Poker RTA - Real-time Assistance for Poker

[o48o]

This is so much a scam i don't know where to start from.
Profit growth chart is quite hilarious, and i am assuming that you thought that prices like these could make you look legit.

It's not "risk free" when i install something to my computer that has direct connect to my account that has money in it.

-cut-
We actually turn away new players with little or no experience because they're simply not going to be huge winners right away. You should think of our tool as something that helps you improve, not something that makes you a magician at the poker table. It's about getting better, not instant success.

This was so dumb, i honestly laughed and spilled my coffee. You are claiming to give free access, yet you turn away "new" players. How are you defining new players? The ones that lose?
That actually makes sense as you can always blame the players for not understanding your god-tier vision and just stop serving them this scam. Obviously you'll just keep the money .

Questions, just out of curiosity:

What are your supposed costs that justify the price?



Why are your only blog posts from 2025 if you have been a product since 2019?
I am being sarcastic, as every answer i would get make no sense.

[RTA.POKER]

This is so much a scam i don't know where to start from.
Profit growth chart is quite hilarious, and i am assuming that you thought that prices like these could make you look legit.

It's not "risk free" when i install something to my computer that has direct connect to my account that has money in it.

-cut-
We actually turn away new players with little or no experience because they're simply not going to be huge winners right away. You should think of our tool as something that helps you improve, not something that makes you a magician at the poker table. It's about getting better, not instant success.

This was so dumb, i honestly laughed and spilled my coffee. You are claiming to give free access, yet you turn away "new" players. How are you defining new players? The ones that lose?
That actually makes sense as you can always blame the players for not understanding your god-tier vision and just stop serving them this scam. Obviously you'll just keep the money .

Questions, just out of curiosity:

What are your supposed costs that justify the price?



Why are your only blog posts from 2025 if you have been a product since 2019?
I am being sarcastic, as every answer i would get make no sense.

You keep using words like “scam” and “risk-free” without really understanding what they mean. We’ve always been clear about what our tool does and what users can expect-there’s no deception involved. If someone paid and didn’t get what was promised, that would be a real issue, but that’s never happened.

When we say “try our RTA – risk-free,” we simply mean that anyone can test the program with play money if they want, which involves no actual risk. That also means we don’t take a single penny until you’ve seen and tried the program for yourself-only after the client is happy with the program do they make the payment.

In which world do you think it’s possible for us to trick someone under those conditions?


Regarding your disbelief about us refusing low-stakes players- your comment about “spitting your coffee.” If you actually visited our website, you’d see that we require everyone to answer five questions before moving forward. After that, I always ask more questions directly. We don’t have the time to do complex setups with clients who aren’t serious or who we believe won’t be long-term users. These setups aren’t easy-they often take 5–10 hours to complete for each player. About the price we’re actually on the cheaper side compared to our competition, who offer something similar. This directly disproves your claim that we’re trying to “look serious” by charging an inflated price. Our pricing reflects not just the setup time, but also the 20,000+ hours invested in coding and development, as well as server and storage costs that exceeded six figures long ago. On top of that, we offer a unique, specialized service that sets us apart.
As for your question about why our blog posts are from 2025: we’ve addressed this on our site as well. The reason is simple-until this year, we only promoted our software privately on the Poker-AI forum and didn’t have a public-facing blog or broader marketing. That’s why you won’t find older blog content; we only started sharing updates and information publicly in 2025.

I have to say, it’s remarkable how confidently some people spread misinformation and genuinely believe they have all the facts. It’s ironic to call something “dumb” while making such uninformed assumptions

[Free Market Capitalist]

You keep using words like “scam” and “risk-free” without really understanding what they mean. We’ve always been clear about what our tool does and what users can expect-there’s no deception involved. If someone paid and didn’t get what was promised, that would be a real issue, but that’s never happened.

When we say “try our RTA – risk-free,” we simply mean that anyone can test the program with play money if they want, which involves no actual risk. That also means we don’t take a single penny until you’ve seen and tried the program for yourself-only after the client is happy with the program do they make the payment.

In which world do you think it’s possible for us to trick someone under those conditions?

In the real world.

Who are you trying to fool? Probably people who don't have much idea about poker are the only ones you will be able to convince with these arguments. Anyone who knows poker knows that the play money game is completely different from the real money game.

