Does jr. member rank profitable in signature campaign nowadays?

[DdmrDdmr]

<…> the lesser the people who joined the campaign the higher your payout

Correct in terms of tokens of the allocated pool, based on the number of held tokens. The other (and most important) feature to consider is whether the ICO (or whatever other form it may have) is actually looking like it may get anywhere, and eventually hit the exchanges. From there on it depends on a wide variety of elements such as when you actually get your tokens, it they are held for a period of time after the ICO, how the token evolves in terms of price after the ICO, if the ICO looks solid and evolves, etc. Actually, the first and foremost consideration is whether the campaign will even pay out their token to begin with.

[Lucius]

This is why I would like to.know if Jr. Members in rank still can earn huge reward in signature campaign?

Depend on what you think is huge reward, as some other say it is not same if you are user from some country where people work whole month for $10 or maybe $50$, or you live in country where you can earn $1000 or $2000 per month. I know people who are happy to earn $10 per month, because that money help them and their family to live a little better than usual.

Any user who want better payments in signature campaign should take more time and effort in building their profile, this is not something what can be done overnight. Even before merit is introduced, from Newbie -> Legendary it take 2+ years of activity, and today this is even harder task. But it is not only about money, it is also about acquiring new knowledge and new friends.

Faucets used to give out 5 BTC for free. Patience is a virtue.

Imagine that, with one solved captcha you get 5 BTC, and in 2017 value of that coins was $100 000. Who say that faucets are waste of time

http://web.archive.org/web/20100703032414/http://freebitcoins.appspot.com/

[thd26bct]

...

It is not a question should be asked, and you already got lots of answers above. Hence, I want to give you a different recommendation.
Instead of leaving the topic as place for spammers (who will like to post here and hit their quota, besides real constructive users), you should lock the topic.
Additionally, there are topics that collect stories, experiences of others, that you can learn from them:
[INFOGRAPHIC] Experiences of a Bitcointalk Member
Inspirational stories from self-made promoted users
In previous posts, no one told you about forum rules, that you should read them here:
Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ

[o_e_l_e_o]

Its the same thing for startup companies in the real world.  New things have a high failure rate and there are still successful crypto projects being launched.  Most people are just not willing or able to do the research to find the diamonds in the rough.

This is true, but the difference being that start-ups don't try to hire employees to advertise on their behalf, with payment only being paid out after months and consisting solely of a product they created out of thin air that isn't actually worth anything.

The problem with doing research to find the good projects, is that being a good project doesn't necessarily equate to making good gains. There are two altcoins which come to mind which have been launched over the last couple of years which I have vaguely been paying attention to. These projects went on to develop an actual product, move from tokens to their own blockchain, set up business partnerships, etc., which is a lot more than can be said for 99% of altcoins. In terms of price, they have both been slowly losing value in the bear market, and have lost even more now that BTC has taken off again. Compare that to utter scam coins like EOS or Tron, which have been gaining value of late.