.
The tags of some users who can't contain their aggression lose their significance. Satofan44 is talking to himself because his reputation has "grown" so much that his tags are no longer taken seriously.

It's like you took the words out of my mouth! Seriously, I don't get his deal though. So basically, do not have a contrary opinion to his else you'd be given a tag? What happened to putting those who don't agree with you on ignore since they don't share the same level of "knowledge" that Satofan posseses.
 I think op raised the issue cause he would not want anything that would ruin his account or image so it's a valid question and now he'd rest easy knowing that the likes of Satofan aren't what one should give too much thought to.

[Shishir99]

He is just a piece of shit. You have nothing to worry about. Just fuck his feedback and move on. He is an attention seeker. He has some technical knowledge, which is why he is getting merits for his posts. He is doing it intentionally to get some attention, and one day, he will come to the reputation board, delete all the feedback, and say he didn't get how it worked. Now he understands everything, and everyone should reconsider removing him from their exclusion list. He is doing some bullshit that usually retards do. Once again, just move on and forget about his worthless feedback.

[KingsDen]

The future of Satofan44's account can be viewed with irony: he scatters his red tags all over the forum and eventually finds himself alone. Ultimately, no one on the forum wants to argue with him, not because they're afraid of him, but because everyone starts ignoring him.
OP, do the same; hit the "ignore" button.
The tags of some users who can't contain their aggression lose their significance. Satofan44 is talking to himself because his reputation has "grown" so much that his tags are no longer taken seriously.

I am saddened when I remember how Satofan44 is wrongly using the trust system. TBH, Satofan44 is a very good poster. His merit/activity ratio is very cool, signaling a dedicated user of the forum. His merit distribution is also cool. If not for the wrong use of the trust system, he should be among the newbies that had a decent technical knowledge of the forum - the likes of PowerGlove, nonce etc.

There was actually a thread that was supposed to make him start using the trust system the right way, but it didn't happen. I wonder why the firm believe in the wrong thing. I wish to know his reasons for insisting...

[logfiles]

There was actually a thread that was supposed to make him start using the trust system the right way, but it didn't happen. I wonder why the firm believe in the wrong thing. I wish to know his reasons for insisting...

Unfortunately, we are all kinds of people in this forum with all kinds of characters. Sometimes even when you try to correct someone or point out their mistakes, it simply won't work because of perhaps a high ego. So you have these members who just keep doing something over and over again despite getting advised several times

Having a big ego isn't something good long term, and it eventually leads to one's downfall, no matter how good they were in other aspects. Remember the downfall of brilliant members like Nullius or symmetick?

[Pablo-wood]

In some specific cases, a correct negative tag may also appear from no DT member, although this escalates very quickly.
Personally, I always check the red tag if necessary, unless it's from a few members that I've made sure don't give biased red tags.

Yeah I have noticed how accurate tags given by non-DT users escalate and most times attracts  more tags from DT users to concretise the accusations. it often catches the attention of DT users who then review the case themselves.

On the other hand, biased or low-effort tags from non-DT users usually get ignored or even countered by DT users. I take red tags seriously when DT-members co-tags the same account tagged by a non-DT user.

[mrust_mobile]

Satofan’s trust ratings are not important as he doesn’t belong in dt. He has been misusing the trust system for a while and this is only another example. If he keeps doing shit like this he will dig himself a reputation grave which he won’t be able to come back. At this point though, he is very close to have an irreparable reputation just because of his trust system misusage. It is sad because he knows a lot about bitcoin but he is extremely stupid when it comes to trust ratings. Reminds me of nullius in this regard. He too had the same pattern. Vast cryptography knowledge, shitty decision making when handing trust ratings. In the end he had to leave the forum with many red tags and that’s future of satofan if he follows the same road to the end.