What are your supposed costs that justify the price?

You don't know much about business, do you? Costs in many sectors are not related to the price of the product. They serve to establish a minimum, but if the product is highly demanded and you have established a brand the price can be 100 times more than the production price, that's why Gucci charges $1K for t-shirts that cost $10 to produce.

[RTA.POKER]

You keep using words like “scam” and “risk-free” without really understanding what they mean. We’ve always been clear about what our tool does and what users can expect-there’s no deception involved. If someone paid and didn’t get what was promised, that would be a real issue, but that’s never happened.

When we say “try our RTA – risk-free,” we simply mean that anyone can test the program with play money if they want, which involves no actual risk. That also means we don’t take a single penny until you’ve seen and tried the program for yourself-only after the client is happy with the program do they make the payment.

In which world do you think it’s possible for us to trick someone under those conditions?

In the real world.

Who are you trying to fool? Probably people who don't have much idea about poker are the only ones you will be able to convince with these arguments. Anyone who knows poker knows that the play money game is completely different from the real money game.

What are your supposed costs that justify the price?

You don't know much about business, do you? Costs in many sectors are not related to the price of the product. They serve to establish a minimum, but if the product is highly demanded and you have established a brand the price can be 100 times more than the production price, that's why Gucci charges $1K for t-shirts that cost $10 to produce.

The only reason I mentioned the play money option was because the previous poster claimed nobody could test the software without risking anything-I just pointed out that’s not true. For serious players, testing with play money isn’t really the point and anyone can choose whether they want to test it with play money or real money-we don’t limit that in any way. What actually matters is verifying that we provide accurate GTO solutions and that our OCR works flawlessly. That’s what experienced users care about before making any payment and that’s exactly what we demonstrate.

You actually make a good point yourself: "in many sectors" price isn’t strictly tied to production costs. But saying costs don’t matter at all is incorrect-costs always set the minimum (the floor) for any business.

Anyway, my original argument wasn’t about our costs-it was that our pricing is in line with or even below our competition, not inflated just to “look serious”

[memehunter]

I am amazed to see the audacity, OP is pretending to be an honest cheater (since he is facilitating cheating). It is crystal clear that RTA is banned on every poker platform where humans play. Even if you leave morality aside it is also clear that if any poker platform finds you cheating they will confiscate your winnings and ban you for life. Keep in mind that majority poker platform needs KYC so you will be stored in their data base as cheater for life and I am sure there will be centralized database sooner or later among different casinos, just imagine you will not be able to play anywhere with a tag of cheater on your head.
Now how does he solve the problem? Have a close look;
 

The setup we help you build isn't detectable at all. The only way any of our clients could get caught is if someone analyzed their playing strategies and noticed they're too close to GTO.

Yeah, I wonder how difficult it would be for any poker platform that has the data of every single hand played by you

[RTA.POKER]

I am amazed to see the audacity, OP is pretending to be an honest cheater (since he is facilitating cheating). It is crystal clear that RTA is banned on every poker platform where humans play. Even if you leave morality aside it is also clear that if any poker platform finds you cheating they will confiscate your winnings and ban you for life. Keep in mind that majority poker platform needs KYC so you will be stored in their data base as cheater for life and I am sure there will be centralized database sooner or later among different casinos, just imagine you will not be able to play anywhere with a tag of cheater on your head.
Now how does he solve the problem? Have a close look;
 

The setup we help you build isn't detectable at all. The only way any of our clients could get caught is if someone analyzed their playing strategies and noticed they're too close to GTO.

Yeah, I wonder how difficult it would be for any poker platform that has the data of every single hand played by you

1. I’ve never pretended to be an “honest cheater” - that’s your label, not mine.

2. Have you ever heard of data protection laws? Online poker sites, especially in Europe, are bound by strict regulations like the GDPR, which specifically prohibit sharing personal information about players with other companies or platforms without a legal basis. The idea that your “cheater” label would follow you across sites via a shared database is just not how data privacy works in regulated markets.

