The banning or regularization of casinos by govs has not resulted in anything

[AbuBhakar]

China has begun to take control or become the head of international gambling with the aim of increasing state revenue. In addition, ethnic Chinese are a single segment of the Asian gambling market, their fondness for gambling is well known. The Chinese government does not want money circulating in other countries. even in early 2024, the Chinese government banned its citizens from gambling abroad. Even cross-border gambling is a violation of the law. This shows how serious China is about the potential profits of the gambling business.

I’m not aware with this development about gambling industry on China since their citizens preferred to gamble abroad rather than to their own country because of their regulations.

Many Chinese corporations even operate a lot of POGO in my country Philippines and manage to plant politicians using their own people as spy just to operate freely here without being notice by the government so I thought China is still strict on gambling in their own soil.

I guess they decided to capitalize now on gambling industry which generates huge income in other country that Chinese gambler use to play.

[TheUltraElite]

Some casinos have terms against the use of VPN, so please do read the sheet carefully before you start playing there or be ready for unforeseen circumstances.

Also this is nothing new for the governments and they have to do what the idiotic politicians who run the government want. Often times they make moves to appease one section of the country to gather their votes and sometimes they do so for getting more tax. It is either money or votes - these are the only two things that politicians understand.

They might reverse the ban in a year or so, happened with other countries too, cant recall precisely.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Some casinos have terms against the use of VPN, so please do read the sheet carefully before you start playing there or be ready for unforeseen circumstances.

Also this is nothing new for the governments and they have to do what the idiotic politicians who run the government want. Often times they make moves to appease one section of the country to gather their votes and sometimes they do so for getting more tax. It is either money or votes - these are the only two things that politicians understand.

They might reverse the ban in a year or so, happened with other countries too, cant recall precisely.

When casinos around the world Understand that they have to deal directly with governments in order to survive, they will be able to accept VPNs and all the necessary tools, as it was before, before casinos did not care if they played with VPN or whatever, what mattered was that they would attract more customers, now I am sure that everything will go in the sense and direction towards a more directed path of more freedom, that is, the time will come where people will no longer comply with KYC , where they will want to play only with VPN so as not to be tracked , and those casinos that allow it are the ones that will monopolize those customers.

[DPHOR]

Some casinos have terms against the use of VPN, so please do read the sheet carefully before you start playing there or be ready for unforeseen circumstances.

Also this is nothing new for the governments and they have to do what the idiotic politicians who run the government want. Often times they make moves to appease one section of the country to gather their votes and sometimes they do so for getting more tax. It is either money or votes - these are the only two things that politicians understand.

They might reverse the ban in a year or so, happened with other countries too, cant recall precisely.

When casinos around the world Understand that they have to deal directly with governments in order to survive, they will be able to accept VPNs and all the necessary tools, as it was before, before casinos did not care if they played with VPN or whatever, what mattered was that they would attract more customers, now I am sure that everything will go in the sense and direction towards a more directed path of more freedom, that is, the time will come where people will no longer comply with KYC , where they will want to play only with VPN so as not to be tracked , and those casinos that allow it are the ones that will monopolize those customers.

But currently it's not still possible for casinos to allow the use of vpn, even though some of the casinos are allowing it currently there would be a time where the casino would need information from the country of your use. For instance, when someone uses vpn maybe their country or region is restricted and they manages to pass kyc using other countries when the casino need additional information and they weren't able to provide same information then automatically such account Is restricted or halted.
But for casinos that allows vpn and they clearly stated it in their ToS wouldn't have any future case against its users.

[Oluwa-btc]

Recently, in the year 2024, the brazilian government saw a large source of money coming into online casinos (since physical casinos are prohibited by law), and since then, so as not to make this post too long... the brazilian government had the "brilliant" idea of requiring that any casino that wanted to operate in brazil would have to regularize itself and follow the country's rules, or its website would be blocked.

This could be a sign of Positivity and new development but then the internet is created for so many purposes inorder to serve the needs of man so therefore the government don't really have to dictate for it but then let's not forget the government always have their way around things and at such the use of VPN to access sites and casino that are ban could be favourable to the gamblers now but I don't think it's going to last long since the use of physical casino and some website is already ban by the Brazilian government,so it's better of to abide by the rules of the Brazil government.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If a government decides to charge gamblers to pay taxes then they should also be able to make some refunds to them when they gamble and lose let us now see between them and gamblers who will be at the losing end because if they calculate the amount gamblers losing on a daily basis and for them to pay gamblers according to the percentage of losses they have incurred. If a government charge taxes on those operating casinos it is reasonable instead of taxing those who are playing in a casino, if am even in such country we will just hold a meeting among gamblers that no one should gamble then let us see how they will get the tax they are asking them to pay.

Well that is the logical thing to do, what should really be done but it is not like that, it does not work like that, at least in my country they do it but under the table, that is to say, they do everything through third parties and with large amounts of money that they demand and that is something that is always fulfilled, the governments in the countries that are first world I do not know if they do it like that or not, maybe it is something that at least I do not know if they lie there, but here things are handled like that, there should always be a balance, an equilibrium of things, but I think that will happen in the countries that have more ethics, it could be Switzerland.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Governments are not going to stop or put an end to the way of threat they have always give on gambling, because they also uses the sector for some coverings for themselves in other to source for money, yet it is not against the law in most cases and they cant do without frustrating the regulations guiding it, because they know that in this, the only means they can engage in other to keep receiving from them is by usual and constant attack on them, this will make them feels its an act against the law to gamble while the government are being proud of receiving money paid by these gambling platforms all in the name of regulation.

[Wiwo]

Governments are not going to stop or put an end to the way of threat they have always give on gambling, because they also uses the sector for some coverings for themselves in other to source for money, yet it is not against the law in most cases and they cant do without frustrating the regulations guiding it, because they know that in this, the only means they can engage in other to keep receiving from them is by usual and constant attack on them, this will make them feels its an act against the law to gamble while the government are being proud of receiving money paid by these gambling platforms all in the name of regulation.

For countries that have gambling regulations, it is very hard for them to stop gambling promotions, this is because as long as casinos are regulated they will act on that right to manage whatever advertisements they want to use and for sure we have to relate to everything the way it comes.

In my country, cryptocurrency casinos are not regulated bit then still we have unrestricted access to most popular gambling sites around the world just a few restricted ones but even at that one can still bypass such restrictions.

[joniboini]

Some countries won't stop banning them because the majority of their citizens believe in one or two ideologies that ban their believers from doing that. Even if the government doesn't believe in any of that, they won't go against the society hence why they apply some loose policy like this. Pretty sure they realize the drawback of pushing that money overseas, but it's probably worth it if they can increase their soft power or maintain it after some big scandal hits them.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Governments are not going to stop or put an end to the way of threat they have always give on gambling, because they also uses the sector for some coverings for themselves in other to source for money, yet it is not against the law in most cases and they cant do without frustrating the regulations guiding it, because they know that in this, the only means they can engage in other to keep receiving from them is by usual and constant attack on them, this will make them feels its an act against the law to gamble while the government are being proud of receiving money paid by these gambling platforms all in the name of regulation.

You reminded me of a topic that the OP was asking to know the different casinos that were owned by some politicians. I do partially agree with you, some politically exposed personal could be deep involved with the casino and they would definitely wants to loosen the regulatory laws on casinos, so that they could also stand in favour of their business, they know they can not benefit when the law is so tight.