Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 06:55:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Should Zumzero get negative feedback for scamming people in the ActM thread?  (Read 663 times)
Mabsark (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
 #1

I think he should and I think everyone who has been abused by the mods in that shitty thread should leave some negative feedback.
Mabsark (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 07:52:38 PM
 #2

Why zumzero only?

- All the thread moderators (and they don't reveal who they are, being smart scammers)
- All the users that had an official PR role: Streets 2.0, ffssixtynine, lolstate, Vbs, lewicki, Bargraphics

But really, just let moderated threads die. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297530.0 has been thousands times more informative, including insights into kslaugther's past scams.

I was just about to post here to add "ActM Thread" and "kslaughter" to the list. They're looking nice and red now.
Mabsark (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 08:15:40 PM
 #3

VinceSamios just confirmed himself as a mod as well.
VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2014, 08:30:18 PM
 #4

VinceSamios just confirmed himself as a mod as well.

And proud of the success we had removing the extremely disruptive spam.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
Mabsark (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 08:41:24 PM
 #5

VinceSamios just confirmed himself as a mod as well.

And proud of the success we had removing the extremely disruptive spam.

Spam such as quoting Ken to point out that the Chips are not ActMs? Spam such as pointing out that Ken announced the chips after going to California where HashFast are based and concluding they're HashFast chips?

Why didn't you remove the spam from retarded mods who kept insisting that the chips where ActM's?

VinceSamios
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2014, 08:47:50 PM
 #6

People can speculate all they like as long as they're respectful and reasonable. - you might notice I called it early and said they weren't ActM chips, although I initially thought they might be avalon, and that I'm still saying they aren't actm chips.

The Happy Clappy Bitcoin Chappy - http://twitter.com/vincesamios
Mabsark (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1004


View Profile
March 28, 2014, 08:54:15 PM
 #7

People can speculate all they like as long as they're respectful and reasonable. - you might notice I called it early and said they weren't ActM chips, although I initially thought they might be avalon, and that I'm still saying they aren't actm chips.

The mods are actively deleting posts that are respectful and reasonable, so no they can't.
MPOE-PR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 522



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 09:42:48 PM
 #8

I think he should and I think everyone who has been abused by the mods in that shitty thread should leave some negative feedback.

Wait, that's why the guy was throwing all that derpage in neobee thread? Lol.

My Credentials  | THE BTC Stock Exchange | I have my very own anthology! | Use bitcointa.lk, it's like this one but better.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!