@LEVSKI7 Of course, it all depends on what the regulation is. In fact, I don't find it so controversial to cancel a bet where there is an obvious error in the odds. Of course, it should be clear what the error is in the odds. It is not a error if you offer 1.83 and other places offer 5-10% less/more. We are talking about obvious mistakes, where they odds are reversed in relation to the teams and the like.
For example, in Italy, sports-betting regulation is at a fairly high level, and the rule is that all bets placed must be paid. There have been cases where bettors placed good amounts for obvious mistakes, for example odds were mistakenly switched in live. Instead of 1.20 on home they offered that on away win, and people played 5.00 on home win. There were situations when people placed bets in a match where a goal had already been scored, but the scout did not made an input of goal at the match or there was some technical error. So, we are talking about situations where people placed on the wrong odds 20.00-30.00. And all bets stand. Rules are rules.
But these guys from Betby void a good majority of winning bets, and it's not about the odds being wrong. It's just because you won. That's the problem, they will cancel whatever they want. So, they have their own interpretation of what value-bets and the like are, and accordingly they have given themselves the right to cancel everything that suits them - even though the match is already over and the result is known. So, there is no point in posting Scam Accusations against the casino anymore, when it is mostly about a canceled bet by Betby. And quite a large number of casinos use their feed. I really have no words to describe this crime these people are doing, I doubt that the bookies in Runda, Zimambwe and Burundi are doing something like that, with all due respect.
I agree with all of this. A bad line should be cancelled. A value line shouldn't be cancelled since it's subjective. Only scam sites cancel value lines.
A wrong line or set of odds is if for example is when they have priced tennis player A 1.33 odds and tennis player B 3.25 odds when they correct is the other way around.In this case , of course there is an error in the odds setup since the odds are reversed.That is the definition of "wrong odds".
When the sportsbook has the over 2.5 for an inplay event priced at 1.97 and the line on Pinnacle is 1.65 , then this 1.97 is clearly a VALUE spot and it's completely scam to void such a won bet.
Also for basketball if the line in bet365 is -11.5 and BetBy has the line at -7.5 then this -7.5 handicap is just a value spot which can win or lose any time of the day.
The difference between these two is clear and 95% of the bettors can indicate what is value and what is wrong odds.
BetBy just ABUSES their definition of "wrong odds" in their terms and conditions , voiding whichever betslip they like (only won betslips of course) without providing anyone of a clear answer of "what they consider wrong odds".
