AI for sports prediction.

[TravelMug]

AI will just compare the recent stats of both teams and even very small details that we fanatics could miss out but it's still not enough to accurately predict what will happen in the future. AI can give most probable outcome if both team goes head to head but the choice is yours whether to take it or not but it's just mostly on the line with the odds so you don't need AI at all to predict such games.

And recently, I asked AI as who is going to win in the Wimbledon, between Djokovic vs Sinner. Deepseek and ChatGPT gives me a conflicting results. So I guess for now it can really predict who's going to win in sports matches. Or maybe it's just too early as the data might not be enough for them. Or it is just sports betting, there are some elements that us humans can only know that AI can't feel and see. There are data or the intangibles like a player is injured or maybe sick and so during the game they are obviously not healthy and 100%. Perhaps you guys can test it yourself, the finals will be Sinner vs Alcaraz, ask both Deepseek and ChatGPT and see if you can replicate what I got from them as a answer. For perspective, it was ChatGPT that says Sinner is going to win, but Deepseek points out that Djokovic because of his experience is going to beat the young Jannik Sinner.

[CryptoYar]

You are right about AI and sports predictions while AI is great at looking at numbers and past trends it struggles to correctly predict sports especially football because games are so unpredictable. AI can show you stats and team forms but it mostly misses key human factors and last minute changes that really affect match like main player getting injured team mood changing or bad referee call which AI can not truly understand.

This is why if you know sport well you will likely win more bets than you lose as knowledgeable person can consider things like player usual impact or team spirit which AI can not easily put into its calculations proving that human understanding still has edge in predicting sports outcomes.

[KiaKia]

You are right about AI and sports predictions while AI is great at looking at numbers and past trends it struggles to correctly predict sports especially football because games are so unpredictable. AI can show you stats and team forms but it mostly misses key human factors and last minute changes that really affect match like main player getting injured team mood changing or bad referee call which AI can not truly understand.

This is why if you know sport well you will likely win more bets than you lose as knowledgeable person can consider things like player usual impact or team spirit which AI can not easily put into its calculations proving that human understanding still has edge in predicting sports outcomes.

You are right but still, those who know sports very well still lose money to gambling, there are many of them that went broke due to this same fact that they know about sport very well, the chances of winning isn't that high as we think because those who know about sport are more into sport bets than those who knows too less about sport.

Gambling is so much risky than just thinking that you can do so well because you know sport very well, it doesn't safe you from losing money to gamble because you can't still control your luck.

In fact it doesn't help a lot of people, know everything that's needed to be known about sport, you will still lag behind if you will get lucky or not, if its very easy many sport fans would have good stories to share, but its the other way around.

[Bitcoin Smith]

AI will just compare the recent stats of both teams and even very small details that we fanatics could miss out but it's still not enough to accurately predict what will happen in the future. AI can give most probable outcome if both team goes head to head but the choice is yours whether to take it or not but it's just mostly on the line with the odds so you don't need AI at all to predict such games.

And recently, I asked AI as who is going to win in the Wimbledon, between Djokovic vs Sinner. Deepseek and ChatGPT gives me a conflicting results. So I guess for now it can really predict who's going to win in sports matches. Or maybe it's just too early as the data might not be enough for them. Or it is just sports betting, there are some elements that us humans can only know that AI can't feel and see. There are data or the intangibles like a player is injured or maybe sick and so during the game they are obviously not healthy and 100%. Perhaps you guys can test it yourself, the finals will be Sinner vs Alcaraz, ask both Deepseek and ChatGPT and see if you can replicate what I got from them as a answer. For perspective, it was ChatGPT that says Sinner is going to win, but Deepseek points out that Djokovic because of his experience is going to beat the young Jannik Sinner.

As I said, AI can can compare even small details that we might miss out just as age factors and how they did in the recent past while we can get carried away with the emotions or just being a fan of one particular player but history is just not enough to predict the future that is the point so AI can give possibility like High/low/medium when we ask such questions but those can't be really considered making our decision to bet on them, betting is our decision so we must take responsibility for our actions.

[Alex077]

   I really think AI can be super useful for predicting results — if you know how to use it right.
When it comes to sports betting, AI can break down tons of data — like player stats, team history, past results — and find patterns that aren’t obvious, that means more accurate predictions.
It can even give real-time updates and adjust odds as things change.
And on top of that, AI helps track how athletes are doing over time, which makes it easier to make smart, well-informed bets.
 But no doubt, AI predictions are just a tool or a helpful hint, the final decision still has to come from us.