3. As I’ve explained before, sites can only confiscate funds if they have clear, concrete evidence of cheating. In most cases, if they can’t provide that evidence, they’re required to return the money. Simply saying someone played “too close to GTO” is not evidence that would hold up anywhere-certainly not in court or with payment processors. There are multiple examples where funds were returned to players when sites couldn’t prove wrongdoing. Operators can ban accounts, but permanent bans and fund confiscation without proof don’t hold up legally.

So, these issues aren’t as “crystal clear” as you make them out to be. If you’re going to make claims about data sharing and confiscations, at least get the facts straight.

[Free Market Capitalist]

You can shove your offer up your ass. Besides the fact that what you're offering is prohibited, at least in the best poker rooms, things like this are exactly why online poker is heading toward a future of bots playing against bots (or players using RTA against other players using RTA) while the rooms just rake in the profits. I don’t think you’ll have much success here. Aside from the skepticism in the responses, nobody is going to pay that kind of money, assuming what you’re offering even works.

Arent you promoting casino games? That's peak hypocrisy - condemning our poker tech while pushing games with built-in house edges.

No, it's not. It would be hypocrisy if I promoted a software forbidden in pretty much all casinos, which I am not doing.

I don't think you are a scammer and you would only be so in the event that the product you sell does not work but most likely it does work, which I will not check because I don't play anymore. But in any case every potential buyer of your software should be aware that what he buys is forbidden and that he may end up with his account banned and his funds confiscated.

[Dicbac]

You can shove your offer up your ass. Besides the fact that what you're offering is prohibited, at least in the best poker rooms, things like this are exactly why online poker is heading toward a future of bots playing against bots (or players using RTA against other players using RTA) while the rooms just rake in the profits. I don’t think you’ll have much success here. Aside from the skepticism in the responses, nobody is going to pay that kind of money, assuming what you’re offering even works.

Arent you promoting casino games? That's peak hypocrisy - condemning our poker tech while pushing games with built-in house edges.

Our product isn't killing poker - it's just part of the evolution. Players have always sought edges through books, coaching and software. Besides that AI is catching up everywhere.

Ethics in poker are subjective and everyone is free to form their own opinion about what's ethical and what's not. Just because poker sites prohibit these tools doesn't automatically make them unethical. After all, there aren't actual laws forbidding the use of such tools - as Natural8 (a GGPoker skin) states: "Real-time assistance may not be considered illegal in a court of law." The distinction between site rules and actual legality is important to recognize.

As for your price concerns - our long-term clients clearly see the value, or they wouldn't stay with us. But thanks for your colorful feedback.

The house edge of a casino and the advertising of a casino does not have to be hypocritical at all, since all people (or all least people with a minimum of experience on gambling) are aware there is a edge the house uses to guarantee long term profits for their bookies and casinos. Gambling is a business and any business is supposed to be profitable through time, otherwise it would not be a business but rather a charity or a non-profit organization.
On the other hand, the tool you are trying to sell us here are against the terms of conditions of most casinos which offer poker as one of their casino games and there is a good reason for it, it kill the experience and the chances for those who just want to have a clear experience and use their human acquired experience to try to have fun and earn a buck from their session.
The fact you come here offering this service to us instead of using it yourself for your own economical benefit, it is an indicative you have probably been caught several times and banned from several casinos and now you need to capitalize off your tool by selling it to us.  

For the particular argument you are raising against OP, you are on the losing end, most definitely. I agree with ur first point, partially, in that it doesnt need to be hypocritical. But yet the way society is positioned currently, it is quite. Sub-point one that "All, or at least people with minimum gambling experience" means not all - irrelevant sentence for your own argument and actually works against what you are trying to say. Point 3 is very mastermind insight, casinos are businesses. Businesses can be ran ethically and unethically. Are most casinos the former or latter? I do not know for definite. Are most crypto casinos the former or latter? Without a doubt the latter. I have accounts at somewhere in the region of 40-60 crypto casinos. How many of them could i actually recommend to someone i genuinely had the best intentions for? 2-4. The rest are sketchy, to say the least. Abhorrent scams, to put it bluntly. With casinos able to choose what rtp the games run at, within preset parameters, and with many games not displaying rtp a lot of the time, and almost never displaying volatility, and never displaying hit-rate, you can never say that even an experiences gambler can be fully aware to the underlying principles of a random game they are playing.

