Does jr. member rank profitable in signature campaign nowadays?

[erikoy]

I know that this should not be the good question to ask especially that there are newbies and jr. members in rank for one should advise to learn first in cryptocurrency and in the forum.

But, I came from a jr. member in rank and earn sometimes that may consider just fine but most of the time it ain't profitable.

Now, that rank has been modified especially to jr. members like requiring a user to get 1 merit to rank up from newbie to jr.member with 30+ activities and I had been seeing also that in the bounties altcoin section that most of the consider good signature campaign requires at least member in rank. So, jr.members will be deprive from to join in this campaign and other projects also nowadays had increase their participant's qualifications by rank to at least member in rank. This is why I would like to.know if Jr. Members in rank still can earn huge reward in signature campaign?

[1715451578]

1715451578

[1715451578]

1715451578

[OmegaStarScream]

It can be profitable If the campaign doesn't have many participants and at the same time, manage to raise the necessary funds.

Aside from that, altcoin bounties are dying, and that's valid regardless of your rank. People are slowly realizing that ICOs are not worth it and most of them are scams. Therefore, there are no investors and bounty hunters are not paid.

[Upgrade00]

This is why I would like to.know if Jr. Members in rank still can earn huge reward in signature campaign?

The measure of earnings is dependent of the location of the participants and the state of economy if their nation, so you'd get varying answers. But in comparison with other ranks, jr members and members do not earn huge.

And also the age of ICOs has been on the decline over the past months, this has affected bounties and many altcoins, more attention is going to Bitcoin paying bounties nowadays.
Try to keep learning and improving your knowledge to try and rank up.
Improving your grammar would make your post more readable. Good luck!

[nakamura12]

In my opinion it all depends to the campaign itself if the project or the campaign is not scam/legit or it's a pure scam campaign. If you participated in the right campaign then it's profitable for you even if your rank is jr. member. You may earn profit in a Signature-ad campaign or a paid signature campaign that accept participants even if your rank is still at jr. member or the campaign's minimum rank required to be able to join their campaign is jr. member and above.

[mk4]

Right now? Probably not, unless you're from a economically-wrecked country like Zimbabwe or Venezuela. Anyway, you can think of it this way: while the value of the bitcoin payouts you can receive right now from signature campaigns might be quite low(in USD value), if you hold it long enough, it might be worth a lot more in the future.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I know that this should not be the good question to ask

I don't think it's not a good question, I feel it's a perfect question as answers gotten from replies (from experience users) on this questions of yours can also serve as an advice to junior members wanting to earn via paid signature campaigns or bounty campaigns in general.

Beside this question of yours can also be viewed as a survey and I would had loved if junior members in their numbers can contribute to the thread, so we can get a direct experience from the horses mouth themselves. My advice will be for every junior member reading this thread should concentrate more on building his/her account, instead of thinking of a bounty campaign to join. Give yourself value first, personally I don't think junior member payout is profitable irrespective of geographical location.

[o_e_l_e_o]

while the value of the bitcoin payouts you can receive right now from signature campaigns might be quite low(in USD value), if you hold it long enough, it might be worth a lot more in the future.

Unfortunately, most newbies don't think like this. They are here only for some quick and easy money, which is why many of them fall victim to blatant scams or will advertise any old trash in their signature and be paid in worthless altcoins. It's also why many are so desperate to sign up for a campaign immediately instead of just spending some time reading and learning.

Faucets used to give out 5 BTC for free. Patience is a virtue.

[finaleshot2016]

First of all, your question shows your true intention of getting here because some of here might assume that your focus is profit. To answer your question, it's not quite profitable for a Jr. Member in joining signature campaign since it has the lowest stakes and some of the projects are scams. The only thing you can do is earn some merits by being a reputable member, soon you can join bitcoin campaigns so you can show that you really care about the whole community, not just profit.

Trust me, it's not easy to earn profit here if your purpose is just only that.

[Turk Ace]

When people say ICO is this that or the next thing -_-

ICO is not a scam or a waste of money.

Investors are idiots that feed scams and bounty hunters are idiots that work for these scams so no wonder there are fewer people investing. It isn't because of ICO's it's because people are stupid with their money and honestly they deserve to lose it.

Don't worry about it bounty hunting will never die. People are moaning because they support crappy projects or they base their whole opinion on a few scams. Just stop supporting scams it is that easy.

It is definitely worth doing bounty as a Jr member. People all want btc only paying campaign. How silly.

[o_e_l_e_o]

ICO is not a scam or a waste of money.

The vast majority are, though.

Having an ICO doesn't mean you are definitely a scam, sure, but it is a very easy way to get people to send you their money for very little effort. You can buy a premade site, buy the code for a premade token, and launch your ICO on this forum all for less than $100 last I checked. There is no shortage of newbies who will be fooled and send you some cash, even more so if you run a bounty campaign that pays in your completely worthless token which you just created out of thin air. For every ICO which developed in to an actual ongoing working product, there are hundreds, if not thousands, more, which fail, stagnate, bleed out, steal, scam, disappear, and so forth.

BTC paying campaigns are more popular because BTC is actually worth something. Almost all ICOs are not.

[Quickseller]

People are slowly realizing that ICOs are not worth it and most of them are scams. Therefore, there are no investors and bounty hunters are not paid.

Exchanges have started cashing in on the ICO craze, and are doing the leg work required to do basic due diligence on projects and teams, and are leveraging their existing user base to reach many people instead of ICOs trying to advertise on many platforms.

Nearly every project who an exchange will accept will choose to do an IEO on an exchange over doing an ICO on bitcointalk/twitter/other social media.

