Shit Dev not shit coin

[Mealea]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

[coaprotet]

A new coin could have really great potential, it can even work and have some value by being competitive already. But the problem is the poor management, less of marketing and development, and stupid funds investment can ruin any crypto currency.

[rosezionjohn]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum,

Criticizing the product is also criticizing the developer. 

i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

There is already a scam accusation board for developers who plagiarized whitepapers and those who fake their identity. I don't think it is necessary to publish names of poor performing coins which are usually labeled as shit coins. You, OP, may do so if you are really up to it.

[Red-Apple]

but they are the same thing. a shit developer creates a shitcoin.

and the problem is not either of them in my opinion. the problem is the community investing in these shitty projects. if you and i don't buy into the ICO scams, garbage altcoins, fork coins, bitcoin copies, centralized altcions,... then these shitcoins die in their first day instead of staying around for years filling the market with garbage.

[BlackFor3st]

You have a good idea and what I can say that most of the shitcoins are coming from shit devs but don't forget also that there are high ranked devs that operates also a shitcoin so we need to be careful as most of the season devs wants an easy money.

Once they will be able to get their shares from the project then they can just leave it and proceed to another project. There are plenty of cases like this, so your solution might help but it cannot fully clean up the shitcoins out there though it can surely help.

[kenelmark]

I strongly agree that the names of the coin shit developers appear in this forum, so that we are no longer trapped in the projects that he developed, because so many shit coins were born in cryptocurrency

[mersal]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

Shitcoin or shit developer but the outcome is same shit project sonits better to avoid all the new project then only this issue will be resolved.But scam projects are more dangerous which could take all your money so exposed scammers can be found on scam accusation but you can't decide a project is decide until it lose its total value.

[DeepChipolino]

but they are the same thing. a shit developer creates a shitcoin.

and the problem is not either of them in my opinion. the problem is the community investing in these shitty projects. if you and i don't buy into the ICO scams, garbage altcoins, fork coins, bitcoin copies, centralized altcions,... then these shitcoins die in their first day instead of staying around for years filling the market with garbage.

You, as always, reason correctly. However...
It is known that people seek profit. No matter what kind of tool it is, it is important that you can make money on it. If the investor realizes that this particular asset can be pumped after the purchase, he buys. No crypto-ideologies, only business. And money, as you know, does not smell.
So, question: will we buy into a new promising altcoin?.. And when there is the next wave of newcomers, it will be clean fuel for all this shit.

[LogitechMouse]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

There is a correlation between them. A shit coin is equal to a shit developers. I think you didn't know it that is why you posted thread like this .
Just know what are the shitcoins and do some research on it and find its developers then post it here. In crypto world, there is no such thing as justice especially for those who got scammed by different ICO's.

[airdropdude]

I think the issue is not about shitcoin of shit dev. If you take a good look at the situation, you will notice that it's better we say shit project.
Why?
Some project them selves contains bunch of shit people. Team, community and more.
So, instead of saying shit coin, dev, team, community, Let's join everything and say Shit project. 

[wedosgibas]

Haha, that's a good idea, where there's a bad coin behind it is a bad team. They mostly only work with names or even fake names and photos to make some shit projects. It's hard if not see their true identity, a good thing now is to make all investors aware, especially those new to stay away from projects with teams and communities is not clear.

[rdluffy]

It's the same thing, and it's easier to find and know a name of a coin instead of the names of devs who are working on bad coins

And don't forget, maybe a good dev is working on a bad coin and there are other developers working on the same project, you have to consider this before publishing any names

[Red-Apple]

but they are the same thing. a shit developer creates a shitcoin.

and the problem is not either of them in my opinion. the problem is the community investing in these shitty projects. if you and i don't buy into the ICO scams, garbage altcoins, fork coins, bitcoin copies, centralized altcions,... then these shitcoins die in their first day instead of staying around for years filling the market with garbage.

You, as always, reason correctly. However...
It is known that people seek profit. No matter what kind of tool it is, it is important that you can make money on it. If the investor realizes that this particular asset can be pumped after the purchase, he buys. No crypto-ideologies, only business. And money, as you know, does not smell.
So, question: will we buy into a new promising altcoin?.. And when there is the next wave of newcomers, it will be clean fuel for all this shit.

i agree. that is unfortunately correct. people's greed always controls this market. that is why we have so many over hyped and over pumped shitcoins among the top 10 altcoins at the moment even though they are purely garbage projects.
i still haven't lost faith in the market though. i believe that if some day finally we see even 1 good altcoin it will grow easily and without big drops.

[Jating]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

I think it boils down to the team, those who are making the project, those who invent and give the idea, and not blame the developers. Developers just code everything based on the requirements of the project, they don't have any idea if this is shit of not.

I don't know if you have been in a software development, but let me tell you that developer just follow what the project wants. It's up to the CEO or some higher management want they want their project to be. Developers have nothing to say at all, they just code, then someone will test it based on the requirements, just saying.

[imstillthebest]

alot of devs are actually already exposed but the number of those so called sh3t coins are still growing with anonymous creators or creator of those coins can use fake names and faces so that they can escape freely and make another sh3t coin again.  you cant totally control or stop them but we can just ignore them , if no one will invest they can just die and be de listed eventually  . problem solved

[GREENch]

The telegram is full of crypto groups that follow new projects and take them apart right up to the cog. Here's a good example: the crooks behind the Crypterium project have now created the GramEx exchange. As for me, in mobile messengers more convenient to follow such news than to go to the forum.

[ashmodeus]

,i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

i guess about it , has announced already a few years ago, forum not responsible for all scam investments or something like that.
but the good news , u can post some scam project on the forum in Scam Accusations.

[aemma]

Funny as it sounds but that's the reality on ground, however when I see all these worthless or shit coins  what normally comes to mind is the developers behind it, the same is with good coins. But most times, some of these fraudulent developers or team uses fake pictures and identity, thereby publishing their information on the forum might not really produce a good result. Instead I think the best way is to drag their project to this forum for those who aren't aware to be informed, in this way, we will succeed in helping bring down the project while saving potential buyers.

[Ucy]

That sounds like a good idea but how do you prove someone is a "s*t developer"? I guess you'll have to gather some real convincing evidences that show he/she is doing things outside of the "accepted standard". Unfortunately, we don't have a well defined standard yet for developers in Crypto world. We could borrow good standards from the professional non-crypto world, combine them with Bitcoin/Blockchain ideals and make every developers adopt the new standard?
Or we could create our own home-grown standard?

[cizatext]

A lot of alarm has been raised on shit coins which have become a concern to many in the crypto sphere, but i feel our attention should be on the shit developer rather talk about the shit coins. The reason why we have shit coins all over is because the number of shit developers has increased to the maximum, i guess it is time to begin to publish the names of shit developers on the forum in order to do some justice to the crypto sphere.

Shit developer's and team always give birth to shit coin the two work hand in hand you can't separate them from each other, if a team is legit and focuses on it development then the coin can never be term shit coin any ways.