Flagging user broke an agreement and leaking confidential information

[xtraelv]

If you stretch your narrative any thinner, it is going to pop. Supporting the flag does not mean we support everything the creator ever said, it means that we support the claim of the flag, which is supported by bob123's own admissions. This is pretty cut and dry regardless of how badly you wish to distract from that. The only reason the escrow was not arranged was because bob123 accepted the terms that he would pay a set price up front upon consideration of a PM from the user name (as proven by bob123's submissions). He knowingly entered into a contract he did not intend to honor, with intent to take the legal rights of the seller by causing damages. Just because you think the ends justify the means does not change the facts.

It is not about "everything the seller ever said". It is about the specific reasoning he gave when he created the flag.





The OP has been flagged as a scammer by the account he tried to sell that he does not own. How much more scammy can it possibly get ?

[bones261]

I just want to say, that we now have verification that a second account that the OP and his business partner offered for sale was a hacked account. It appears that the OP and his business partner are selling stolen merchandise. But I guess some people believe that we should flag anyone that dare try to expose their shady business. Fortunately, for Nasty Fans, whoever acquired this account didn't realize what kind they could have done. It appears they only shitposted with it.

Recently, it has come to light, that the nonnakip account was recently offered for sale.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157334.0
I just want to make NastyFans aware, so there is no confusion. If the sale is authorized, I think the community should be made aware. If it was not authorized, I am hoping someone can reach out to nonnakip to take proper actions. It appears that the password was changed, recently, so either nonnakip took the proper steps to ensure his account is secure or someone actually purchased the account.
(Please note, there is no evidence that the account seller actually had access to nonakip's account. So it could have been a fib on the account seller's part.)

Yes my account was hacked. I had a unique random 16-character password. I assume there was a security breach at bitcointalk.org.

Thank you for making this public. OgNasty contacts me in private and informs me of the situation. I had no awareness because I am very busy the last months. (Sorry for this!)

I contacted the bitcointalk.org forum and they cooperate very well to help restore my account to me. I change my avatar back and delete forum posts from imposter. The imposter seems to like ethereum and altcoin discussions. The imposter did not send any private messages and did not post anything to mislead others about identity. I think the imposter did not know who nonnakip is. Maybe it just want some Hero account.

I recommend all bitcointalk.org users to update passwords.

[TECSHARE]

I just want to say, that we now have verification that a second account that the OP and his business partner offered for sale was a hacked account. It appears that the OP and his business partner are selling stolen merchandise. But I guess some people believe that we should flag anyone that dare try to expose their shady business. Fortunately, for Nasty Fans, whoever acquired this account didn't realize what kind they could have done. It appears they only shitposted with it.

Recently, it has come to light, that the nonnakip account was recently offered for sale.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157334.0
I just want to make NastyFans aware, so there is no confusion. If the sale is authorized, I think the community should be made aware. If it was not authorized, I am hoping someone can reach out to nonnakip to take proper actions. It appears that the password was changed, recently, so either nonnakip took the proper steps to ensure his account is secure or someone actually purchased the account.
(Please note, there is no evidence that the account seller actually had access to nonakip's account. So it could have been a fib on the account seller's part.)

Yes my account was hacked. I had a unique random 16-character password. I assume there was a security breach at bitcointalk.org.

Thank you for making this public. OgNasty contacts me in private and informs me of the situation. I had no awareness because I am very busy the last months. (Sorry for this!)

I contacted the bitcointalk.org forum and they cooperate very well to help restore my account to me. I change my avatar back and delete forum posts from imposter. The imposter seems to like ethereum and altcoin discussions. The imposter did not send any private messages and did not post anything to mislead others about identity. I think the imposter did not know who nonnakip is. Maybe it just want some Hero account.

I recommend all bitcointalk.org users to update passwords.

Just because Bob123 happened to be correct after the fact does not mean he had any ability to know if these accounts were hacked or legitimately acquired beforehand. Again to summarize...

Lying = not a flaggable offense

Forming a contract you don't keep = flaggable offense

Solution? Don't form contracts you don't intend to keep, even with scumbags. If contracts don't also apply to scumbags they don't apply to any of us.