Abusing behaviours by nutildah and JollyGood

[nutildah]

How about you stop being lazy and do your own research? This is the internet: anybody can say anything, and without proof or something to back it up, it means nothing.

first thing first, why this is a newbie account:
theymos once said this:

when you do not want to mess up with your original account, create a new one

Ah yes, the clause that launched a thousand shit stirring alt accounts. You took the liberty of rewording it a bit, but that's fine.

You're no Edward Snowden. You're not a whistleblower reporting on a wrongdoing that exposes the faults of the system. You're just stirring shit because you're mad I tagged one your other accounts. Have a fantastic day.

[FatFork]

in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here

This is contradictory. There can be no abuse of trust feedback if it is used against scammers and cheaters. What you call abuse, most DT members consider a fair use of the trust system.

[JollyGood]

Kinda curious, if all these accounts are connected why is only 1 tagged? If they are a cheater on 1 account, wouldn't that mean cheater on all? Assuming the proof posted is concrete evidence. I would invite all the other accounts to chime in.

The concrete part of the proof is rejected by the OP using his TheGreatPython account with the most pointless of excuses imaginable but he had to make at least one attempt to get the tags removed otherwise all of his efforts to build up the account would have been wasted. It is quite laughable to be honest.

I cannot speak for others but I have not had time to going through them to determine which tags are appropriate for them but I intend to tag accounts that deserve them, it all comes down to having enough time.

all boiled down to a biased tag without analysing full story or a tag on request, right?

Wrong 

[examplens]

all boiled down to a biased tag without analysing full story or a tag on request, right?

Wrong 

Man, check his ^BTT_Temp_Acc writing style, we have seen it many times. But he has already changed so many accounts that it is difficult to remember all of them. Register a new account to insult and try to make new dramas with DT members, if he had done it with one of the older accounts, no one would have paid attention.
I would not take him seriously in any further discussion.

[JollyGood]

in my opinion, abuse is abuse even against a scammer.this leads me to post here

This is contradictory. There can be no abuse of trust feedback if it is used against scammers and cheaters. What you call abuse, most DT members consider a fair use of the trust system.

Do you have any suspicions as to who is behind the BTT_Temp_Acc? I think I know.

Man, check his ^BTT_Temp_Acc writing style, we have seen it many times. But he has already changed so many accounts that it is difficult to remember all of them. Register a new account to insult and try to make new dramas with DT members, if he had done it with one of the older accounts, no one would have paid attention.
I would not take him seriously in any further discussion.

If it is not the OP then one thing is for sure, the pattern is very similar to another member.

As you stated, there are that many alt-accounts that it is difficult to remember them all but the pattern does stand out but you are right because if he used the same old tagged accounts nobody would have paid attention and may would have kept them on ignore. It seems easier to create an account, attack some members then go back in to hiding.