Shit Dev not shit coin

[Finestream]

I don't necessarily blame the devs. Some actually tried to do their best to keep their projects alive but the space was full of get rich quick millennial so they had no patience to wait for projects to mature. Actually, what I have observed in crypto is that investors do kill projects at a faster rate more than the devs/owners.

You cannot blame the investors for them, they will always do the pressure game because they want to have their ROI at the earliest possible time.

Devs should not work by their emotion but by their mind, they are expected to be qualified enough to develop the project and that includes accepting the pressure, therefore they need to make a good plan for the project to survive even in tough times, if some investors will leave, new ones might come if they see that the team are capable and the project has potential to grow, remember that IEO and ICO are mostly start up projects, so it will take time to see its real value.

[Viceroy]

That sounds reasonable. With this internet era, publicity is the best policy for cleaning the space. Social networks will help a lot.

[mihtju]

These concepts are interrelated. If dev cannot provide normal development of the coin, such coin to will turn into shit. After all, they should try to provide for its normal value of the coin and development.

[BitcoinPanther]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

I don't think we should do that because some of the projects I know are where the CEO/COO just hire devs to create or work on the project. If they were shit devs then I don't think there wouldn't be investors at all because it will be seen as obvious scam from the  start. And some shitcoins was a result of either a failed project or an exit scam.

The problem lies on the developer because several of them do this kind of work to earn money and accept more work to earn more money.  I agree CEO/COO hires their developers but they must make sure that the developers their hired is solely focus on their project since these developers have a huge cut on the token and collected funds.  But if a project become shitty, both CEO and the team are to be blame because they did not do their task well.

[Google+]

I think there are a lot of scam projects because of very greedy developers, they just want to get a lot of profit but don't want to provide good developments for investors so that the projects fail in the middle of the road.