🔍 Unveiling Satoshi Nakamoto: Community Vote 🗳️

[Doan9269]

Please take a moment to vote and share your thoughts on whether we should unveil Satoshi Nakamoto's identity.

Do you think we care about knowing Satoshi Nakamoto's identity, if we all know it, what are we going to do with it and what does it also benefit on you, its more better for you take quickly realize the opportunity ahead of you and grab it by understanding the same benefits many are getting from bitcoin adoption instead of lurking around the corners in searching for who Satoshi is or claiming to be him.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

Please take a moment to vote and share your thoughts on whether we should unveil Satoshi Nakamoto's identity.

Do you think we care about knowing Satoshi Nakamoto's identity, if we all know it, what are we going to do with it and what does it also benefit on you, its more better for you take quickly realize the opportunity ahead of you and grab it by understanding the same benefits many are getting from bitcoin adoption instead of lurking around the corners in searching for who Satoshi is or claiming to be him.

The only opportunity I would seize is to ask the Bitcoin community to use their influence to list X1Coin on crypto exchanges for all my miners. I cannot operate an exchange as I have had trouble with the SEC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25785.pdf).

I needed Satoshi's knowledge to analyze Bitcoin data for the last 15 years and enhance the parameters using AI to create X1C.

[seoincorporation]

The only opportunity I would seize is to ask the Bitcoin community to use their influence to list X1Coin on crypto exchanges for all my miners. I cannot operate an exchange as I have had trouble with the SEC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25785.pdf).

I needed Satoshi's knowledge to analyze Bitcoin data for the last 15 years and enhance the parameters using AI to create X1C.

So, you already scammed $1M and want the support from the community to scam more?

Defendants perpetrated a fraudulent scheme through three nominally separate enterprises to illegally raise over one million dollars in proceeds through the unregistered offers and sales of these securities to crypto asset investors

You can't prove who satoshi is, you proved you are a scammer, and even with that you want support from the community? What's wrong with you?

This will not have a happy end, you will only burn your reputation here, but good luck, i don't have anything else to apport to your thread, from the start i chose the option "Scammer" in your poll.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

Jeez, you guys are brutal. I'm telling you that I'm talking to one of the greatest inventors in history, and you're just trying to discredit me immediately. I'm not even claiming to be Satoshi. This is absolutely crazy—it's crazier than trying to claim you're Satoshi Nakamoto. It's like you guys are just sitting there looking to start a fight for no reason. This is horrible. Personally, I think this forum is too dangerous for cyberbullying now. I'm trying to provide the public with data and documents as a public servant for history, and instead, I'm getting crucified.

Inventors like Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, and Marie Curie faced similar challenges, History always repeats itself. Now you can add Satoshi Nakamoto to the List.

The only opportunity I would seize is to ask the Bitcoin community to use their influence to list X1Coin on crypto exchanges for all my miners. I cannot operate an exchange as I have had trouble with the SEC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25785.pdf).

I needed Satoshi's knowledge to analyze Bitcoin data for the last 15 years and enhance the parameters using AI to create X1C.

So, you already scammed $1M and want the support from the community to scam more?

Defendants perpetrated a fraudulent scheme through three nominally separate enterprises to illegally raise over one million dollars in proceeds through the unregistered offers and sales of these securities to crypto asset investors

You can't prove who satoshi is, you proved you are a scammer, and even with that you want support from the community? What's wrong with you?

This will not have a happy end, you will only burn your reputation here, but good luck, i don't have anything else to apport to your thread, from the start i chose the option "Scammer" in your poll.

I mined 5,000 X1C. There are no pre-mined and a lot of work went into this project.

[Lucius]

The only opportunity I would seize is to ask the Bitcoin community to use their influence to list X1Coin on crypto exchanges for all my miners. I cannot operate an exchange as I have had trouble with the SEC (https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2023/comp25785.pdf).
I needed Satoshi's knowledge to analyze Bitcoin data for the last 15 years and enhance the parameters using AI to create X1C.

I was just wondering when you were going to mention the project you have in your profile because this was a good way to get attention before revealing to everyone what it was all about. The fact that you want the knowledge of someone who invented BTC in order to use it to launch some kind of altcoin really makes no sense. Why don't you ask AI when you already plan to use it?