There is a big difference in a couple of %, that cannot be argued. Had that exact experience myself yesterday on winz.io who set all their slot games to have a house edge of 4-5+%, cant remember which. Hadn't played on the site for a long time and definitely have now had my final session on it, because there is never any fun in dead-spinning hundreds of spins in a row on a game you are familiar with that you know does not act like that.

Moving on, you raised a point about the sacred terms and conditions you value so highly, but fail to acknowledge the astonishing amount of crash predictor applications, arbitrage betting resource sites and other types of likely banned forms of betting (i do not bet so i do not know), discord servers selling software to predict something or another, and so on. Now, whether any of these things work is up for debate, likely not, only arb betting.

Same as this software being advertised, you simply do not know one way or another unless you try it, and OP makes a good point that applies to many aspects of life and are the core drive of many nefarious activities (ever hear of the war on drugs? drugs won), of someone cant get something they want from somewhere, they simply do not stop wanting it, they just go elsewhere to somewhere that does have it.

I play poker so i am not defending the software and would rather not face against bots myself, however, you need to look at the bigger picture and not surrender yourself to bias because you valued the first idea you had most, with no room for compromise. 

[Free Market Capitalist]

With casinos able to choose what rtp the games run at, within preset parameters, and with many games not displaying rtp a lot of the time, and almost never displaying volatility, and never displaying hit-rate, you can never say that even an experiences gambler can be fully aware to the underlying principles of a random game they are playing.

So what? That doesn't happen with the casino I am advertising, where RTP and volatility are clearly displayed and that has had minimal accusations of scam, especially for the huge customer base it has.

Moving on, you raised a point about the sacred terms and conditions you value so highly, but fail to acknowledge the astonishing amount of crash predictor applications, arbitrage betting resource sites and other types of likely banned forms of betting (i do not bet so i do not know), discord servers selling software to predict something or another, and so on. Now, whether any of these things work is up for debate, likely not, only arb betting.

What?

Same as this software being advertised, you simply do not know one way or another unless you try it, and OP makes a good point that applies to many aspects of life and are the core drive of many nefarious activities (ever hear of the war on drugs? drugs won), of someone cant get something they want from somewhere, they simply do not stop wanting it, they just go elsewhere to somewhere that does have it.

I play poker so i am not defending the software and would rather not face against bots myself, however, you need to look at the bigger picture and not surrender yourself to bias because you valued the first idea you had most, with no room for compromise. 

I don't know what lessons you are trying to give me but they don't fit. The game of poker has become increasingly robotic, and having some tools allowed that allow leverage I do not know why you defend this forbidden tool that what it does is that you do not play poker, you just execute the decisions that the system tells you. It is playing like a bot but you push the button.

[memehunter]

1. I’ve never pretended to be an “honest cheater” - that’s your label, not mine.

Liar, let me break it down to your dumb brain;
You are selling cheating software = you are a cheater (an actual cheater for normal poker players and a potential cheater of your clients)

Have you ever heard of data protection laws?

hahaha look at the screenshot below from your own website itself, Mr liar, there you seem to agree with me 

Simply saying someone played “too close to GTO” is not evidence that would hold up anywhere-certainly not in court or with payment processors.

Simply saying it would not, but data from previous hands denoting a high level of resemblance to GTO would. The same thing is done in chess where if they find high accuracy over many moves you will be banned with a tag of cheater on you head for life. Why would a poker platform go to court if they can simply confiscate your money and ban your account? My brain cells are dying understanding your position, I mean by even signing up at any poker platform you are bound by their contract which prohibits RTA  . You can't do anything about it and you know it, that's why you are targetting other innocent players to scam them by giving them false hope. Are you saying they cannot prove it in court but you can .
Here are a couple more SSs from your website;



It seems you are not that sure there about the legality of RTA like you are here, Mr cheater.




You seem to agree with me quite a lot, Mr, unethical.

[RTA.POKER]

1. I’ve never pretended to be an “honest cheater” - that’s your label, not mine.

Liar, let me break it down to your dumb brain;
You are selling cheating software = you are a cheater (an actual cheater for normal poker players and a potential cheater of your clients)

Have you ever heard of data protection laws?

hahaha look at the screenshot below from your own website itself, Mr liar, there you seem to agree with me  

Simply saying someone played “too close to GTO” is not evidence that would hold up anywhere-certainly not in court or with payment processors.