The Junior member signature cannot display very much, it is not as flashy as higher rank signatures, and the threshold to become a Junior member is low, so there are a lot of them. The lack of signature features, along with huge supply of Junior members means any signature campaign that accepts JRs is going to pay very little.

It doesn't cost anything to wear a signature as a JR member, but what you will earn in a signature campaign is probably not going to be worth your time.

[nakamura12]

ICO is not a scam or a waste of money.

The vast majority are, though.

Yes it's all very true and truth hurts that almost all ICOs are scam and I think that only 0.1% or much lower than 0.1% ICOs that intend to keep what they say in their roadmap and in their ICO website or they will keep their promise that you can earn profit/money
. from your investment in their ICO if you're one of their investors or one of the bounty hunters who are looking for a chance to also earn money by participating in the ICOs different bounty campaigns such as facebook campaign, signature campaign and more. Some ICOs that you'll find are not successful in their fundraising that will be used to build or to improve their ICO which results in abandoning their project that didn't make it or able to achieve the "GOALS" of their project.

[mersal]

I know that this should not be the good question to ask especially that there are newbies and jr. members in rank for one should advise to learn first in cryptocurrency and in the forum.

But, I came from a jr. member rank and does earn sometimes may consider just fine but most of the time it ain't profitable.

Now, that rank has been modified especially to jr. members like requiring a user to get 1 merit to rank up from.newbie to jr.member with 30+ activities. And I had been seeing also that in the bounties altcoin section that most of the consider good signature campaign requires at least member in rank. So, jr.members will be deprive from to join in this campaign. And other projects also nowadays had increase their participant's qualifications by rank to at least member in rank. This is why I would like to.know if Jr. Members in rank still can earn huge reward in signature campaign?

As far as I know currently there is no bitcoin paying signature campaign accepts Jr.member rank.

But lot of opportunities on bounties but need patience to make rewards on bounties and also it will be a hard job for them to choose a legit project to promote.

They can bear bounty signature and learn meanwhile then chance to get required merits to join on bitcoin paying signature campaigns.

[LTU_btc]

"Profitable" is subjective thing. You can get some money from signature campaigns even byvbeing Jr. Member, but you won't earn much.
If we are talking about altcoin bounties only, in general it's not profitable for all ranks. Bitcoin paying signature campaigns is different thing, you can earn decent money from it, especially if you live in poor country. But as you see, there are no Bitcoin paying campaigns currently accepting Jr. Members. Main reason why - because such advertising isn't effective. Jr. Members can't even have links in their signatures and they signatures are with very limited effects and no colours. This is why Bitcoin paying campaigns choose higher ranked members.

[joniboini]

Most bounties right now are more or less like a gamble. I do suggest Jr. Members to hold their coins from their signature campaign if it's possible, and see what it's worth 5 years later. But that is not possible if you use signature campaign or any other economic activities from this forum as your main income.

I do believe that 0.003 BTC can worth the same as 0.03 or even 0.3 in the near future. The problem is that you need to hold it for a long time. But at this moment, having Jr. Member is relatively worthless if you compare it with having Member or higher rank, and looking at how many opportunities that Jr. Member has in BTC sig campaign, which is pretty small.

[VDraci]

Whatever you get with Jr member account is based on how many participants joined the signature campaign I think ,since the bounty allocation is in stakes ,I'm aware that few projects accepts on from members account and excluded Jr members but many bounty projects still include Jr members ,what you should be worried about is how many people joined the signature campaign ,the lesser the people who joined the campaign the higher your payout

[mersal]

Whatever you get with Jr member account is based on how many participants joined the signature campaign I think ,since the bounty allocation is in stakes ,I'm aware that few projects accepts on from members account and excluded Jr members but many bounty projects still include Jr members ,what you should be worried about is how many people joined the signature campaign ,the lesser the people who joined the campaign the higher your payout

If it is a better project then more people will join on it,if it doesn't then no point of having huge amount of their tokens.So still lower the rank the chances of making rewards is lesser.

[pealr12]

Yes, jr member ranks are also profitable if they joined in signature campaign as long the bounty has few participants  and if the reward is good. And every jr member can increase thier rewards if they joined in social media campaign of the said bounty.

[bitmover]

. This is why I would like to.know if Jr. Members in rank still can earn huge reward in signature campaign?

You will not earn huge rewards as a member or jr member.
When I joined the forum I already had some cryptocurrency knowledge and the merit system was already implemented. I joined a Yahoo signature campaign as a jr member and earned something like 0.0001 a week. It was not profitable, but it was an investment in my account.

The rewards will get higher in time, and if you are not a spammer you will rank up and will get accepted in good payment campaigns, as I did

Use your free time in the forum, read more than you write and you will be rewarded.

[Indamuck]

ICO is not a scam or a waste of money.

The vast majority are, though.

Having an ICO doesn't mean you are definitely a scam, sure, but it is a very easy way to get people to send you their money for very little effort. You can buy a premade site, buy the code for a premade token, and launch your ICO on this forum all for less than $100 last I checked. There is no shortage of newbies who will be fooled and send you some cash, even more so if you run a bounty campaign that pays in your completely worthless token which you just created out of thin air. For every ICO which developed in to an actual ongoing working product, there are hundreds, if not thousands, more, which fail, stagnate, bleed out, steal, scam, disappear, and so forth.

BTC paying campaigns are more popular because BTC is actually worth something. Almost all ICOs are not.

Its the same thing for startup companies in the real world.  New things have a high failure rate and there are still successful crypto projects being launched.  Most people are just not willing or able to do the research to find the diamonds in the rough.