Jeez, you guys are brutal. --- I'm trying to provide the public with data and documents as a public servant for history, and instead, I'm getting crucified.
~snip~

Your intentions are clear, promoting a project that has nothing to do with BTC, so stop mentioning it because your topic will end up in the altcoins board.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

If you believe, point your miner hash power to this address= bc1qpsa8q6supe8uxzeedu0zu974t2lp7atrlas5n8
Let the numbers speak.

That's how voting is done.

[ditec_wrogn]

I can't believe I even have to waste my time addressing you. Your claims of having information about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity are laughable. You provide a GPG key that isn't owned by Satoshi and some questionable receipts as "proof" but that doesn't cut it. If Satoshi really wanted to reveal himself, he would do it through official channels, not some shady vote on a forum. And the fact that you suggested using hashrate as a way to vote is just another red flag, it's not a proper way to make decisions in the community.

And let's not forget the fact that you asked for money tips, that's a huge red flag right there. And the fact that you've been tagged as a scammer on this forum, multiple times, just goes to show that you're not trustworthy. I've even gone ahead and created a thread discussing your scammy behavior, I encourage everyone to check it out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501045.msg64255041#msg64255041 and support flagging you as a scammer on your profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3316.

I hope this serves as a warning to anyone who comes across your posts, stay away from this scammer.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

As we approach the election, here's how you can participate in the fair voting process using hashrate:

Satoshi: bc1qpsa8q6supe8uxzeedu0zu974t2lp7atrlas5n8
Trump: bc1p4ulwka6k5a85e9kxv3rnrr75vd0j8uu3ajdgvknjgexnsvneatwqc2cz8d
Biden: 1CApVwjqTysaCeydsBhYpe7AaDQDD8t1M2

The candidate with the highest hashrate by NOV 5, 2024, will emerge victorious.

That's how you should replace traditional voting, do you have any better ideas?

[hardworkinfamilyman]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.


Participants first digitally sign their messages to authenticate them. Each participant is represented by a unique address (likely a public key), and the winner of the election is determined by the highest hashrate, indicating significant computational support or influence within the system, which could be akin to a blockchain-based voting or consensus mechanism.

[ditec_wrogn]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

It's ironic that you say "talk is cheap" when that's all you've been doing throughout this entire thread. You've yet to provide any real proof or evidence to back up your claims, and instead, you're trying to distract us with your "voting" system using hashrate. But let's be real, this is just a front for you to get free Bitcoin.

You keep mentioning numbers and hashrate, but where are the source? You've yet to provide any concrete evidence of the hashrate you claim to have. It's easy to throw around big numbers, but without any proof, it's meaningless.

[Silberman]

Jeez, you guys are brutal. I'm telling you that I'm talking to one of the greatest inventors in history, and you're just trying to discredit me immediately. I'm not even claiming to be Satoshi. This is absolutely crazy—it's crazier than trying to claim you're Satoshi Nakamoto. It's like you guys are just sitting there looking to start a fight for no reason. This is horrible. Personally, I think this forum is too dangerous for cyberbullying now. I'm trying to provide the public with data and documents as a public servant for history, and instead, I'm getting crucified.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, you want the community to believe your story, you will have to show incontrovertible evidence that your claims are true, so it is not the community trying to discredit you, your actions are doing it for yourself.

Also do not stoop so low as to claim you are being bullied, it is not bullying for a person to ask evidence from another one when they make a claim no reasonable person would believe without it.

[highalch]

Hate to break this to you, but owning a domain name is just controlling a couple lines of txt on some nameservers. You know nothing.

[BoB_Bass]

Asking for money, promoting a shitcoin, asking people to mine for you, quoting CSW ( that's the best one yet, Proof by signing is meaningless but a bunch of amateur forgeries are proof?) I'm glued to this thread to see what you're going to come up with next.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

Sure, grab some popcorn! Would you like to see signed blocks? Is that what everyone wants? If so, what would you prefer to sign them with or say?

[nutildah]

It's crucial to clarify a misunderstanding: signing a key does not conclusively prove one's identity as Satoshi Nakamoto.