Simply saying it would not, but data from previous hands denoting a high level of resemblance to GTO would. The same thing is done in chess where if they find high accuracy over many moves you will be banned with a tag of cheater on you head for life. Why would a poker platform go to court if they can simply confiscate your money and ban your account? My brain cells are dying understanding your position, I mean by even signing up at any poker platform you are bound by their contract which prohibits RTA  . You can't do anything about it and you know it, that's why you are targetting other innocent players to scam them by giving them false hope. Are you saying they cannot prove it in court but you can .
Here are a couple more SSs from your website;



It seems you are not that sure there about the legality of RTA like you are here, Mr cheater.




You seem to agree with me quite a lot, Mr, unethical.

You're selectively cherry-picking parts of our website to try to prove your point while ignoring context. We've been completely transparent from the beginning:

1. Fair enough, the 1st point about "collaboration between sites" could seem contradictory, but it simply reflects what poker sites claim in their policies, not what they can legally implement. The reality is that data protection laws like GDPR significantly restrict how personal information can be shared between companies. While poker sites may share certain data for specific legal purposes like fraud prevention, they cannot freely exchange player information without proper legal basis.

2. Yes, our website clearly states that poker sites prohibit RTA tools in their terms of service. We've never denied or hidden this fact.

3. We also note the important distinction between site terms (private contractual agreements) and actual laws. That's why our disclaimer says "may not be strictly illegal in many places" while acknowledging the consequences from operators.

We've always maintained that the ethical considerations around RTA tools aren't black and white - people can hold different views on this matter. This has consistently been our position.


This technological era brings constant ethical challenges. Today's debate about poker assistance tools mirrors tomorrow's dilemmas about AI glasses in classrooms or workplaces. As technology evolves, the boundary between "unfair advantage" and "innovative tool" continuously shifts. Universities already face this with ChatGPT (GPT‑4o) or any other LLM - ban it, embrace it, or redesign around it? Those with advanced technological assistance will inevitably outperform those without.

In poker, the ethical stance against RTA is "straightforward" because poker operators have no business incentive to tolerate such tools - unlike other technological innovations that platforms might embrace for competitive advantage, RTA directly undermines the game's integrity and economics without offering casinos any offsetting benefits.

While sites publicly maintain zero-tolerance policies with detection systems, the reality is more nuanced. Despite public stances against RTA, detection capabilities remain limited. If operators were truly committed to eliminating all assistance tools, they would implement more robust measures beyond current pattern-recognition systems.

This enforcement gap allows some RTA providers to operate with minimal concealment. While major sites have banned users, these represent only a fraction of the market. The technical challenge of proving "mathematical accuracy" in play creates substantial enforcement difficulties, allowing many tools to remain viable despite being openly marketed.

[o48o]

-cut-
In which world do you think it’s possible for us to trick someone under those conditions?
-cut-

Nice derailing. Let me rephrase so you'll understand me: How exactly are we supposed to trust that any software we get from you isn't full of malware?

Regarding your disbelief about us refusing low-stakes players- your comment about “spitting your coffee.” If you actually visited our website, you’d see that we require everyone to answer five questions before moving forward. After that, I always ask more questions directly. We don’t have the time to do complex setups with clients who aren’t serious or who we believe won’t be long-term users. These setups aren’t easy-they often take 5–10 hours to complete for each player. About the price we’re actually on the cheaper side compared to our competition, who offer something similar. This directly disproves your claim that we’re trying to “look serious” by charging an inflated price. Our pricing reflects not just the setup time, but also the 20,000+ hours invested in coding and development, as well as server and storage costs that exceeded six figures long ago. On top of that, we offer a unique, specialized service that sets us apart.
As for your question about why our blog posts are from 2025: we’ve addressed this on our site as well. The reason is simple-until this year, we only promoted our software privately on the Poker-AI forum and didn’t have a public-facing blog or broader marketing. That’s why you won’t find older blog content; we only started sharing updates and information publicly in 2025.

