whether a bounty hunter can help increase trading volume?

[PuertoLibre]

it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume

I don't agree with you. Bounty hunters also participate in every trade with buying and selling the coin. They mainly sell for the low profit but I can't blame bounty hunter for their behaviour. They are paid for a job and they deserve to get payment with selling the coin for cash.

[huhhuh18]

Oh yeah, sure! Bounty hunters contribute a greater part to the growth and development of many coins. In fact, when you examine the contracts of many ETH-based tokens, you'll find that the number of token holders only increase after bounty payments, and that's a major contributor to decentralization. Moreover, there are bounty hunters who're also traders and investors and as such the better they see a coin to be, the more they invest or trade into it helping build/develop that particular coin.

[smyslov]

most bounty hunters participate in promoting large projects managed by a company that wants to successfully run the project to be developed, project managers can provide potential coins such as bitcoin and ethereum to bounty hunters who participate to promote it. Does the weekly or monthly payment that a manager can provide can encourage growth in market price movements?
because surely some of them always trade every week or monthly after being paid because they need money for their needs.
Is this one of the factors that can increase trading volume other than large investors who can influence market prices?

Unfortunately, we seldom saw ICO paying their bounty with a tradeable coin in the market like Bitcoin, Ethereum, bounty hunters will prefer these options when they see one, ICO now are more preferred to pay with their own token, keeping tradeable they accumulate, because it's double for them.

[DeepChipolino]

it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume

That is, as "will not affect"?
If several bounty hunters trade their assets, they increase the volume of trade. This is especially true for illiquid assets. Perhaps assets with trading volumes of several thousand dollars are being created by bounty hunters. Investors do not trade, hardly anyone else is interested in illiquid assets.

[smf1943]

BS IMO

[dat.ho12492]

it depends on the action bounty hunter, what they do when they get paid for they work, whether they trade or they sell it at once, in my opinion the bounty hunters will not affect the increase in volume

I don't agree with you. Bounty hunters also participate in every trade with buying and selling the coin. They mainly sell for the low profit but I can't blame bounty hunter for their behaviour. They are paid for a job and they deserve to get payment with selling the coin for cash.

Indeed, bounty hunters participate in trading activities, so they also support increasing volume but as you say, we can't blame their behavior when it's their reward, they have the right to decide and the volume they can produce is negligible when we can see the value of a bounty, it is not too big. Hunters do not bring too much good or bad influence on the volume of trading of a project, much of that influence comes from big investors and developers, the shares they own in the project are too big, the waves from trading volume are from them