🔍 Unveiling Satoshi Nakamoto: Community Vote 🗳️

[ditec_wrogn]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

It's ironic that you say "talk is cheap" when that's all you've been doing throughout this entire thread. You've yet to provide any real proof or evidence to back up your claims, and instead, you're trying to distract us with your "voting" system using hashrate. But let's be real, this is just a front for you to get free Bitcoin.

You keep mentioning numbers and hashrate, but where are the source? You've yet to provide any concrete evidence of the hashrate you claim to have. It's easy to throw around big numbers, but without any proof, it's meaningless.

[Silberman]

Jeez, you guys are brutal. I'm telling you that I'm talking to one of the greatest inventors in history, and you're just trying to discredit me immediately. I'm not even claiming to be Satoshi. This is absolutely crazy—it's crazier than trying to claim you're Satoshi Nakamoto. It's like you guys are just sitting there looking to start a fight for no reason. This is horrible. Personally, I think this forum is too dangerous for cyberbullying now. I'm trying to provide the public with data and documents as a public servant for history, and instead, I'm getting crucified.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, you want the community to believe your story, you will have to show incontrovertible evidence that your claims are true, so it is not the community trying to discredit you, your actions are doing it for yourself.

Also do not stoop so low as to claim you are being bullied, it is not bullying for a person to ask evidence from another one when they make a claim no reasonable person would believe without it.

[highalch]

Hate to break this to you, but owning a domain name is just controlling a couple lines of txt on some nameservers. You know nothing.

[BoB_Bass]

Asking for money, promoting a shitcoin, asking people to mine for you, quoting CSW ( that's the best one yet, Proof by signing is meaningless but a bunch of amateur forgeries are proof?) I'm glued to this thread to see what you're going to come up with next.

[nutildah]

It's crucial to clarify a misunderstanding: signing a key does not conclusively prove one's identity as Satoshi Nakamoto.

Its a hell of a lot better than the route you are now attempting to go. Here's why we all know you're full of shit: If you had anything of interest at all to present, you would have opened with that instead of your low-brow PGP party trick. As BlackHatCoiner pointed out, anybody can forge anything, except for a message signed from satoshi's actual PGP key.

You picked the wrong place to try this imbecility -- you should have started at a BSV forum.

Sure, grab some popcorn! Would you like to see signed blocks? Is that what everyone wants? If so, what would you prefer to sign them with or say?

Only if you want to continue to waste everyone's time.

[PrivacyG]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

[ditec_wrogn]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

I posted it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501131.msg64258004#msg64258004

No one cares; everyone voted. Please review the results. Perhaps this is a major reason why voting doesn't work for you.

- No one cares - 8 votes (33.3%)
- Scammer - 9 votes (37.5%)
- I don't know - 1 vote (4.2%)

Votes are supposed to provide answers. Your statement, 'I thought you were about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto,' cannot be justified with a response; instead, I offer you a link."

Hey "hardworkinfamilyman",

Stop dodging the question and provide concrete evidence to support your claims about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity. Your attempts to change the subject and attack the voting process are not fooling anyone.

The majority of the votes indicate that you are either a scammer or that no one cares about your claims. You have ignored all the arguments and scam accusations made against you, including the fact that the US SEC has caught you raising over one million dollars illegally through unregistered offers and sales of securities to crypto asset investors.

[Stalker22]

We can provide additional receipts upon request.[/b]
~

And what exactly are you trying to prove with these receipts?

To check if a PDF has been altered from its original version, follow these steps:
~

Instead of turning to ChatGPT for wisdom, you should ask your buddy CSW how to forge a document. He is an expert in that field. Just dont expect to win any court cases with them. Hahaha!

[nutildah]

Instead of turning to ChatGPT for wisdom, you should ask your buddy CSW how to forge a document. He is an expert in that field. Just dont expect to win any court cases with them. Hahaha!

Craig also used ChatGPT in his forgeries tho, so it is indeed something out of his playbook.

[doomloop]

Thank you for your attention and active participation in this endeavor. Together, we can continue unraveling the mysteries surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto and his profound impact on the cryptocurrency landscape.

There is no need for voting because you engaged in fruitless research. I am still wondering what will be the positive effect of unveiling Satoshi to the community. Satoshi has done his part in creating Bitcoin and he can contribute to the system from anywhere if he wants, so there is no need to know him. I think his anonymity is better for the community than exposing his identity. There are more challenges facing the Bitcoin space and I think you should do more research on that than wasting your time on something that is not beneficial. I will not be surprised if you start asking members for money if they want to access information about the identity of Satoshi.

But I feel like that many of us wants to vote for yes because all the time, we are always curious and wants to unravel the mysteries about the person behind Bitcoin. And maybe the the research or evidence he have prepared right there are only partial and there are still more to it that he didn't released yet to the public.