I have to say, it’s remarkable how confidently some people spread misinformation and genuinely believe they have all the facts. It’s ironic to call something “dumb” while making such uninformed assumptions

You are not freaking Adobe so there's no justifying for that amount and everything you say is unprovable anyway. Only way it makes sense is that you are trying to get people get the free version, because they think they would think it's an expensive exclusive club.

-cut-
We've been completely transparent from the beginning:
-cut-

Right, would you be so kind and provide us your business registration details / contact details so anyone stupid enough buying your service can move forward with their legal dispute later on?

Or should we just trust a company and a product without name or an owner? I guess that makes sense if you are targeting most gullible people.

[RTA.POKER]

-cut-
In which world do you think it’s possible for us to trick someone under those conditions?
-cut-

Nice derailing. Let me rephrase so you'll understand me: How exactly are we supposed to trust that any software we get from you isn't full of malware?

Regarding your disbelief about us refusing low-stakes players- your comment about “spitting your coffee.” If you actually visited our website, you’d see that we require everyone to answer five questions before moving forward. After that, I always ask more questions directly. We don’t have the time to do complex setups with clients who aren’t serious or who we believe won’t be long-term users. These setups aren’t easy-they often take 5–10 hours to complete for each player. About the price we’re actually on the cheaper side compared to our competition, who offer something similar. This directly disproves your claim that we’re trying to “look serious” by charging an inflated price. Our pricing reflects not just the setup time, but also the 20,000+ hours invested in coding and development, as well as server and storage costs that exceeded six figures long ago. On top of that, we offer a unique, specialized service that sets us apart.
As for your question about why our blog posts are from 2025: we’ve addressed this on our site as well. The reason is simple-until this year, we only promoted our software privately on the Poker-AI forum and didn’t have a public-facing blog or broader marketing. That’s why you won’t find older blog content; we only started sharing updates and information publicly in 2025.

I have to say, it’s remarkable how confidently some people spread misinformation and genuinely believe they have all the facts. It’s ironic to call something “dumb” while making such uninformed assumptions

You are not freaking Adobe so there's no justifying for that amount and everything you say is unprovable anyway. Only way it makes sense is that you are trying to get people get the free version, because they think they would think it's an expensive exclusive club.

-cut-
We've been completely transparent from the beginning:
-cut-

Right, would you be so kind and provide us your business registration details / contact details so anyone stupid enough buying your service can move forward with their legal dispute later on?

Or should we just trust a company and a product without name or an owner? I guess that makes sense if you are targeting most gullible people.

I do accept your worries about software protection, these are very reasonable worries for any user.
However, you are the one derailing jumping back and forth between very different question not me. You can review your own post history to observe this trend.
Interestingly, if we were fraudulent as you suggest, you'd be wanting us to go public and promote openly, that way anyone who's ever had issues with us could quite easily step forward and alert others. Instead, you seem to be discouraging our public presence. That's a strange position.

Regarding malware protection, we've taken several measures to address this:
As with any professional software firm that is not open source (in our situation, for very apparent reasons. We are not a huge corporation who would gain by being open source and quite frankly, our firm would immediately become obsolete if we were), users must employ normal security measures:
- Perform full antivirus and anti-malware scans of our software, as you would with any program
- Our software undergoes regular third-party security audits
- The application is executed in a sandboxed environment with very limited system access

We've been in business since 2019 with no reported security incidents from our users

As far as business registration and transparency are concerned, this entails numerous considerations under different jurisdictions and regulatory regimes. Our business structure deals with compliance obligations while taking into account privacy and industry-related considerations. Any relevant business documentation is disclosed in the course of the client onboarding process, subject to standard practice and relevant legal obligations. Other than that it's pretty weak to criticize us about privacy, well knowingly what kind of business we offer and where part of the foundational principles of Bitcoin itself is privacy and financial autonomy. The irony appears to be lost on you.
Our rates are market value, nothing more than that needs to be said. Here again the irony is catching you. You can see yourself what kind of troubles we have gaining trust from people and yet you compare us with a company that has millions of users. You also don't seem to understand the fundamental difference between an established corporation with massive user bases and a specialized software company operating in a grey niche market. We recognize that trust needs to be earned, particularly in this arena. Therefore, we provide trialperiods and operate with transparency suitable to our operating environment.