Play Chess for Crypto

[Z-tight]

However, I think it's essential to have clear terms and conditions and a secure way to handle the funds.

Op already made the terms clear, they are charging a 7.5% commission, and they consider themselve to be 'reputable' enough to handle the funds. Of course i disagree, there is no reason why anyone should trust op yet with this, we have also been waiting for op to prove the claims they made that they have already had a few customers, but they have not done that yet.

[aioc]

Look I offer a service which some might be interested in. We've had 7 Games already and 4 people participated.

Post links to games (which you claim to have conducted successfully) and payments.

I agree.  If you make a claim, you need to back it up, or we will not trust anything you say. 

I think he could not he log in two days ago
Last Active:   August 06, 2024, 03:32:13 PM
There are two of you asking for links to his claims, but he failed to provide them, and I don't think he has proof because he will post them right away when he makes the claims, so we cannot trust anything he says now. 

[ditec_wrogn]

However, I think it's essential to have clear terms and conditions and a secure way to handle the funds.

Op already made the terms clear, they are charging a 7.5% commission, and they consider themselve to be 'reputable' enough to handle the funds. Of course i disagree, there is no reason why anyone should trust op yet with this, we have also been waiting for op to prove the claims they made that they have already had a few customers, but they have not done that yet.

A 7.5% commission has been mentioned, but the specifics of fund handling are still unclear. For instance, they could clarify whether they will use a 2-of-3 multisig setup or a regular address for receiving payments. Using a regular address for receiving payments, for example, could potentially put users at risk, as a scammer could simply run off with the money.

[Z-tight]

For instance, they could clarify whether they will use a 2-of-3 multisig setup or a regular address for receiving payments. Using a regular address for receiving payments, for example, could potentially put users at risk, as a scammer could simply run off with the money.

Even if op uses a 2-of-3 multisig wallet that they control all keys, then it changes nothing, except op is going to control one key and his customers will control another key. However, i don't think a multisig wallet is in op's plans, if it was then they would have told us, op just wants us to believe that they are reputable enough to handle this.

[Pmalek]

You can't just claim you are reputable because you say so and because you promise you can be trusted with holding other people's money. You are not needed to hold the money in the first place, let alone keep 7.5% of it as commission. Compared to you who is brand-new and no one knows you, Bitcointalk has many trusted escrow agents who have been members of the forum for years. Their commission for escrow deals is around 1%. No offense, but if I needed an escrow, it's very clear to me who I should contact. 

[JollyGood]

I am making a different comment to the escrow ones recently posted.

What were to happen if one of the players were cheating by using a different device to enter all the moves in to (such as a grandmaster type software) and then use the computer moves to enter in to the duel? Effectively it would mean a grandmaster playing against a lesser opponent. That is of course unless both players are using the same tactics in trying to beat each other.

[Vod]

I am making a different comment to the escrow ones recently posted.

What were to happen if one of the players were cheating by using a different device to enter all the moves in to (such as a grandmaster type software) and then use the computer moves to enter in to the duel? Effectively it would mean a grandmaster playing against a lesser opponent. That is of course unless both players are using the same tactics in trying to beat each other.

If money is involved, you just assume each player is cheating - simply because they can.  The only way to "catch" them is to run the exact simulator they are running and get a large enough dataset to prove.   But then what?   lol