Its a hell of a lot better than the route you are now attempting to go. Here's why we all know you're full of shit: If you had anything of interest at all to present, you would have opened with that instead of your low-brow PGP party trick. As BlackHatCoiner pointed out, anybody can forge anything, except for a message signed from satoshi's actual PGP key.

You picked the wrong place to try this imbecility -- you should have started at a BSV forum.

Sure, grab some popcorn! Would you like to see signed blocks? Is that what everyone wants? If so, what would you prefer to sign them with or say?

Only if you want to continue to waste everyone's time.

[PrivacyG]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

[hardworkinfamilyman]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

I posted it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501131.msg64258004#msg64258004

No one cares; everyone voted. Please review the results. Perhaps this is a major reason why voting doesn't work for you.

- No one cares - 8 votes (33.3%)
- Scammer - 9 votes (37.5%)
- I don't know - 1 vote (4.2%)

Votes are supposed to provide answers. Your statement, 'I thought you were about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto,' cannot be justified with a response; instead, I offer you a link."

[ditec_wrogn]

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

I posted it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501131.msg64258004#msg64258004

No one cares; everyone voted. Please review the results. Perhaps this is a major reason why voting doesn't work for you.

- No one cares - 8 votes (33.3%)
- Scammer - 9 votes (37.5%)
- I don't know - 1 vote (4.2%)

Votes are supposed to provide answers. Your statement, 'I thought you were about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto,' cannot be justified with a response; instead, I offer you a link."

Hey "hardworkinfamilyman",

Stop dodging the question and provide concrete evidence to support your claims about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity. Your attempts to change the subject and attack the voting process are not fooling anyone.

The majority of the votes indicate that you are either a scammer or that no one cares about your claims. You have ignored all the arguments and scam accusations made against you, including the fact that the US SEC has caught you raising over one million dollars illegally through unregistered offers and sales of securities to crypto asset investors.

[hardworkinfamilyman]

I have, but it seems you're unwilling to understand. Please review the metadata indicating the PDF is directly downloaded from the GoDaddy Dashboard, confirming it has not been altered. We can provide additional receipts upon request.

You can view the receipts here:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9lzu6cgdldj3ck0s3a2l5/vistomail-2006.pdf?rlkey=d98qwhruo826ienkysjxjymbw&st=ni5emrb0&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0b1njt83y0d6zmolls6y1/vistomail-2008.pdf?rlkey=q6vvtcgz2w57rp84put4xpt28&st=t2uddzeg&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rwf5afp9t75v8shut2q4y/secureanonymoussurfing.pdf?rlkey=ogl4gti5y1utlr5qj7l3ound7&st=bk3oc0zt&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i69dvlysyhwbo5r8zecmb/Anonymousspeech.com?rlkey=vpti31kiqs00awxmu7e9r1lfs&st=7mda0bv9&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0l5w653dio3tz4euz3fya/3.pdf?rlkey=y5mbkq84s8l2vaqxtg7i3ln9z&st=i0h0qw6q&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/o885giwc9953g6dfqtchg/websecureemail.com?rlkey=bpqyxu6lo1ile8dguw2sq8kvh&st=ifzjma8n&dl=0

To check if a PDF has been altered from its original version, follow these steps:

Metadata Inspection: PDF files contain metadata that can indicate the software used to create or modify them, creation dates, and more. Check this metadata to see if it matches the expected details from the original source.

Digital Signatures: Some PDFs may include digital signatures, which verify the authenticity and integrity of the document. If present, verify the signature to ensure the document has not been altered since it was signed.

Compare Versions: If you have access to the original PDF, compare it visually or using specialized software designed for detecting differences between documents. Look for changes in text, formatting, or content.

Checksums or Hash Values: Compute and compare checksums or hash values (such as MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) of the original and current PDF files. A change in these values indicates alterations.

Third-Party Tools: Use specialized PDF forensic tools or validators that can analyze the file for signs of tampering or modifications.

By following these methods, you can determine if a PDF has been altered from its original version, ensuring its authenticity and reliability.

[Stalker22]

We can provide additional receipts upon request.[/b]
~

And what exactly are you trying to prove with these receipts?

To check if a PDF has been altered from its original version, follow these steps:
~

Instead of turning to ChatGPT for wisdom, you should ask your buddy CSW how to forge a document. He is an expert in that field. Just dont expect to win any court cases with them. Hahaha!