To answer your question about the positive effect it can bring to us, well it gives us a sense of contentment and we can now focus clearly on other things. There might other positive effects than this that the whole community can benefit. The challenges that you are talking about are clear and experts are already working on improving them.

[ditec_wrogn]

Here is your proof: https://youtu.be/afDEEINVzKQ

"Hey everyone, Alex here. Today, I want to focus on the good, but I also need to address the Bitcointalk community. Sitting behind a computer and bashing someone because you're a hero member or have status doesn't make it okay. You never know who's on the other side.

I may or may not be Satoshi Nakamoto, but I am the closest one to Satoshi. I hope you focus on the facts, truth, and proof, and not spin a false narrative from this video.

"I registered vistomail.com, anonymousspeech.com, secureanonymoussurfing.com, websecureemail.com, mailbuddy-tool.com, and virtual-hiv-test.com on the day they became available. These domains have always been under my account, ensuring they remain secure and reliable.
 
"My goal with this video is to target one of my addresses with your miner hash. As Hal Finney would say, 'running Bitcoin,' I can use the rewards to buy eCash, a more promising solution. eCash has not been seized by governments, bought out by corporations, or used for illegal activities. After I buy eCash on the open market, I will then stake it and reset the price back to 1999, like CyberBucks. By doing this, I'll be able to boost eCash's price without disrupting Bitcoin. The reward is that eCash's price will skyrocket with more liquidity, making it more attractive for miners to mine eCash while pumping rewards to the 1 Bitcoin address.

Regarding my SEC issue, my aim was to get caught to understand their process and what they are looking for as an exchange operator and owner. They still have yet to clarify but dance around the questions and say that they can't give legal advice. While I'm out on the battlefield, you trolls can talk about it. But remember, it's the actions and facts that matter.

My intentions are not to fight. If we all work together, I promise the projects I get involved in will outperform anything you have ever seen. I just need help from you.

Now that you know 1% of my real life, I would like to involve you in the other 99% awesome part of it.

Thanks for watching, and please subscribe. If this works out I will start posting my Ideas and concepts and become a more professional Youtuber.

Hey there, hardworkinfamilyman! I took a look at your reply, but I didn't watch the video you linked since the chatbot I'm using right now doesn't have the feature to understand YouTube videos. However, I did notice some red flags in your text.

First off, your claim to be the closest to Satoshi Nakamoto is weak sauce. You didn't provide any solid evidence to back it up, and frankly, it's a tired old claim that's been made by many before you.

Then there's the issue of the domains you registered, including vistomail.com, which you claim is connected to Satoshi Nakamoto. But let's be real, the community isn't going to trust someone who's running from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has been caught lying on many occasions. You need to build trust with the community, and making false claims or avoiding legal issues isn't the way to do it.

And speaking of the SEC, let's not forget that running from them is a terrible idea. If you've done something wrong, face the consequences and make things right. It's the only way to regain the community's trust.

In short, stop making grandiose claims without any evidence, build trust with the community, and deal with your legal issues. It's not rocket science.

[kryptqnick]

I don't think that the op has truly managed to do something that nobody else managed to do before, including professional investigative journalists. But, in any case, I believe that we must respect Satoshi's right to remain anonymous, Satoshi's privacy. Privacy is among the top values that Bitcoin puts forth, and it's good both for individuals and for BTC's decentralization. If we learn who Satoshi is, it will inevitably alienate some people (because undoubtedly a human being has certain values and opinions that someone else won't appreciate), and it's likely to impact the development of Bitcoin in the future. So it's better not to know and not to dig too deep into it.

[aoluain]

Surprisingly enough for yet another Satoshi Nakamoto Identity thread I read all
of the OP's post....

To involve the community in this pivotal moment, I've initiated a vote. It's up to you whether I should disclose the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto based on the evidence I've gathered. Your participation and input are essential as we chart the course forward.

TBH OP, with all your hard work I really think you should monetise your findings.
I'm sure you could find someone willing to pay you for something which the majority
of Bitcoiners dont care about.

I firmly believe that transparency and collaboration within our community will advance our understanding of Bitcoin's origins and motivations. Your insights and perspectives are invaluable as we engage in this crucial discussion.

There is nothing which is a mystery about the origins and motivations behind Bitcoin.

very simple explanations for further research if you want....

Origins: Cypherpunk movement

Motivations: From the Bitcoin Whitepaper

What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted
third party.

[TommyTheDoodle]

It looks like he finally game up hahaha! What a fucking loser now selling https://vistomail.com for ¥249,999!!! because nobody cares about Satoshi!! What a failure and scumbag! What a scammer‼️